Cargando…

Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review

The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Jenny, Teske, Noelle M., Zigler, Christina K., Hamilton, Andrew, Jacobe, Heidi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100172
_version_ 1784901078677979136
author Foster, Jenny
Teske, Noelle M.
Zigler, Christina K.
Hamilton, Andrew
Jacobe, Heidi
author_facet Foster, Jenny
Teske, Noelle M.
Zigler, Christina K.
Hamilton, Andrew
Jacobe, Heidi
author_sort Foster, Jenny
collection PubMed
description The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A coding document was developed to collect information on authors, methodology, participants, research theme, and the presence of quality criteria as outlined by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Manuscripts were included if they described original qualitative research about dermatologic conditions or topics of primary interest to dermatology. An adjacency search yielded 372 manuscripts, and after screening, 134 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies utilized interviews or focus groups, and researchers predominantly selected participants on the basis of disease status, including over 30 common and rare dermatologic conditions. Research themes frequently included patient experience of disease, development of patient-reported outcomes, and descriptions of provider and caregiver experiences. Although most authors explained their analysis and sampling strategy and included empirical data, few referenced qualitative data reporting standards. Missed opportunities for qualitative methods in dermatology include examination of health disparities, exploration of surgical and cosmetic dermatology experiences, and determination of the lived experience of and provider attitudes toward diverse patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9986021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99860212023-03-07 Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review Foster, Jenny Teske, Noelle M. Zigler, Christina K. Hamilton, Andrew Jacobe, Heidi JID Innov Review The focus of this review was to determine how qualitative methods are used in dermatology research and whether published manuscripts meet current standards for qualitative research. A scoping review of manuscripts published in English between January 1, 2016 and September 22, 2021 was conducted. A coding document was developed to collect information on authors, methodology, participants, research theme, and the presence of quality criteria as outlined by the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Manuscripts were included if they described original qualitative research about dermatologic conditions or topics of primary interest to dermatology. An adjacency search yielded 372 manuscripts, and after screening, 134 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies utilized interviews or focus groups, and researchers predominantly selected participants on the basis of disease status, including over 30 common and rare dermatologic conditions. Research themes frequently included patient experience of disease, development of patient-reported outcomes, and descriptions of provider and caregiver experiences. Although most authors explained their analysis and sampling strategy and included empirical data, few referenced qualitative data reporting standards. Missed opportunities for qualitative methods in dermatology include examination of health disparities, exploration of surgical and cosmetic dermatology experiences, and determination of the lived experience of and provider attitudes toward diverse patient populations. Elsevier 2022-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9986021/ /pubmed/36891031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100172 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Foster, Jenny
Teske, Noelle M.
Zigler, Christina K.
Hamilton, Andrew
Jacobe, Heidi
Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title_full Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title_short Current Utilization of Qualitative Methodologies in Dermatology: A Scoping Review
title_sort current utilization of qualitative methodologies in dermatology: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjidi.2022.100172
work_keys_str_mv AT fosterjenny currentutilizationofqualitativemethodologiesindermatologyascopingreview
AT teskenoellem currentutilizationofqualitativemethodologiesindermatologyascopingreview
AT ziglerchristinak currentutilizationofqualitativemethodologiesindermatologyascopingreview
AT hamiltonandrew currentutilizationofqualitativemethodologiesindermatologyascopingreview
AT jacobeheidi currentutilizationofqualitativemethodologiesindermatologyascopingreview