Cargando…

“Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings

PURPOSE: Customizing the accessibility and ease-of-use settings of a computer can improve the overall user experience for people with and without disabilities. However, the adoption of such settings remains poor. This study investigates why various factors may influence people as they personalize an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Rachel, Griffith, Meagan, Jordan, J. Bern, Vanderheiden, Gregg, Lazar, Jonathan, Kaine-Krolak, Maureen, Ryson, Matthew, Desai, Amarja, Folmar, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1
_version_ 1784900963841081344
author Wood, Rachel
Griffith, Meagan
Jordan, J. Bern
Vanderheiden, Gregg
Lazar, Jonathan
Kaine-Krolak, Maureen
Ryson, Matthew
Desai, Amarja
Folmar, David
author_facet Wood, Rachel
Griffith, Meagan
Jordan, J. Bern
Vanderheiden, Gregg
Lazar, Jonathan
Kaine-Krolak, Maureen
Ryson, Matthew
Desai, Amarja
Folmar, David
author_sort Wood, Rachel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Customizing the accessibility and ease-of-use settings of a computer can improve the overall user experience for people with and without disabilities. However, the adoption of such settings remains poor. This study investigates why various factors may influence people as they personalize and when they choose to integrate those changes into everyday use. METHODS: To better understand how these factors may impact people’s personalization process, we conducted a series of interviews involving 15 people with and without disabilities across several months in 2020 when computer usage became required due to the COVID-19 lockdown. We used grounded theory to analyze 49 semi-structured interviews with participants. During these interviews, people reflected upon: past attempts at personalization using built-in accessibility or ease-of-use features of their Operating System (OS) or other assistive technologies (AT), current customization activities using the personalization software, Morphic, and future opportunities for personalization systems and features. RESULTS: We identified several barriers, facilitators, and perpetuating factors that can influence why and when people choose to adopt and integrate their personalization changes. We also outline the overall personalization lifecycle, which illustrates when various factors may impact computer personalization. CONCLUSION: Personalization activities are complex and easily affected by an ecosystem of influential factors that surround them. When paired with the three design considerations and ten lessons learned from this qualitative study, the overall personalization lifecycle may be useful during the design and development of future personalization systems or features for people with and without disabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99854752023-03-06 “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings Wood, Rachel Griffith, Meagan Jordan, J. Bern Vanderheiden, Gregg Lazar, Jonathan Kaine-Krolak, Maureen Ryson, Matthew Desai, Amarja Folmar, David Univers Access Inf Soc Long Paper PURPOSE: Customizing the accessibility and ease-of-use settings of a computer can improve the overall user experience for people with and without disabilities. However, the adoption of such settings remains poor. This study investigates why various factors may influence people as they personalize and when they choose to integrate those changes into everyday use. METHODS: To better understand how these factors may impact people’s personalization process, we conducted a series of interviews involving 15 people with and without disabilities across several months in 2020 when computer usage became required due to the COVID-19 lockdown. We used grounded theory to analyze 49 semi-structured interviews with participants. During these interviews, people reflected upon: past attempts at personalization using built-in accessibility or ease-of-use features of their Operating System (OS) or other assistive technologies (AT), current customization activities using the personalization software, Morphic, and future opportunities for personalization systems and features. RESULTS: We identified several barriers, facilitators, and perpetuating factors that can influence why and when people choose to adopt and integrate their personalization changes. We also outline the overall personalization lifecycle, which illustrates when various factors may impact computer personalization. CONCLUSION: Personalization activities are complex and easily affected by an ecosystem of influential factors that surround them. When paired with the three design considerations and ten lessons learned from this qualitative study, the overall personalization lifecycle may be useful during the design and development of future personalization systems or features for people with and without disabilities. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9985475/ /pubmed/37361673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Long Paper
Wood, Rachel
Griffith, Meagan
Jordan, J. Bern
Vanderheiden, Gregg
Lazar, Jonathan
Kaine-Krolak, Maureen
Ryson, Matthew
Desai, Amarja
Folmar, David
“Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title_full “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title_fullStr “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title_full_unstemmed “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title_short “Creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
title_sort “creatures of habit”: influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings
topic Long Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1
work_keys_str_mv AT woodrachel creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT griffithmeagan creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT jordanjbern creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT vanderheidengregg creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT lazarjonathan creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT kainekrolakmaureen creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT rysonmatthew creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT desaiamarja creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings
AT folmardavid creaturesofhabitinfluentialfactorstotheadoptionofcomputerpersonalizationandaccessibilitysettings