Cargando…
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study
PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely moni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w |
_version_ | 1784900728027873280 |
---|---|
author | Jansen-Winkeln, B. Eberth, J. Moulla, Y. Mehdorn, M. Niebisch, S. Schierle, K. Bläker, H. Lordick, F. Gockel, I. Thieme, R. |
author_facet | Jansen-Winkeln, B. Eberth, J. Moulla, Y. Mehdorn, M. Niebisch, S. Schierle, K. Bläker, H. Lordick, F. Gockel, I. Thieme, R. |
author_sort | Jansen-Winkeln, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS: We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m(2) body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m(2)) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ(2), p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108–586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC’s therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03100708 (April 2017). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9984350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99843502023-03-05 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study Jansen-Winkeln, B. Eberth, J. Moulla, Y. Mehdorn, M. Niebisch, S. Schierle, K. Bläker, H. Lordick, F. Gockel, I. Thieme, R. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new, palliative approach for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). Its main goals are to control symptoms and ascites. For this experimental procedure, treatment efficacy and patient safety need to be closely monitored. METHODS: We performed a prospective registry study for patients with PSMs. Cisplatin (C) (7.5 mg/m(2) body surface) and doxorubicin (D) (1.5 mg/m(2)) were administered laparoscopically via PIPAC. RESULTS: Between November 2015 and June 2020, we recorded data from 108 patients and 230 scheduled procedures. Tumor burden, patient fitness, quality of life, operating time and in-hospital stay remained stable over consecutive procedures. We recorded 21 non-access situations and 14 intraoperative complications (11 intestinal injuries, and three aspirations while inducing anesthesia). Three or more previous abdominal surgeries or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (HIPEC) were risk factors for non-access and intestinal injuries (χ(2), p ≤ 0.01). Five Grade IV and three Grade V postoperative complications according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC) occurred. Median overall survival was 264 days (interquartile range 108–586). Therapies were primarily discontinued because of death (34%), progressive (26%), or regressive (16%) disease. CONCLUSION: PIPAC is effective in stabilizing PSMs and retaining quality of life in selected patients. Earlier abdominal surgeries and CRS with HIPEC should be considered when determining the indication for PIPAC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate PIPAC’s therapeutic benefits compared to systemic chemotherapy (sCHT) alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03100708 (April 2017). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9984350/ /pubmed/36513815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Jansen-Winkeln, B. Eberth, J. Moulla, Y. Mehdorn, M. Niebisch, S. Schierle, K. Bläker, H. Lordick, F. Gockel, I. Thieme, R. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title | Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title_full | Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title_fullStr | Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title_short | Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM): a prospective single-center registry study |
title_sort | pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (pipac) in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (psm): a prospective single-center registry study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36513815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04517-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jansenwinkelnb pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT eberthj pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT moullay pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT mehdornm pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT niebischs pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT schierlek pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT blakerh pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT lordickf pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT gockeli pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy AT thiemer pressurizedintraperitonealaerosolchemotherapypipacinpatientswithperitonealsurfacemalignanciespsmaprospectivesinglecenterregistrystudy |