Cargando…

‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund

Equal access to vaccines has been one of the key ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most scholars consider the massive purchase and hoarding of vaccines by high-income countries, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, to be unjust towards the vulnerable living in low-income count...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Germani, Federico, Holzer, Felicitas, Ortiz, Ivette, Biller-Andorno, Nikola, März, Julian W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108491
_version_ 1784901027778002944
author Germani, Federico
Holzer, Felicitas
Ortiz, Ivette
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
März, Julian W
author_facet Germani, Federico
Holzer, Felicitas
Ortiz, Ivette
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
März, Julian W
author_sort Germani, Federico
collection PubMed
description Equal access to vaccines has been one of the key ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most scholars consider the massive purchase and hoarding of vaccines by high-income countries, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, to be unjust towards the vulnerable living in low-income countries. A recent proposal by Andreas Albertsen of a vaccine tax has been put forward to remedy this problem. Under such a scheme, high-income countries would pay a contribution, conceptualised as a vaccine tax, dedicated to buying vaccines and distributing them to low and middle-income countries. Proceeding from this proposal, we critically assess the feasibility of a vaccine tax and suggest how to conceptualise and implement a vaccine tax in practice. We present our ‘VaxTax model’ and explore its comparative advantages and disadvantages while considering other possible measures to address the global vaccine access problem, also in view of future pandemics and disease outbreaks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99857622023-03-06 ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund Germani, Federico Holzer, Felicitas Ortiz, Ivette Biller-Andorno, Nikola März, Julian W J Med Ethics Current Controversy Equal access to vaccines has been one of the key ethical challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most scholars consider the massive purchase and hoarding of vaccines by high-income countries, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, to be unjust towards the vulnerable living in low-income countries. A recent proposal by Andreas Albertsen of a vaccine tax has been put forward to remedy this problem. Under such a scheme, high-income countries would pay a contribution, conceptualised as a vaccine tax, dedicated to buying vaccines and distributing them to low and middle-income countries. Proceeding from this proposal, we critically assess the feasibility of a vaccine tax and suggest how to conceptualise and implement a vaccine tax in practice. We present our ‘VaxTax model’ and explore its comparative advantages and disadvantages while considering other possible measures to address the global vaccine access problem, also in view of future pandemics and disease outbreaks. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03 2022-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9985762/ /pubmed/36414391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108491 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Current Controversy
Germani, Federico
Holzer, Felicitas
Ortiz, Ivette
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
März, Julian W
‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title_full ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title_fullStr ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title_full_unstemmed ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title_short ‘VaxTax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
title_sort ‘vaxtax’: a follow-up proposal for a global vaccine pandemic response fund
topic Current Controversy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108491
work_keys_str_mv AT germanifederico vaxtaxafollowupproposalforaglobalvaccinepandemicresponsefund
AT holzerfelicitas vaxtaxafollowupproposalforaglobalvaccinepandemicresponsefund
AT ortizivette vaxtaxafollowupproposalforaglobalvaccinepandemicresponsefund
AT billerandornonikola vaxtaxafollowupproposalforaglobalvaccinepandemicresponsefund
AT marzjulianw vaxtaxafollowupproposalforaglobalvaccinepandemicresponsefund