Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the results of using MTA and propolis in the pulpotomy of primary molar teeth are evaluated clinically and radiographically. METHODS AND METHODS: A total of 25 healthy 4 to 8 year old children each having two carious primary molar teeth in one arch, based on inclusion cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghazadeh, Samaneh, Haghgoo, Roza, Mehran, Majid, Kadkhodaei, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883039
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.21335
_version_ 1784901006187823104
author Aghazadeh, Samaneh
Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Kadkhodaei, Fatemeh
author_facet Aghazadeh, Samaneh
Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Kadkhodaei, Fatemeh
author_sort Aghazadeh, Samaneh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In this study, the results of using MTA and propolis in the pulpotomy of primary molar teeth are evaluated clinically and radiographically. METHODS AND METHODS: A total of 25 healthy 4 to 8 year old children each having two carious primary molar teeth in one arch, based on inclusion criteria were selected. In each child, random assignment of the pulpotomy medicaments was done as follows: Group I, MTA in one side; Group II, Propolis in another side. All the pulpotomized teeth were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 month clinically and radiographically, based on the scoring criteria system. Finally data was analyzed using GEE analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that the effects of treatment and time on two scores were tested. Based on the results of this model, the chances of having clinical score 2, versus score 1 are about 2.7 times higher in MTA treatment than in propolis (P=0.001). Similarly, the chance of having a clinical score 2 relative to its one, at 9(th) month is approximately 6.8 times higher than the 3(th) month (P=0.000) and at 6(th) month is approximately 2.8 times higher than the 3(th) month (P=0.005). The chance of having higher scores of radiographies in treatment of propolis is approximately 6.5 times than that of MTA (P=0.000). Also, the chance of having higher scores of radiographic index at 6(th) month is approximately 5 times and at 9(th) month is approximately 27 times more than the 3(th) month (P=0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this experimental study, teeth treated with MTA showed more suitable clinical and radiographic results as compared to propolis at 9 months follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99856742023-03-06 Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars Aghazadeh, Samaneh Haghgoo, Roza Mehran, Majid Kadkhodaei, Fatemeh Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: In this study, the results of using MTA and propolis in the pulpotomy of primary molar teeth are evaluated clinically and radiographically. METHODS AND METHODS: A total of 25 healthy 4 to 8 year old children each having two carious primary molar teeth in one arch, based on inclusion criteria were selected. In each child, random assignment of the pulpotomy medicaments was done as follows: Group I, MTA in one side; Group II, Propolis in another side. All the pulpotomized teeth were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 month clinically and radiographically, based on the scoring criteria system. Finally data was analyzed using GEE analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that the effects of treatment and time on two scores were tested. Based on the results of this model, the chances of having clinical score 2, versus score 1 are about 2.7 times higher in MTA treatment than in propolis (P=0.001). Similarly, the chance of having a clinical score 2 relative to its one, at 9(th) month is approximately 6.8 times higher than the 3(th) month (P=0.000) and at 6(th) month is approximately 2.8 times higher than the 3(th) month (P=0.005). The chance of having higher scores of radiographies in treatment of propolis is approximately 6.5 times than that of MTA (P=0.000). Also, the chance of having higher scores of radiographic index at 6(th) month is approximately 5 times and at 9(th) month is approximately 27 times more than the 3(th) month (P=0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this experimental study, teeth treated with MTA showed more suitable clinical and radiographic results as compared to propolis at 9 months follow-up. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC9985674/ /pubmed/36883039 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.21335 Text en © The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Aghazadeh, Samaneh
Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Kadkhodaei, Fatemeh
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA and Propolis in Pulpotomy of Primary Molars
title_sort comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic success of mta and propolis in pulpotomy of primary molars
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883039
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.21335
work_keys_str_mv AT aghazadehsamaneh comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicsuccessofmtaandpropolisinpulpotomyofprimarymolars
AT haghgooroza comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicsuccessofmtaandpropolisinpulpotomyofprimarymolars
AT mehranmajid comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicsuccessofmtaandpropolisinpulpotomyofprimarymolars
AT kadkhodaeifatemeh comparativeevaluationofclinicalandradiographicsuccessofmtaandpropolisinpulpotomyofprimarymolars