Cargando…

A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES: Biomarker testing is indispensable for the implementation of precision medicine (PM) in oncology. The aim of this study was to assess the value of biomarker testing from a holistic perspective based on the example of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmarcher, Thomas, Malmberg, Chiara, Lindgren, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1119506
_version_ 1784901128168669184
author Hofmarcher, Thomas
Malmberg, Chiara
Lindgren, Peter
author_facet Hofmarcher, Thomas
Malmberg, Chiara
Lindgren, Peter
author_sort Hofmarcher, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Biomarker testing is indispensable for the implementation of precision medicine (PM) in oncology. The aim of this study was to assess the value of biomarker testing from a holistic perspective based on the example of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partitioned survival model was populated with data from pivotal clinical trials of first-line treatments in aNSCLC. Three testing scenarios were considered; “no biomarker testing” encompassing chemotherapy treatment, “sequential testing” for EGFR and ALK encompassing treatment with targeted- or chemotherapy, and “multigene testing” covering EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, MET, RET and encompassing treatment with targeted- or immuno(chemo)therapy. Analyses of health outcomes and costs were run for nine countries (Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Turkey, United States). A 1-year and 5-year time horizon was applied. Information on test accuracy was combined with country-specific information on epidemiology and unit costs. RESULTS: Compared to the no-testing scenario, survival improved and treatment-related adverse events decreased with increased testing. Five-year survival increased from 2% to 5–7% and to 13–19% with sequential testing and multigene testing, respectively. The highest survival gains were observed in East Asia due to a higher local prevalence of targetable mutations. Overall costs increased with increased testing in all countries. Although costs for testing and medicines increased, costs for treatment of adverse events and end-of-life care decreased throughout all years. Non-health care costs (sick leave and disability pension payments) decreased during the first year but increased over a 5-year horizon. CONCLUSION: The broad use of biomarker testing and PM in aNSCLC leads to more efficient treatment assignment and improves health outcomes for patients globally, in particular prolonged progression-free disease phase and overall survival. These health gains require investment in biomarker testing and medicines. While costs for testing and medicines would initially increase, cost decreases for other medical services and non-health care costs may partly offset the cost increases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9986274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99862742023-03-07 A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer Hofmarcher, Thomas Malmberg, Chiara Lindgren, Peter Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVES: Biomarker testing is indispensable for the implementation of precision medicine (PM) in oncology. The aim of this study was to assess the value of biomarker testing from a holistic perspective based on the example of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A partitioned survival model was populated with data from pivotal clinical trials of first-line treatments in aNSCLC. Three testing scenarios were considered; “no biomarker testing” encompassing chemotherapy treatment, “sequential testing” for EGFR and ALK encompassing treatment with targeted- or chemotherapy, and “multigene testing” covering EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, MET, RET and encompassing treatment with targeted- or immuno(chemo)therapy. Analyses of health outcomes and costs were run for nine countries (Australia, Brazil, China, Germany, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Turkey, United States). A 1-year and 5-year time horizon was applied. Information on test accuracy was combined with country-specific information on epidemiology and unit costs. RESULTS: Compared to the no-testing scenario, survival improved and treatment-related adverse events decreased with increased testing. Five-year survival increased from 2% to 5–7% and to 13–19% with sequential testing and multigene testing, respectively. The highest survival gains were observed in East Asia due to a higher local prevalence of targetable mutations. Overall costs increased with increased testing in all countries. Although costs for testing and medicines increased, costs for treatment of adverse events and end-of-life care decreased throughout all years. Non-health care costs (sick leave and disability pension payments) decreased during the first year but increased over a 5-year horizon. CONCLUSION: The broad use of biomarker testing and PM in aNSCLC leads to more efficient treatment assignment and improves health outcomes for patients globally, in particular prolonged progression-free disease phase and overall survival. These health gains require investment in biomarker testing and medicines. While costs for testing and medicines would initially increase, cost decreases for other medical services and non-health care costs may partly offset the cost increases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9986274/ /pubmed/36891190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1119506 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hofmarcher, Malmberg and Lindgren. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Hofmarcher, Thomas
Malmberg, Chiara
Lindgren, Peter
A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title_full A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title_short A global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – The case of non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort global analysis of the value of precision medicine in oncology – the case of non-small cell lung cancer
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1119506
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmarcherthomas aglobalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT malmbergchiara aglobalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT lindgrenpeter aglobalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hofmarcherthomas globalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT malmbergchiara globalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT lindgrenpeter globalanalysisofthevalueofprecisionmedicineinoncologythecaseofnonsmallcelllungcancer