Cargando…

Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays

The AI-Rad Companion Chest X-ray (AI-Rad, Siemens Healthineers) is an artificial-intelligence based application for the analysis of chest X-rays. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the performance of the AI-Rad. In total, 499 radiographs were retrospectively included. Radiographs were i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niehoff, Julius Henning, Kalaitzidis, Jana, Kroeger, Jan Robert, Schoenbeck, Denise, Borggrefe, Jan, Michael, Arwed Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30521-2
_version_ 1784901035078189056
author Niehoff, Julius Henning
Kalaitzidis, Jana
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Schoenbeck, Denise
Borggrefe, Jan
Michael, Arwed Elias
author_facet Niehoff, Julius Henning
Kalaitzidis, Jana
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Schoenbeck, Denise
Borggrefe, Jan
Michael, Arwed Elias
author_sort Niehoff, Julius Henning
collection PubMed
description The AI-Rad Companion Chest X-ray (AI-Rad, Siemens Healthineers) is an artificial-intelligence based application for the analysis of chest X-rays. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the performance of the AI-Rad. In total, 499 radiographs were retrospectively included. Radiographs were independently evaluated by radiologists and the AI-Rad. Findings indicated by the AI-Rad and findings described in the written report (WR) were compared to the findings of a ground truth reading (consensus decision of two radiologists after assessing additional radiographs and CT scans). The AI-Rad can offer superior sensitivity for the detection of lung lesions (0.83 versus 0.52), consolidations (0.88 versus 0.78) and atelectasis (0.54 versus 0.43) compared to the WR. However, the superior sensitivity is accompanied by higher false-detection-rates. The sensitivity of the AI-Rad for the detection of pleural effusions is lower compared to the WR (0.74 versus 0.88). The negative-predictive-values (NPV) of the AI-Rad for the detection of all pre-defined findings are on a high level and comparable to the WR. The seemingly advantageous high sensitivity of the AI-Rad is partially offset by the disadvantage of a high false-detection-rate. At the current stage of development, therefore, the high NPVs may be the greatest benefit of the AI-Rad giving radiologists the possibility to re-insure their own negative search for pathologies and thus boosting their confidence in their reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99858192023-03-06 Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays Niehoff, Julius Henning Kalaitzidis, Jana Kroeger, Jan Robert Schoenbeck, Denise Borggrefe, Jan Michael, Arwed Elias Sci Rep Article The AI-Rad Companion Chest X-ray (AI-Rad, Siemens Healthineers) is an artificial-intelligence based application for the analysis of chest X-rays. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the performance of the AI-Rad. In total, 499 radiographs were retrospectively included. Radiographs were independently evaluated by radiologists and the AI-Rad. Findings indicated by the AI-Rad and findings described in the written report (WR) were compared to the findings of a ground truth reading (consensus decision of two radiologists after assessing additional radiographs and CT scans). The AI-Rad can offer superior sensitivity for the detection of lung lesions (0.83 versus 0.52), consolidations (0.88 versus 0.78) and atelectasis (0.54 versus 0.43) compared to the WR. However, the superior sensitivity is accompanied by higher false-detection-rates. The sensitivity of the AI-Rad for the detection of pleural effusions is lower compared to the WR (0.74 versus 0.88). The negative-predictive-values (NPV) of the AI-Rad for the detection of all pre-defined findings are on a high level and comparable to the WR. The seemingly advantageous high sensitivity of the AI-Rad is partially offset by the disadvantage of a high false-detection-rate. At the current stage of development, therefore, the high NPVs may be the greatest benefit of the AI-Rad giving radiologists the possibility to re-insure their own negative search for pathologies and thus boosting their confidence in their reports. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9985819/ /pubmed/36872333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30521-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Niehoff, Julius Henning
Kalaitzidis, Jana
Kroeger, Jan Robert
Schoenbeck, Denise
Borggrefe, Jan
Michael, Arwed Elias
Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title_full Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title_fullStr Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title_short Evaluation of the clinical performance of an AI-based application for the automated analysis of chest X-rays
title_sort evaluation of the clinical performance of an ai-based application for the automated analysis of chest x-rays
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30521-2
work_keys_str_mv AT niehoffjuliushenning evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays
AT kalaitzidisjana evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays
AT kroegerjanrobert evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays
AT schoenbeckdenise evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays
AT borggrefejan evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays
AT michaelarwedelias evaluationoftheclinicalperformanceofanaibasedapplicationfortheautomatedanalysisofchestxrays