Cargando…

Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Management of bleeding trauma patients is still a difficult challenge. Massive transfusion (MT) requires resources to ensure the safety and timely delivery of blood products. Early prediction of MT need may be useful to shorten the time process of blood product preparation. The primary a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carsetti, Andrea, Antolini, Riccardo, Casarotta, Erika, Damiani, Elisa, Gasparri, Francesco, Marini, Benedetto, Adrario, Erica, Donati, Abele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w
_version_ 1784901040939728896
author Carsetti, Andrea
Antolini, Riccardo
Casarotta, Erika
Damiani, Elisa
Gasparri, Francesco
Marini, Benedetto
Adrario, Erica
Donati, Abele
author_facet Carsetti, Andrea
Antolini, Riccardo
Casarotta, Erika
Damiani, Elisa
Gasparri, Francesco
Marini, Benedetto
Adrario, Erica
Donati, Abele
author_sort Carsetti, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of bleeding trauma patients is still a difficult challenge. Massive transfusion (MT) requires resources to ensure the safety and timely delivery of blood products. Early prediction of MT need may be useful to shorten the time process of blood product preparation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of shock index to predict the need for MT in adult patients with trauma. For the same population, we also assessed the accuracy of SI to predict mortality. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 2022. Studies were included if they reported MT or mortality with SI recorded at arrival in the field or the emergency department. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, for a total of 670,728 patients. For MT the overall sensibility was 0.68 [0.57; 0.76], the overall specificity was 0.84 [0.79; 0.88] and the AUC was 0.85 [0.81; 0.88]. Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR+; LR−) were 4.24 [3.18–5.65] and 0.39 [0.29–0.52], respectively. For mortality the overall sensibility was 0.358 [0.238; 0.498] the overall specificity 0.742 [0.656; 0.813] and the AUC 0.553 (confidence region for sensitivity given specificity: [0.4014; 0.6759]; confidence region for specificity given sensitivity: [0.4799; 0.6332]). LR+ and LR− were 1.39 [1.36–1.42] and 0.87 [0.85–0.89], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that SI may have a limited role as the sole tool to predict the need for MT in adult trauma patients. SI is not accurate to predict mortality but may have a role to identify patients with a low risk of mortality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99858492023-03-06 Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Carsetti, Andrea Antolini, Riccardo Casarotta, Erika Damiani, Elisa Gasparri, Francesco Marini, Benedetto Adrario, Erica Donati, Abele Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Management of bleeding trauma patients is still a difficult challenge. Massive transfusion (MT) requires resources to ensure the safety and timely delivery of blood products. Early prediction of MT need may be useful to shorten the time process of blood product preparation. The primary aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of shock index to predict the need for MT in adult patients with trauma. For the same population, we also assessed the accuracy of SI to predict mortality. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 2022. Studies were included if they reported MT or mortality with SI recorded at arrival in the field or the emergency department. The risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, for a total of 670,728 patients. For MT the overall sensibility was 0.68 [0.57; 0.76], the overall specificity was 0.84 [0.79; 0.88] and the AUC was 0.85 [0.81; 0.88]. Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR+; LR−) were 4.24 [3.18–5.65] and 0.39 [0.29–0.52], respectively. For mortality the overall sensibility was 0.358 [0.238; 0.498] the overall specificity 0.742 [0.656; 0.813] and the AUC 0.553 (confidence region for sensitivity given specificity: [0.4014; 0.6759]; confidence region for specificity given sensitivity: [0.4799; 0.6332]). LR+ and LR− were 1.39 [1.36–1.42] and 0.87 [0.85–0.89], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that SI may have a limited role as the sole tool to predict the need for MT in adult trauma patients. SI is not accurate to predict mortality but may have a role to identify patients with a low risk of mortality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w. BioMed Central 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9985849/ /pubmed/36872322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Carsetti, Andrea
Antolini, Riccardo
Casarotta, Erika
Damiani, Elisa
Gasparri, Francesco
Marini, Benedetto
Adrario, Erica
Donati, Abele
Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04386-w
work_keys_str_mv AT carsettiandrea shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT antoliniriccardo shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT casarottaerika shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT damianielisa shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gasparrifrancesco shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marinibenedetto shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT adrarioerica shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT donatiabele shockindexaspredictorofmassivetransfusionandmortalityinpatientswithtraumaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis