Cargando…

Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation is a known postoperative complication following retinal detachment (RD) repair surgery. Prophylactic peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) during surgery has been shown to reduce the risk of developing postoperative ERM formation. Some baseline character...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamas-Francis, David, Bande-Rodríguez, Manuel, Blanco-Teijeiro, María José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30060-w
_version_ 1784900756534460416
author Lamas-Francis, David
Bande-Rodríguez, Manuel
Blanco-Teijeiro, María José
author_facet Lamas-Francis, David
Bande-Rodríguez, Manuel
Blanco-Teijeiro, María José
author_sort Lamas-Francis, David
collection PubMed
description Epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation is a known postoperative complication following retinal detachment (RD) repair surgery. Prophylactic peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) during surgery has been shown to reduce the risk of developing postoperative ERM formation. Some baseline characteristics and degrees of surgical complexity may act as risk factors for ERM development. In this review we aimed to investigate the benefit of ILM peeling in patients without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for RD repair. A literature search using PubMed and various keywords retrieved relevant papers from which data were extracted and analyzed. Finally, the results of 12 observational studies (3420 eyes) were summarized. ILM peeling significantly reduced the risk of postoperative ERM formation (RR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05–0.28). The groups did not differ in final visual acuity (SMD 0.14 logMAR (95% CI − 0.03–0.31)). The risk of RD recurrence (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.94) and the need for secondary ERM surgery (RR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02–0.17) were also higher in the non-ILM peeling groups. In summary, although prophylactic ILM peeling appears to reduce the rate of postoperative ERM, this benefit does not translate into consistent visual recovery across studies and potential complications must be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9984489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99844892023-03-05 Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lamas-Francis, David Bande-Rodríguez, Manuel Blanco-Teijeiro, María José Sci Rep Article Epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation is a known postoperative complication following retinal detachment (RD) repair surgery. Prophylactic peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) during surgery has been shown to reduce the risk of developing postoperative ERM formation. Some baseline characteristics and degrees of surgical complexity may act as risk factors for ERM development. In this review we aimed to investigate the benefit of ILM peeling in patients without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for RD repair. A literature search using PubMed and various keywords retrieved relevant papers from which data were extracted and analyzed. Finally, the results of 12 observational studies (3420 eyes) were summarized. ILM peeling significantly reduced the risk of postoperative ERM formation (RR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05–0.28). The groups did not differ in final visual acuity (SMD 0.14 logMAR (95% CI − 0.03–0.31)). The risk of RD recurrence (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28–0.94) and the need for secondary ERM surgery (RR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02–0.17) were also higher in the non-ILM peeling groups. In summary, although prophylactic ILM peeling appears to reduce the rate of postoperative ERM, this benefit does not translate into consistent visual recovery across studies and potential complications must be considered. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9984489/ /pubmed/36869054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30060-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lamas-Francis, David
Bande-Rodríguez, Manuel
Blanco-Teijeiro, María José
Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Primary ILM peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort primary ilm peeling during retinal detachment repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36869054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30060-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lamasfrancisdavid primaryilmpeelingduringretinaldetachmentrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT banderodriguezmanuel primaryilmpeelingduringretinaldetachmentrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT blancoteijeiromariajose primaryilmpeelingduringretinaldetachmentrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis