Cargando…

Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective

A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beaudry, Catherine, Prozesky, Heidi, St-Pierre, Carl, Mirnezami, Seyed Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823
_version_ 1784901199985639424
author Beaudry, Catherine
Prozesky, Heidi
St-Pierre, Carl
Mirnezami, Seyed Reza
author_facet Beaudry, Catherine
Prozesky, Heidi
St-Pierre, Carl
Mirnezami, Seyed Reza
author_sort Beaudry, Catherine
collection PubMed
description A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”. To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9986590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99865902023-03-07 Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective Beaudry, Catherine Prozesky, Heidi St-Pierre, Carl Mirnezami, Seyed Reza Front Res Metr Anal Research Metrics and Analytics A large body of literature on gender differences in scientific publication output has clearly established that women scientists publish less that men do. Yet, no single explanation or group of explanations satisfactorily accounts for this difference, which has been called the “productivity puzzle”. To provide a more refined portrait of the scientific publication output of women in relation to that of their male peers, we conducted a web-based survey in 2016 of individual researchers across all African countries, except Libya. The resulting 6,875 valid questionnaires submitted by respondents in the STEM, Health Science and SSH fields were analyzed using multivariate regressions on the self-reported number of articles published in the preceding 3 years. Controlling for a variety of variables including career stage, workload, mobility, research field, and collaboration, we measured the direct and moderating effect of gender on scientific production of African researchers. Our results show that, while women's scientific publication output is positively affected by collaboration and age (impediments to women's scientific output decrease later in their careers), it is negatively impacted by care-work and household chores, limited mobility, and teaching hours. Women are as prolific when they devote the same hours to other academic tasks and raise the same amount of research funding as their male colleagues. Our results lead us to argue that the standard academic career model, relying on continuous publications and regular promotions, assumes a masculine life cycle that reinforces the general perception that women with discontinuous careers are less productive than their male colleagues, and systematically disadvantages women. We conclude that the solution resides beyond women's empowerment, i.e., in the broader institutions of education and the family, which have an important role to play in fostering men's equal contribution to household chores and care-work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9986590/ /pubmed/36890922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823 Text en Copyright © 2023 Beaudry, Prozesky, St-Pierre and Mirnezami. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Research Metrics and Analytics
Beaudry, Catherine
Prozesky, Heidi
St-Pierre, Carl
Mirnezami, Seyed Reza
Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title_full Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title_fullStr Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title_full_unstemmed Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title_short Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective
title_sort factors that affect scientific publication in africa—a gender perspective
topic Research Metrics and Analytics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9986590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1040823
work_keys_str_mv AT beaudrycatherine factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective
AT prozeskyheidi factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective
AT stpierrecarl factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective
AT mirnezamiseyedreza factorsthataffectscientificpublicationinafricaagenderperspective