Cargando…
Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different seal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883017 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743 |
_version_ | 1784901010528927744 |
---|---|
author | Tofangchiha, Maryam Bolbolian, Marjan Rahrovan, Sahar Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Hajihassani, Neda |
author_facet | Tofangchiha, Maryam Bolbolian, Marjan Rahrovan, Sahar Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Hajihassani, Neda |
author_sort | Tofangchiha, Maryam |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sealers including AH-26, Diadent, and Anyseal in creation of artifact bands in the CBCT images based on voxel size. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 44 single rooted extracted teeth were selected. The canals were prepared by crown-down technique. All teeth were manually filed up to master apical file (MAF) size 45 and 1 mm shorter than the apical foramen. The teeth were divided into 4 equal groups. The canals were filled with gutta-percha and either of sealers AH-26, Diadent or Anyseal by lateral condensation technique. The control group were filled just with gutta-percha without any sealer. The CBCT images were taken in voxel sizes of 0.3 and 0.15. The Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Although, the control group had the lowest ratio of presence to absence of artifact, the ratio of presence to absence of artifact in voxel size of 0.3 and 0.15 mm were significantly lower in Anyseal than AH-26 (P=0.031, P=0.020) and Diadent (P=0.001, P=0.002). No significant difference was detected between two voxel sizes (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, all evaluated sealers induced artifacts in the CBCT images. Anyseal sealer had the lowest artifact in both evaluated voxel sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9985691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Iranian Center for Endodontic Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99856912023-03-06 Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers Tofangchiha, Maryam Bolbolian, Marjan Rahrovan, Sahar Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Hajihassani, Neda Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sealers including AH-26, Diadent, and Anyseal in creation of artifact bands in the CBCT images based on voxel size. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 44 single rooted extracted teeth were selected. The canals were prepared by crown-down technique. All teeth were manually filed up to master apical file (MAF) size 45 and 1 mm shorter than the apical foramen. The teeth were divided into 4 equal groups. The canals were filled with gutta-percha and either of sealers AH-26, Diadent or Anyseal by lateral condensation technique. The control group were filled just with gutta-percha without any sealer. The CBCT images were taken in voxel sizes of 0.3 and 0.15. The Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Although, the control group had the lowest ratio of presence to absence of artifact, the ratio of presence to absence of artifact in voxel size of 0.3 and 0.15 mm were significantly lower in Anyseal than AH-26 (P=0.031, P=0.020) and Diadent (P=0.001, P=0.002). No significant difference was detected between two voxel sizes (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, all evaluated sealers induced artifacts in the CBCT images. Anyseal sealer had the lowest artifact in both evaluated voxel sizes. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC9985691/ /pubmed/36883017 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743 Text en © The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tofangchiha, Maryam Bolbolian, Marjan Rahrovan, Sahar Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Hajihassani, Neda Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title | Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title_full | Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title_fullStr | Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title_full_unstemmed | Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title_short | Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers |
title_sort | cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of artifact effects of three different sealers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883017 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tofangchihamaryam conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers AT bolbolianmarjan conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers AT rahrovansahar conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers AT mirzadehmonirsadat conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers AT hajihassanineda conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers |