Cargando…

Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Göstemeyer, Gerd, Preus, Mareike, Elhennawy, Karim, Schwendicke, Falk, Paris, Sebastian, Askar, Haitham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1
_version_ 1784900980800749568
author Göstemeyer, Gerd
Preus, Mareike
Elhennawy, Karim
Schwendicke, Falk
Paris, Sebastian
Askar, Haitham
author_facet Göstemeyer, Gerd
Preus, Mareike
Elhennawy, Karim
Schwendicke, Falk
Paris, Sebastian
Askar, Haitham
author_sort Göstemeyer, Gerd
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99855512023-03-06 Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro Göstemeyer, Gerd Preus, Mareike Elhennawy, Karim Schwendicke, Falk Paris, Sebastian Askar, Haitham Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9985551/ /pubmed/36112228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Göstemeyer, Gerd
Preus, Mareike
Elhennawy, Karim
Schwendicke, Falk
Paris, Sebastian
Askar, Haitham
Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title_full Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title_fullStr Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title_short Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
title_sort accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04709-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gostemeyergerd accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro
AT preusmareike accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro
AT elhennawykarim accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro
AT schwendickefalk accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro
AT parissebastian accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro
AT askarhaitham accuracyofdifferentapproachesfordetectingproximalrootcarieslesionsinvitro