Cargando…

Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers

INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different seal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tofangchiha, Maryam, Bolbolian, Marjan, Rahrovan, Sahar, Mirzadeh, Monirsadat, Hajihassani, Neda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883017
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743
_version_ 1784901010528927744
author Tofangchiha, Maryam
Bolbolian, Marjan
Rahrovan, Sahar
Mirzadeh, Monirsadat
Hajihassani, Neda
author_facet Tofangchiha, Maryam
Bolbolian, Marjan
Rahrovan, Sahar
Mirzadeh, Monirsadat
Hajihassani, Neda
author_sort Tofangchiha, Maryam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sealers including AH-26, Diadent, and Anyseal in creation of artifact bands in the CBCT images based on voxel size. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 44 single rooted extracted teeth were selected. The canals were prepared by crown-down technique. All teeth were manually filed up to master apical file (MAF) size 45 and 1 mm shorter than the apical foramen. The teeth were divided into 4 equal groups. The canals were filled with gutta-percha and either of sealers AH-26, Diadent or Anyseal by lateral condensation technique. The control group were filled just with gutta-percha without any sealer. The CBCT images were taken in voxel sizes of 0.3 and 0.15. The Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Although, the control group had the lowest ratio of presence to absence of artifact, the ratio of presence to absence of artifact in voxel size of 0.3 and 0.15 mm were significantly lower in Anyseal than AH-26 (P=0.031, P=0.020) and Diadent (P=0.001, P=0.002). No significant difference was detected between two voxel sizes (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, all evaluated sealers induced artifacts in the CBCT images. Anyseal sealer had the lowest artifact in both evaluated voxel sizes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99856912023-03-06 Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers Tofangchiha, Maryam Bolbolian, Marjan Rahrovan, Sahar Mirzadeh, Monirsadat Hajihassani, Neda Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important diagnostic tools in maxillofacial imaging. Nowadays different sealers are used in root canal therapy and some of them can create artifact in CBCT images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different sealers including AH-26, Diadent, and Anyseal in creation of artifact bands in the CBCT images based on voxel size. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 44 single rooted extracted teeth were selected. The canals were prepared by crown-down technique. All teeth were manually filed up to master apical file (MAF) size 45 and 1 mm shorter than the apical foramen. The teeth were divided into 4 equal groups. The canals were filled with gutta-percha and either of sealers AH-26, Diadent or Anyseal by lateral condensation technique. The control group were filled just with gutta-percha without any sealer. The CBCT images were taken in voxel sizes of 0.3 and 0.15. The Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Although, the control group had the lowest ratio of presence to absence of artifact, the ratio of presence to absence of artifact in voxel size of 0.3 and 0.15 mm were significantly lower in Anyseal than AH-26 (P=0.031, P=0.020) and Diadent (P=0.001, P=0.002). No significant difference was detected between two voxel sizes (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: In this in vitro study, all evaluated sealers induced artifacts in the CBCT images. Anyseal sealer had the lowest artifact in both evaluated voxel sizes. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC9985691/ /pubmed/36883017 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743 Text en © The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Tofangchiha, Maryam
Bolbolian, Marjan
Rahrovan, Sahar
Mirzadeh, Monirsadat
Hajihassani, Neda
Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title_full Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title_fullStr Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title_full_unstemmed Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title_short Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Artifact Effects of Three Different Sealers
title_sort cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of artifact effects of three different sealers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883017
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v13i4.19743
work_keys_str_mv AT tofangchihamaryam conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers
AT bolbolianmarjan conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers
AT rahrovansahar conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers
AT mirzadehmonirsadat conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers
AT hajihassanineda conebeamcomputedtomographicevaluationofartifacteffectsofthreedifferentsealers