Cargando…
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068 |
_version_ | 1784900892062908416 |
---|---|
author | Thind, Priyam Vargas, Celibell Y Reed, Carrie Wang, Liqun Alba, Luis R Larson, Elaine L Saiman, Lisa Stockwell, Melissa S |
author_facet | Thind, Priyam Vargas, Celibell Y Reed, Carrie Wang, Liqun Alba, Luis R Larson, Elaine L Saiman, Lisa Stockwell, Melissa S |
author_sort | Thind, Priyam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs in a low-income, community sample. METHODS: This was a substudy of a larger prospective community-based ARI surveillance study in 405 households in New York City. Participating household members self-collected swabs on the day of a research home visit for an index case, and for 3–6 subsequent days. Demographics associated with agreement to participate and swab collection were assessed, and index case self-collected versus research staff–collected swab results were compared. RESULTS: Most households (n = 292 [89.6%]) agreed to participate, including 1310 members. Being <18 years old, female, and the household reporter or member of the nuclear family (parents and children) were associated with both agreement to participate and self-swab collection. Being born in the United States or immigrating ≥10 years ago was associated with participation, and being Spanish-speaking and having less than a high school education were associated with swab collection. In all, 84.4% collected at least 1 self-swabbed specimen; self-swabbing rates were highest during the first 4 collection days. Concordance between research staff–collected swabs and self-swabs was 88.4% for negative swabs, 75.0% for influenza, and 69.4% for noninfluenza pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Self-swabbing was acceptable, feasible, and valid in this low-income, minoritized population. Some differences in participation and swab collection were identified that could be noted by future researchers and modelers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9985149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99851492023-03-05 Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample Thind, Priyam Vargas, Celibell Y Reed, Carrie Wang, Liqun Alba, Luis R Larson, Elaine L Saiman, Lisa Stockwell, Melissa S Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs in a low-income, community sample. METHODS: This was a substudy of a larger prospective community-based ARI surveillance study in 405 households in New York City. Participating household members self-collected swabs on the day of a research home visit for an index case, and for 3–6 subsequent days. Demographics associated with agreement to participate and swab collection were assessed, and index case self-collected versus research staff–collected swab results were compared. RESULTS: Most households (n = 292 [89.6%]) agreed to participate, including 1310 members. Being <18 years old, female, and the household reporter or member of the nuclear family (parents and children) were associated with both agreement to participate and self-swab collection. Being born in the United States or immigrating ≥10 years ago was associated with participation, and being Spanish-speaking and having less than a high school education were associated with swab collection. In all, 84.4% collected at least 1 self-swabbed specimen; self-swabbing rates were highest during the first 4 collection days. Concordance between research staff–collected swabs and self-swabs was 88.4% for negative swabs, 75.0% for influenza, and 69.4% for noninfluenza pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Self-swabbing was acceptable, feasible, and valid in this low-income, minoritized population. Some differences in participation and swab collection were identified that could be noted by future researchers and modelers. Oxford University Press 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9985149/ /pubmed/36879622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Major Article Thind, Priyam Vargas, Celibell Y Reed, Carrie Wang, Liqun Alba, Luis R Larson, Elaine L Saiman, Lisa Stockwell, Melissa S Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title | Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title_full | Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title_fullStr | Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title_short | Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample |
title_sort | acceptability, feasibility, and validity of detecting respiratory pathogens during acute respiratory illness in participant-collected swabs in a low-income, community sample |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thindpriyam acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT vargascelibelly acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT reedcarrie acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT wangliqun acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT albaluisr acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT larsonelainel acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT saimanlisa acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample AT stockwellmelissas acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample |