Cargando…

Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies

BACKGROUND: Developing biomarkers is a priority for drug development for all conditions, but vital in the rare neurodevelopmental disorders where sensitive outcome measures are lacking. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility and tracking of evoked potentials to disease severity in Rett synd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saby, Joni N., Peters, Sarika U., Benke, Timothy A., Standridge, Shannon M., Swanson, Lindsay C., Lieberman, David N., Olson, Heather E., Key, Alexandra P., Percy, Alan K., Neul, Jeffrey L., Nelson, Charles A., Roberts, Timothy P. L., Marsh, Eric D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36870948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09479-9
_version_ 1784900914716344320
author Saby, Joni N.
Peters, Sarika U.
Benke, Timothy A.
Standridge, Shannon M.
Swanson, Lindsay C.
Lieberman, David N.
Olson, Heather E.
Key, Alexandra P.
Percy, Alan K.
Neul, Jeffrey L.
Nelson, Charles A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
Marsh, Eric D.
author_facet Saby, Joni N.
Peters, Sarika U.
Benke, Timothy A.
Standridge, Shannon M.
Swanson, Lindsay C.
Lieberman, David N.
Olson, Heather E.
Key, Alexandra P.
Percy, Alan K.
Neul, Jeffrey L.
Nelson, Charles A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
Marsh, Eric D.
author_sort Saby, Joni N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developing biomarkers is a priority for drug development for all conditions, but vital in the rare neurodevelopmental disorders where sensitive outcome measures are lacking. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility and tracking of evoked potentials to disease severity in Rett syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder. The aim of the current study is to characterize evoked potentials in two related developmental encephalopathies, MECP2 duplication syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome, and compare across all four groups to better understand the potential of these measures to serve as biomarkers of clinical severity for the developmental encephalopathies. METHODS: Visual and auditory evoked potentials were acquired from participants with MECP2 duplication syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome across five sites of the Rett Syndrome and Rett-Related Disorders Natural History Study. A group of age-matched individuals (mean = 7.8 years; range = 1–17) with Rett syndrome, CDKL5 deficiency disorder, and typically-developing participants served as a comparison group. The analysis focused on group-level differences as well as associations between the evoked potentials and measures of clinical severity from the Natural History Study. RESULTS: As reported previously, group-level comparisons revealed attenuated visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in participants with Rett syndrome (n = 43) and CDKL5 deficiency disorder (n = 16) compared to typically-developing participants. VEP amplitude was also attenuated in participants with MECP2 duplication syndrome (n = 15) compared to the typically-developing group. VEP amplitude correlated with clinical severity for Rett syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome (n = 5). Auditory evoked potential (AEP) amplitude did not differ between groups, but AEP latency was prolonged in individuals with MECP2 duplication syndrome (n = 14) and FOXG1 syndrome (n = 6) compared to individuals with Rett syndrome (n = 51) and CDKL5 deficiency disorder (n = 14). AEP amplitude correlated with severity in Rett syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder. AEP latency correlated with severity in CDKL5 deficiency disorder, MECP2 duplication syndrome, and FOXG1 syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: There are consistent abnormalities in the evoked potentials in four developmental encephalopathies some of which correlate with clinical severity. While there are consistent changes amongst these four disorders, there are also condition specific findings that need to be further refined and validated. Overall, these results provide a foundation for further refinement of these measures for use in future clinical trials for these conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99852572023-03-05 Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies Saby, Joni N. Peters, Sarika U. Benke, Timothy A. Standridge, Shannon M. Swanson, Lindsay C. Lieberman, David N. Olson, Heather E. Key, Alexandra P. Percy, Alan K. Neul, Jeffrey L. Nelson, Charles A. Roberts, Timothy P. L. Marsh, Eric D. J Neurodev Disord Research BACKGROUND: Developing biomarkers is a priority for drug development for all conditions, but vital in the rare neurodevelopmental disorders where sensitive outcome measures are lacking. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility and tracking of evoked potentials to disease severity in Rett syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder. The aim of the current study is to characterize evoked potentials in two related developmental encephalopathies, MECP2 duplication syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome, and compare across all four groups to better understand the potential of these measures to serve as biomarkers of clinical severity for the developmental encephalopathies. METHODS: Visual and auditory evoked potentials were acquired from participants with MECP2 duplication syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome across five sites of the Rett Syndrome and Rett-Related Disorders Natural History Study. A group of age-matched individuals (mean = 7.8 years; range = 1–17) with Rett syndrome, CDKL5 deficiency disorder, and typically-developing participants served as a comparison group. The analysis focused on group-level differences as well as associations between the evoked potentials and measures of clinical severity from the Natural History Study. RESULTS: As reported previously, group-level comparisons revealed attenuated visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in participants with Rett syndrome (n = 43) and CDKL5 deficiency disorder (n = 16) compared to typically-developing participants. VEP amplitude was also attenuated in participants with MECP2 duplication syndrome (n = 15) compared to the typically-developing group. VEP amplitude correlated with clinical severity for Rett syndrome and FOXG1 syndrome (n = 5). Auditory evoked potential (AEP) amplitude did not differ between groups, but AEP latency was prolonged in individuals with MECP2 duplication syndrome (n = 14) and FOXG1 syndrome (n = 6) compared to individuals with Rett syndrome (n = 51) and CDKL5 deficiency disorder (n = 14). AEP amplitude correlated with severity in Rett syndrome and CDKL5 deficiency disorder. AEP latency correlated with severity in CDKL5 deficiency disorder, MECP2 duplication syndrome, and FOXG1 syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: There are consistent abnormalities in the evoked potentials in four developmental encephalopathies some of which correlate with clinical severity. While there are consistent changes amongst these four disorders, there are also condition specific findings that need to be further refined and validated. Overall, these results provide a foundation for further refinement of these measures for use in future clinical trials for these conditions. BioMed Central 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9985257/ /pubmed/36870948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09479-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Saby, Joni N.
Peters, Sarika U.
Benke, Timothy A.
Standridge, Shannon M.
Swanson, Lindsay C.
Lieberman, David N.
Olson, Heather E.
Key, Alexandra P.
Percy, Alan K.
Neul, Jeffrey L.
Nelson, Charles A.
Roberts, Timothy P. L.
Marsh, Eric D.
Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title_full Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title_fullStr Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title_short Comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
title_sort comparison of evoked potentials across four related developmental encephalopathies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36870948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09479-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sabyjonin comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT peterssarikau comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT benketimothya comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT standridgeshannonm comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT swansonlindsayc comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT liebermandavidn comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT olsonheathere comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT keyalexandrap comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT percyalank comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT neuljeffreyl comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT nelsoncharlesa comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT robertstimothypl comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies
AT marshericd comparisonofevokedpotentialsacrossfourrelateddevelopmentalencephalopathies