Cargando…
Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a core life-support therapy for patients suffering from respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Respiratory failure is a secondary outcome of a range of injuries and diseases, and results in almost half of all intensive care unit (ICU) patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.001 |
_version_ | 1784900965343690752 |
---|---|
author | Morton, Sophie E. Knopp, Jennifer L. Chase, J. Geoffrey Docherty, Paul Howe, Sarah L. Möller, Knut Shaw, Geoffrey M. Tawhai, Merryn |
author_facet | Morton, Sophie E. Knopp, Jennifer L. Chase, J. Geoffrey Docherty, Paul Howe, Sarah L. Möller, Knut Shaw, Geoffrey M. Tawhai, Merryn |
author_sort | Morton, Sophie E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a core life-support therapy for patients suffering from respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Respiratory failure is a secondary outcome of a range of injuries and diseases, and results in almost half of all intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving some form of MV. Funding the increasing demand for ICU is a major issue and MV, in particular, can double the cost per day due to significant patient variability, over-sedation, and the large amount of clinician time required for patient management. Reducing cost in this area requires both a decrease in the average duration of MV by improving care, and a reduction in clinical workload. Both could be achieved by safely automating all or part of MV care via model-based dynamic systems modelling and control methods are ideally suited to address these problems. This paper presents common lung models, and provides a vision for a more automated future and explores predictive capacity of some current models. This vision includes the use of model-based methods to gain real-time insight to patient condition, improve safety through the forward prediction of outcomes to changes in MV, and develop virtual patients for in-silico design and testing of clinical protocols. Finally, the use of dynamic systems models and system identification to guide therapy for improved personalised control of oxygenation and MV therapy in the ICU will be considered. Such methods are a major part of the future of medicine, which includes greater personalisation and predictive capacity to both optimise care and reduce costs. This review thus presents the state of the art in how dynamic systems and control methods can be applied to transform this core area of ICU medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9985488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99854882023-03-06 Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation Morton, Sophie E. Knopp, Jennifer L. Chase, J. Geoffrey Docherty, Paul Howe, Sarah L. Möller, Knut Shaw, Geoffrey M. Tawhai, Merryn Annu Rev Control Article Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a core life-support therapy for patients suffering from respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Respiratory failure is a secondary outcome of a range of injuries and diseases, and results in almost half of all intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving some form of MV. Funding the increasing demand for ICU is a major issue and MV, in particular, can double the cost per day due to significant patient variability, over-sedation, and the large amount of clinician time required for patient management. Reducing cost in this area requires both a decrease in the average duration of MV by improving care, and a reduction in clinical workload. Both could be achieved by safely automating all or part of MV care via model-based dynamic systems modelling and control methods are ideally suited to address these problems. This paper presents common lung models, and provides a vision for a more automated future and explores predictive capacity of some current models. This vision includes the use of model-based methods to gain real-time insight to patient condition, improve safety through the forward prediction of outcomes to changes in MV, and develop virtual patients for in-silico design and testing of clinical protocols. Finally, the use of dynamic systems models and system identification to guide therapy for improved personalised control of oxygenation and MV therapy in the ICU will be considered. Such methods are a major part of the future of medicine, which includes greater personalisation and predictive capacity to both optimise care and reduce costs. This review thus presents the state of the art in how dynamic systems and control methods can be applied to transform this core area of ICU medicine. Elsevier Ltd. 2019 2019-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9985488/ /pubmed/36911536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.001 Text en © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Morton, Sophie E. Knopp, Jennifer L. Chase, J. Geoffrey Docherty, Paul Howe, Sarah L. Möller, Knut Shaw, Geoffrey M. Tawhai, Merryn Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title | Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title_full | Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title_fullStr | Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title_short | Optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
title_sort | optimising mechanical ventilation through model-based methods and automation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mortonsophiee optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT knoppjenniferl optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT chasejgeoffrey optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT dochertypaul optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT howesarahl optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT mollerknut optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT shawgeoffreym optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation AT tawhaimerryn optimisingmechanicalventilationthroughmodelbasedmethodsandautomation |