Cargando…
Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1 |
_version_ | 1784900980800749568 |
---|---|
author | Göstemeyer, Gerd Preus, Mareike Elhennawy, Karim Schwendicke, Falk Paris, Sebastian Askar, Haitham |
author_facet | Göstemeyer, Gerd Preus, Mareike Elhennawy, Karim Schwendicke, Falk Paris, Sebastian Askar, Haitham |
author_sort | Göstemeyer, Gerd |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9985551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99855512023-03-06 Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro Göstemeyer, Gerd Preus, Mareike Elhennawy, Karim Schwendicke, Falk Paris, Sebastian Askar, Haitham Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9985551/ /pubmed/36112228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Göstemeyer, Gerd Preus, Mareike Elhennawy, Karim Schwendicke, Falk Paris, Sebastian Askar, Haitham Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title | Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title_full | Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title_short | Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
title_sort | accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gostemeyergerd accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro AT preusmareike accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro AT elhennawykarim accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro AT schwendickefalk accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro AT parissebastian accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro AT askarhaitham accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro |