Cargando…

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study

PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely moni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansen-Winkeln, B., Eberth, J., Moulla, Y., Mehdorn, M., Niebisch, S., Schierle, K., Bläker, H., Lordick, F., Gockel, I., Thieme, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w
_version_ 1784900728027873280
author Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Eberth, J.
Moulla, Y.
Mehdorn, M.
Niebisch, S.
Schierle, K.
Bläker, H.
Lordick, F.
Gockel, I.
Thieme, R.
author_facet Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Eberth, J.
Moulla, Y.
Mehdorn, M.
Niebisch, S.
Schierle, K.
Bläker, H.
Lordick, F.
Gockel, I.
Thieme, R.
author_sort Jansen-Winkeln, B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS: We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m(2) body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m(2)) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ(2), p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108–586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC’s therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03100708 (April 2017). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9984350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99843502023-03-05 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study Jansen-Winkeln, B. Eberth, J. Moulla, Y. Mehdorn, M. Niebisch, S. Schierle, K. Bläker, H. Lordick, F. Gockel, I. Thieme, R. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS: We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m(2) body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m(2)) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ(2), p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108–586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC’s therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03100708 (April 2017). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9984350/ /pubmed/36513815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Eberth, J.
Moulla, Y.
Mehdorn, M.
Niebisch, S.
Schierle, K.
Bläker, H.
Lordick, F.
Gockel, I.
Thieme, R.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title_full Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title_fullStr Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title_full_unstemmed Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title_short Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
title_sort pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (pipac) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (psm): a prospective single-center registry study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jansenwinkelnb pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT eberthj pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT moullay pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT mehdornm pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT niebischs pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT schierlek pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT blakerh pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT lordickf pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT gockeli pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy
AT thiemer pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy