Cargando…

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample

BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thind, Priyam, Vargas, Celibell Y, Reed, Carrie, Wang, Liqun, Alba, Luis R, Larson, Elaine L, Saiman, Lisa, Stockwell, Melissa S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068
_version_ 1784900892062908416
author Thind, Priyam
Vargas, Celibell Y
Reed, Carrie
Wang, Liqun
Alba, Luis R
Larson, Elaine L
Saiman, Lisa
Stockwell, Melissa S
author_facet Thind, Priyam
Vargas, Celibell Y
Reed, Carrie
Wang, Liqun
Alba, Luis R
Larson, Elaine L
Saiman, Lisa
Stockwell, Melissa S
author_sort Thind, Priyam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs in a low-income, community sample. METHODS: This was a substudy of a larger prospective community-based ARI surveillance study in 405 households in New York City. Participating household members self-collected swabs on the day of a research home visit for an index case, and for 3–6 subsequent days. Demographics associated with agreement to participate and swab collection were assessed, and index case self-collected versus research staff–collected swab results were compared. RESULTS: Most households (n = 292 [89.6%]) agreed to participate, including 1310 members. Being <18 years old, female, and the household reporter or member of the nuclear family (parents and children) were associated with both agreement to participate and self-swab collection. Being born in the United States or immigrating ≥10 years ago was associated with participation, and being Spanish-speaking and having less than a high school education were associated with swab collection. In all, 84.4% collected at least 1 self-swabbed specimen; self-swabbing rates were highest during the first 4 collection days. Concordance between research staff–collected swabs and self-swabs was 88.4% for negative swabs, 75.0% for influenza, and 69.4% for noninfluenza pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Self-swabbing was acceptable, feasible, and valid in this low-income, minoritized population. Some differences in participation and swab collection were identified that could be noted by future researchers and modelers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99851492023-03-05 Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample Thind, Priyam Vargas, Celibell Y Reed, Carrie Wang, Liqun Alba, Luis R Larson, Elaine L Saiman, Lisa Stockwell, Melissa S Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Community surveillance for acute respiratory illness (ARI) can include unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs. Little is known about use of self-swabs in low-income populations or among households including extended family members and the validity of self-collected swabs. We assessed the acceptability, feasibility, and validity of unsupervised participant-collected nasal swabs in a low-income, community sample. METHODS: This was a substudy of a larger prospective community-based ARI surveillance study in 405 households in New York City. Participating household members self-collected swabs on the day of a research home visit for an index case, and for 3–6 subsequent days. Demographics associated with agreement to participate and swab collection were assessed, and index case self-collected versus research staff–collected swab results were compared. RESULTS: Most households (n = 292 [89.6%]) agreed to participate, including 1310 members. Being <18 years old, female, and the household reporter or member of the nuclear family (parents and children) were associated with both agreement to participate and self-swab collection. Being born in the United States or immigrating ≥10 years ago was associated with participation, and being Spanish-speaking and having less than a high school education were associated with swab collection. In all, 84.4% collected at least 1 self-swabbed specimen; self-swabbing rates were highest during the first 4 collection days. Concordance between research staff–collected swabs and self-swabs was 88.4% for negative swabs, 75.0% for influenza, and 69.4% for noninfluenza pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Self-swabbing was acceptable, feasible, and valid in this low-income, minoritized population. Some differences in participation and swab collection were identified that could be noted by future researchers and modelers. Oxford University Press 2023-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9985149/ /pubmed/36879622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Thind, Priyam
Vargas, Celibell Y
Reed, Carrie
Wang, Liqun
Alba, Luis R
Larson, Elaine L
Saiman, Lisa
Stockwell, Melissa S
Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title_full Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title_fullStr Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title_short Acceptability, Feasibility, and Validity of Detecting Respiratory Pathogens During Acute Respiratory Illness in Participant-Collected Swabs in a Low-Income, Community Sample
title_sort acceptability, feasibility, and validity of detecting respiratory pathogens during acute respiratory illness in participant-collected swabs in a low-income, community sample
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad068
work_keys_str_mv AT thindpriyam acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT vargascelibelly acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT reedcarrie acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT wangliqun acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT albaluisr acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT larsonelainel acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT saimanlisa acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample
AT stockwellmelissas acceptabilityfeasibilityandvalidityofdetectingrespiratorypathogensduringacuterespiratoryillnessinparticipantcollectedswabsinalowincomecommunitysample