Cargando…

Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry

BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Simran, Alhaug, Ole Kristian, Dolatowski, Filip C., Solberg, Tore K., Lønne, Greger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36871007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3
_version_ 1784900922445398016
author Kaur, Simran
Alhaug, Ole Kristian
Dolatowski, Filip C.
Solberg, Tore K.
Lønne, Greger
author_facet Kaur, Simran
Alhaug, Ole Kristian
Dolatowski, Filip C.
Solberg, Tore K.
Lønne, Greger
author_sort Kaur, Simran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis at four public hospitals in Norway during a two-year period. These patients reported sociodemographic data, preoperative symptoms, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain to NORspine at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. We contacted all patients who did not respond to NORspine after 12 months. Those who responded were termed responsive non-respondents and compared to 12 months respondents. RESULTS: One hundred forty (30%) did not respond to NORspine 12 months after surgery and 123 were available for additional follow-up. Sixty-four of the 123 non-respondents (52%) responded to a cross-sectional survey done at a median of 50 (36–64) months after surgery. At baseline, non-respondents were younger 63 (SD 11.7) vs. 68 (SD 9.9) years (mean difference (95% CI) 4.7 years (2.6 to 6.7); p =  < 0.001) and more frequently smokers 41 (30%) vs. 70 (21%) RR (95%CI) = 1.40 (1.01 to 1.95); p = 0.044. There were no other relevant differences in other sociodemographic variables or preoperative symptoms. We found no differences in the effect of surgery on non-respondents vs. respondents (ODI (SD) = 28.2 (19.9) vs. 25.2 (18.9), MD (95%CI) = 3.0 ( -2.1 to 8.1); p = 0.250). CONCLUSION: We found that 30% of patients did not respond to NORspine at 12 months after spine surgery. Non-respondents were somewhat younger and smoked more frequently than respondents; however, there were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures. Our findings suggest that attrition bias in NORspine was random and due to non-modifiable factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99852922023-03-05 Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry Kaur, Simran Alhaug, Ole Kristian Dolatowski, Filip C. Solberg, Tore K. Lønne, Greger BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Loss to follow-up may bias outcome assessments in medical registries. This cohort study aimed to analyze and compare patients who failed to respond with those that responded to the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine). METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 474 consecutive patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis at four public hospitals in Norway during a two-year period. These patients reported sociodemographic data, preoperative symptoms, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numerical rating scales (NRS) for back and leg pain to NORspine at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. We contacted all patients who did not respond to NORspine after 12 months. Those who responded were termed responsive non-respondents and compared to 12 months respondents. RESULTS: One hundred forty (30%) did not respond to NORspine 12 months after surgery and 123 were available for additional follow-up. Sixty-four of the 123 non-respondents (52%) responded to a cross-sectional survey done at a median of 50 (36–64) months after surgery. At baseline, non-respondents were younger 63 (SD 11.7) vs. 68 (SD 9.9) years (mean difference (95% CI) 4.7 years (2.6 to 6.7); p =  < 0.001) and more frequently smokers 41 (30%) vs. 70 (21%) RR (95%CI) = 1.40 (1.01 to 1.95); p = 0.044. There were no other relevant differences in other sociodemographic variables or preoperative symptoms. We found no differences in the effect of surgery on non-respondents vs. respondents (ODI (SD) = 28.2 (19.9) vs. 25.2 (18.9), MD (95%CI) = 3.0 ( -2.1 to 8.1); p = 0.250). CONCLUSION: We found that 30% of patients did not respond to NORspine at 12 months after spine surgery. Non-respondents were somewhat younger and smoked more frequently than respondents; however, there were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures. Our findings suggest that attrition bias in NORspine was random and due to non-modifiable factors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3. BioMed Central 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9985292/ /pubmed/36871007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kaur, Simran
Alhaug, Ole Kristian
Dolatowski, Filip C.
Solberg, Tore K.
Lønne, Greger
Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_full Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_fullStr Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_short Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
title_sort characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36871007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kaursimran characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT alhaugolekristian characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT dolatowskifilipc characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT solbergtorek characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry
AT lønnegreger characteristicsandoutcomesofpatientswhodidnotrespondtoanationalspinesurgeryregistry