Cargando…
Compatibility effects with touchless gestures
Human actions are suspect to various compatibility phenomena. For example, responding is faster to the side where a stimulus appears than to the opposite side, referred to as stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility. This is even true, if the response is given to a different stimulus feature, while loc...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1 |
_version_ | 1784900982499442688 |
---|---|
author | Janczyk, Markus |
author_facet | Janczyk, Markus |
author_sort | Janczyk, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human actions are suspect to various compatibility phenomena. For example, responding is faster to the side where a stimulus appears than to the opposite side, referred to as stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility. This is even true, if the response is given to a different stimulus feature, while location itself is irrelevant (Simon compatibility). In addition, responses typically produce perceivable effects on the environment. If they do so in a predictable way, responses are faster if they produce a (e.g., spatially) compatible effect on the same side than on the other side. That it, a left response is produced faster if it results predictably in a left effect than in a right effect. This effect is called response-effect (R–E) compatibility. Finally, compatibility could also exist between stimuli and the effects, which is accordingly called stimulus-effect (S–E) compatibility. Such compatibility phenomena are also relevant for applied purposes, be it in laparoscopic surgery or aviation. The present study investigates Simon and R–E compatibility for touchless gesture interactions. In line with a recent study, no effect of R–E compatibility was observed, yet irrelevant stimulus location yielded a large Simon effect. Touchless gestures thus seem to behave differently with regard to compatibility phenomena than interactions via (other) tools such as levers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9985559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99855592023-03-06 Compatibility effects with touchless gestures Janczyk, Markus Exp Brain Res Research Article Human actions are suspect to various compatibility phenomena. For example, responding is faster to the side where a stimulus appears than to the opposite side, referred to as stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility. This is even true, if the response is given to a different stimulus feature, while location itself is irrelevant (Simon compatibility). In addition, responses typically produce perceivable effects on the environment. If they do so in a predictable way, responses are faster if they produce a (e.g., spatially) compatible effect on the same side than on the other side. That it, a left response is produced faster if it results predictably in a left effect than in a right effect. This effect is called response-effect (R–E) compatibility. Finally, compatibility could also exist between stimuli and the effects, which is accordingly called stimulus-effect (S–E) compatibility. Such compatibility phenomena are also relevant for applied purposes, be it in laparoscopic surgery or aviation. The present study investigates Simon and R–E compatibility for touchless gesture interactions. In line with a recent study, no effect of R–E compatibility was observed, yet irrelevant stimulus location yielded a large Simon effect. Touchless gestures thus seem to behave differently with regard to compatibility phenomena than interactions via (other) tools such as levers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9985559/ /pubmed/36720746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Janczyk, Markus Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title | Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title_full | Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title_fullStr | Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title_full_unstemmed | Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title_short | Compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
title_sort | compatibility effects with touchless gestures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36720746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06549-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janczykmarkus compatibilityeffectswithtouchlessgestures |