Cargando…
Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 |
_version_ | 1784901199985639424 |
---|---|
author | Beaudry, Catherine Prozesky, Heidi St-Pierre, Carl Mirnezami, Seyed Reza |
author_facet | Beaudry, Catherine Prozesky, Heidi St-Pierre, Carl Mirnezami, Seyed Reza |
author_sort | Beaudry, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”. To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9986590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99865902023-03-07 Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective Beaudry, Catherine Prozesky, Heidi St-Pierre, Carl Mirnezami, Seyed Reza Front Res Metr Anal Research Metrics and Analytics A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”. To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9986590/ /pubmed/36890922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 Text en Copyright © 2023 Beaudry, Prozesky, St-Pierre and Mirnezami. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Metrics and Analytics Beaudry, Catherine Prozesky, Heidi St-Pierre, Carl Mirnezami, Seyed Reza Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title | Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title_full | Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title_fullStr | Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title_short | Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective |
title_sort | factors that affect scientific publication in africa—a gender perspective |
topic | Research Metrics and Analytics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaudrycatherine factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective AT prozeskyheidi factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective AT stpierrecarl factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective AT mirnezamiseyedreza factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective |