Augmented Reality Navigation Can Achieve Accurate Coronal Component Alignment During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background Computer-navigated knee arthroplasty has been shown to improve accuracy over conventional instruments. The next generation of computer assistance is being developed using augmented reality. The accuracy of augmented reality navigation has not been established. Methods From April 2021 to October 2021, a prospective, consecutive series of 20 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty utilising an augmented reality-assisted navigation system (ARAN). The coronal and sagittal alignment of the femoral and tibial bone cuts was measured using the ARAN and the final position of the components was measured on postoperative CT scans. The absolute difference between the measurements was recorded to determine the accuracy of the ARAN. Results Two cases were excluded due to segmentation errors, leaving 18 cases for analysis. The ARAN produced a mean absolute error of 1.4°, 2.0°, 1.1° and 1.6° for the femoral coronal, femoral sagittal, tibial coronal and tibial sagittal alignments, respectively. No outliers (absolute error of >3°) were identified in femoral coronal or tibial coronal alignment measurements. Three outliers were identified in tibial sagittal alignment, with all cases demonstrating less tibial slope (by 3.1°, 3.3° and 4°). Five outliers were identified in femoral sagittal alignment and in all cases, the component was more extended (3.1°, 3.2°, 3.2°, 3.4° and 3.9°). The mean operative time significantly decreased from the first nine augmented reality cases to the final nine cases by 11 minutes (p<0.05). There was no difference in the accuracy between the early and late ARAN cases. Conclusion Augmented reality navigation can achieve accurate alignment of total knee arthroplasty with a low rate of component malposition in the coronal plane. Acceptable and consistent accuracy can be achieved from the initial adoption of this technique, however, some sagittal outliers were identified and there is a clear learning curve with respect to operating time. The level of evidence was IV.