Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML

Age and comorbidities are important factors to be considered in the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first‐line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP). However, it is yet unclear whether TKI selection, particularly, imatinib versus second‐gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ono, Takaaki, Takahashi, Naoto, Kizaki, Masahiro, Kawaguchi, Tatsuya, Suzuki, Ritsuro, Yamamoto, Kazuhito, Ohnishi, Kazunori, Naoe, Tomoki, Matsumura, Itaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15642
_version_ 1784901091761061888
author Ono, Takaaki
Takahashi, Naoto
Kizaki, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Tatsuya
Suzuki, Ritsuro
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Ohnishi, Kazunori
Naoe, Tomoki
Matsumura, Itaru
author_facet Ono, Takaaki
Takahashi, Naoto
Kizaki, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Tatsuya
Suzuki, Ritsuro
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Ohnishi, Kazunori
Naoe, Tomoki
Matsumura, Itaru
author_sort Ono, Takaaki
collection PubMed
description Age and comorbidities are important factors to be considered in the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first‐line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP). However, it is yet unclear whether TKI selection, particularly, imatinib versus second‐generation TKIs (2GTKIs), impacts treatment outcomes in the clinical practice. To address this, we compared the clinical outcomes of prospectively registered 452 patients with CML‐CP treated with imatinib and 2GTKIs, taking into consideration their age and/or comorbidities. A total of 136 patients (30.1%) were classified into an older cohort (≥65 years) and 316 (69.9%) into a younger cohort (18‐64 years). The TKI selection did not vary based on age (70.6% received 2GTKIs in the younger cohort and 66.2% in the older cohort). The median follow‐up period was 5.4 years. Treatment responses including the cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (BCR‐ABL1 international scale ≤0.0032%) at any time were similar between the two age cohorts regardless of the type of TKI. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) in the older cohort was lower than that in the younger cohort (95.9% vs 83.8%; p < 0.0001), whereas the 5‐year OS in patients treated with 2GTKIs was not influenced by age factors and comorbidities. Therefore, our results suggest that the selection of 2GTKIs as first‐line treatment is an effective option for both younger and older CML‐CP patients with or without comorbidities. This trial was registered at UMIN‐CTR as 00003581.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9986084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99860842023-03-07 Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML Ono, Takaaki Takahashi, Naoto Kizaki, Masahiro Kawaguchi, Tatsuya Suzuki, Ritsuro Yamamoto, Kazuhito Ohnishi, Kazunori Naoe, Tomoki Matsumura, Itaru Cancer Sci ORIGINAL ARTICLES Age and comorbidities are important factors to be considered in the selection of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first‐line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP). However, it is yet unclear whether TKI selection, particularly, imatinib versus second‐generation TKIs (2GTKIs), impacts treatment outcomes in the clinical practice. To address this, we compared the clinical outcomes of prospectively registered 452 patients with CML‐CP treated with imatinib and 2GTKIs, taking into consideration their age and/or comorbidities. A total of 136 patients (30.1%) were classified into an older cohort (≥65 years) and 316 (69.9%) into a younger cohort (18‐64 years). The TKI selection did not vary based on age (70.6% received 2GTKIs in the younger cohort and 66.2% in the older cohort). The median follow‐up period was 5.4 years. Treatment responses including the cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (BCR‐ABL1 international scale ≤0.0032%) at any time were similar between the two age cohorts regardless of the type of TKI. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) in the older cohort was lower than that in the younger cohort (95.9% vs 83.8%; p < 0.0001), whereas the 5‐year OS in patients treated with 2GTKIs was not influenced by age factors and comorbidities. Therefore, our results suggest that the selection of 2GTKIs as first‐line treatment is an effective option for both younger and older CML‐CP patients with or without comorbidities. This trial was registered at UMIN‐CTR as 00003581. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9986084/ /pubmed/36336963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15642 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Ono, Takaaki
Takahashi, Naoto
Kizaki, Masahiro
Kawaguchi, Tatsuya
Suzuki, Ritsuro
Yamamoto, Kazuhito
Ohnishi, Kazunori
Naoe, Tomoki
Matsumura, Itaru
Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title_full Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title_short Clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with CML
title_sort clinical outcomes of second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus imatinib in older patients with cml
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.15642
work_keys_str_mv AT onotakaaki clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT takahashinaoto clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT kizakimasahiro clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT kawaguchitatsuya clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT suzukiritsuro clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT yamamotokazuhito clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT ohnishikazunori clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT naoetomoki clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml
AT matsumuraitaru clinicaloutcomesofsecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsversusimatinibinolderpatientswithcml