Cargando…

A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening

OBJECTIVE: To compare the screening efficacy of colonoscopy and pathologically confirmed single and combined Asia-Pacific colorectal screening (APCS), faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and stool deoxyribonucleic acid (sDNA) testing protocols. METHODS: From April 2021 to April 2022, 842 volunteers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ze, Yuan, Tu, Huiming, Zhang, Lin, Bai, Yu, Ren, Yilin, Chen, Xin, Xue, Yuzheng, Sun, Renjuan, Yang, Yuling, Yang, Jie, Zhou, Xuan, Liu, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883167
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S398997
_version_ 1784901071543468032
author Ze, Yuan
Tu, Huiming
Zhang, Lin
Bai, Yu
Ren, Yilin
Chen, Xin
Xue, Yuzheng
Sun, Renjuan
Yang, Yuling
Yang, Jie
Zhou, Xuan
Liu, Li
author_facet Ze, Yuan
Tu, Huiming
Zhang, Lin
Bai, Yu
Ren, Yilin
Chen, Xin
Xue, Yuzheng
Sun, Renjuan
Yang, Yuling
Yang, Jie
Zhou, Xuan
Liu, Li
author_sort Ze, Yuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the screening efficacy of colonoscopy and pathologically confirmed single and combined Asia-Pacific colorectal screening (APCS), faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and stool deoxyribonucleic acid (sDNA) testing protocols. METHODS: From April 2021 to April 2022, 842 volunteers participated in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings using APCS scoring, FIT and sDNA testing and 115 underwent a colonoscopy. One hundred high-risk participants were then identified from the results of both processes. The differences in the three CRC screening tests in combination with the colonoscopy pathology diagnostics were evaluated using Cochran’s Q test, the Dunn–Bonferroni test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value analysis. RESULTS: Both FIT and sDNA testing demonstrated a 100% performance in detecting CRC. For advanced adenoma, the sensitivity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme (double positive) was 29.2%, and the sensitivities of the combined FIT + sDNA test and APCS scoring + sDNA test schemes were 62.5% and 95.8%, respectively. The FIT + sDNA testing kappa value of advanced colorectal neoplasia was 0.344 (p = 0.011). The sensitivity for nonadvanced adenoma of the APCS score + sDNA test scheme was 91.1%. In terms of positive results, the sensitivity of the APCS score + FIT + sDNA detection protocol was significantly higher than that of the APCS score, FIT, sDNA detection, and FIT + sDNA detection methods (adjusted p < 0.001, respectively). For the FIT + sDNA test, the kappa value was 0.220 (p = 0.015) and the AUC was 0.634 (p = 0.037). The specificity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme was 69.0%. CONCLUSION: The FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy, and the combined APCS score + FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated remarkable improvements in CRC screening efficiency and sensitivity for detecting positive lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9985980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99859802023-03-06 A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening Ze, Yuan Tu, Huiming Zhang, Lin Bai, Yu Ren, Yilin Chen, Xin Xue, Yuzheng Sun, Renjuan Yang, Yuling Yang, Jie Zhou, Xuan Liu, Li J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the screening efficacy of colonoscopy and pathologically confirmed single and combined Asia-Pacific colorectal screening (APCS), faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and stool deoxyribonucleic acid (sDNA) testing protocols. METHODS: From April 2021 to April 2022, 842 volunteers participated in primary colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings using APCS scoring, FIT and sDNA testing and 115 underwent a colonoscopy. One hundred high-risk participants were then identified from the results of both processes. The differences in the three CRC screening tests in combination with the colonoscopy pathology diagnostics were evaluated using Cochran’s Q test, the Dunn–Bonferroni test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value analysis. RESULTS: Both FIT and sDNA testing demonstrated a 100% performance in detecting CRC. For advanced adenoma, the sensitivity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme (double positive) was 29.2%, and the sensitivities of the combined FIT + sDNA test and APCS scoring + sDNA test schemes were 62.5% and 95.8%, respectively. The FIT + sDNA testing kappa value of advanced colorectal neoplasia was 0.344 (p = 0.011). The sensitivity for nonadvanced adenoma of the APCS score + sDNA test scheme was 91.1%. In terms of positive results, the sensitivity of the APCS score + FIT + sDNA detection protocol was significantly higher than that of the APCS score, FIT, sDNA detection, and FIT + sDNA detection methods (adjusted p < 0.001, respectively). For the FIT + sDNA test, the kappa value was 0.220 (p = 0.015) and the AUC was 0.634 (p = 0.037). The specificity of the FIT + sDNA test scheme was 69.0%. CONCLUSION: The FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy, and the combined APCS score + FIT + sDNA test scheme demonstrated remarkable improvements in CRC screening efficiency and sensitivity for detecting positive lesions. Dove 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9985980/ /pubmed/36883167 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S398997 Text en © 2023 Ze et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ze, Yuan
Tu, Huiming
Zhang, Lin
Bai, Yu
Ren, Yilin
Chen, Xin
Xue, Yuzheng
Sun, Renjuan
Yang, Yuling
Yang, Jie
Zhou, Xuan
Liu, Li
A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_fullStr A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_short A Comparison of Single and Combined Schemes of Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening, Faecal Immunochemical and Stool Deoxyribonucleic Acid Testing for Community Colorectal Cancer Screening
title_sort comparison of single and combined schemes of asia-pacific colorectal screening, faecal immunochemical and stool deoxyribonucleic acid testing for community colorectal cancer screening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883167
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S398997
work_keys_str_mv AT zeyuan acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT tuhuiming acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT zhanglin acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT baiyu acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT renyilin acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT chenxin acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT xueyuzheng acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT sunrenjuan acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT yangyuling acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT yangjie acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT zhouxuan acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT liuli acomparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT zeyuan comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT tuhuiming comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT zhanglin comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT baiyu comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT renyilin comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT chenxin comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT xueyuzheng comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT sunrenjuan comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT yangyuling comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT yangjie comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT zhouxuan comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening
AT liuli comparisonofsingleandcombinedschemesofasiapacificcolorectalscreeningfaecalimmunochemicalandstooldeoxyribonucleicacidtestingforcommunitycolorectalcancerscreening