Cargando…
Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Colchicine, thought to exert its effect via reduction of inflammation, has recently been studied in patients following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this high-risk cohort, evaluating efficacy and saf...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-022-00298-y |
_version_ | 1784901109687517184 |
---|---|
author | Nogic, Jason Mehta, Ojas Tong, David Brown, Adam J. Layland, Jamie |
author_facet | Nogic, Jason Mehta, Ojas Tong, David Brown, Adam J. Layland, Jamie |
author_sort | Nogic, Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Colchicine, thought to exert its effect via reduction of inflammation, has recently been studied in patients following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this high-risk cohort, evaluating efficacy and safety. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, clinical trial registries, and select conference proceedings were searched for RCTs comparing colchicine to placebo in patients following ACS. The primary outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause and cardiovascular death, and urgent revascularization. Analysis was performed at the longest available clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Two RCTs with a pooled sample size of 5540 patients with 2778 (50.1%) receiving colchicine and 2762 (49.9%) placebo were included. In order to maximize consistency, composite efficacy endpoints between trials were modified. Compared to placebo, patients receiving colchicine had reduction in study-defined composite endpoint (5.5% vs. 7.6%) OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.46–0.98, p = 0.04, I(2) = 46%). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14–0.69, p = 0.004, I(2) = 0%) and repeat revascularization OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.90, p = 0.03, I(2) = 54%). There was no difference between cardiovascular death (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52–1.62, p = 0.78, I(2) = 0%), non-cardiovascular death OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.72–2.24, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%), MI at longest available follow-up OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.67–1.17, p = 0.39, I(2) = 0%) or resuscitated cardiac arrest OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.32–2.43, p = 0.81, I(2) = 0%) in those receiving colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest colchicine, in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy following acute coronary syndrome reduces MACE, cerebrovascular accidents, and rates of urgent revascularization at 2 years of follow-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40119-022-00298-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9986187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99861872023-03-07 Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis Nogic, Jason Mehta, Ojas Tong, David Brown, Adam J. Layland, Jamie Cardiol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Colchicine, thought to exert its effect via reduction of inflammation, has recently been studied in patients following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We performed a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this high-risk cohort, evaluating efficacy and safety. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, clinical trial registries, and select conference proceedings were searched for RCTs comparing colchicine to placebo in patients following ACS. The primary outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary endpoints included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause and cardiovascular death, and urgent revascularization. Analysis was performed at the longest available clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Two RCTs with a pooled sample size of 5540 patients with 2778 (50.1%) receiving colchicine and 2762 (49.9%) placebo were included. In order to maximize consistency, composite efficacy endpoints between trials were modified. Compared to placebo, patients receiving colchicine had reduction in study-defined composite endpoint (5.5% vs. 7.6%) OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.46–0.98, p = 0.04, I(2) = 46%). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14–0.69, p = 0.004, I(2) = 0%) and repeat revascularization OR 0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.90, p = 0.03, I(2) = 54%). There was no difference between cardiovascular death (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52–1.62, p = 0.78, I(2) = 0%), non-cardiovascular death OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.72–2.24, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%), MI at longest available follow-up OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.67–1.17, p = 0.39, I(2) = 0%) or resuscitated cardiac arrest OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.32–2.43, p = 0.81, I(2) = 0%) in those receiving colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest colchicine, in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy following acute coronary syndrome reduces MACE, cerebrovascular accidents, and rates of urgent revascularization at 2 years of follow-up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40119-022-00298-y. Springer Healthcare 2023-01-06 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9986187/ /pubmed/36609745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-022-00298-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nogic, Jason Mehta, Ojas Tong, David Brown, Adam J. Layland, Jamie Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title | Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title_full | Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title_short | Colchicine in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-analysis |
title_sort | colchicine in the management of acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36609745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-022-00298-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nogicjason colchicineinthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysis AT mehtaojas colchicineinthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysis AT tongdavid colchicineinthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysis AT brownadamj colchicineinthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysis AT laylandjamie colchicineinthemanagementofacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysis |