Cargando…

Influence network model uncovers relations between biological processes and mutational signatures

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing appreciation recently that mutagenic processes can be studied through the lenses of mutational signatures, which represent characteristic mutation patterns attributed to individual mutagens. However, the causal links between mutagens and observed mutation pattern...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amgalan, Bayarbaatar, Wojtowicz, Damian, Kim, Yoo-Ah, Przytycka, Teresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-023-01162-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There has been a growing appreciation recently that mutagenic processes can be studied through the lenses of mutational signatures, which represent characteristic mutation patterns attributed to individual mutagens. However, the causal links between mutagens and observed mutation patterns as well as other types of interactions between mutagenic processes and molecular pathways are not fully understood, limiting the utility of mutational signatures. METHODS: To gain insights into these relationships, we developed a network-based method, named GeneSigNet that constructs an influence network among genes and mutational signatures. The approach leverages sparse partial correlation among other statistical techniques to uncover dominant influence relations between the activities of network nodes. RESULTS: Applying GeneSigNet to cancer data sets, we uncovered important relations between mutational signatures and several cellular processes that can shed light on cancer-related processes. Our results are consistent with previous findings, such as the impact of homologous recombination deficiency on clustered APOBEC mutations in breast cancer. The network identified by GeneSigNet also suggest an interaction between APOBEC hypermutation and activation of regulatory T Cells (Tregs), as well as a relation between APOBEC mutations and changes in DNA conformation. GeneSigNet also exposed a possible link between the SBS8 signature of unknown etiology and the Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway. CONCLUSIONS: GeneSigNet provides a new and powerful method to reveal the relation between mutational signatures and gene expression. The GeneSigNet method was implemented in python, and installable package, source codes and the data sets used for and generated during this study are available at the Github site https://github.com/ncbi/GeneSigNet. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-023-01162-x.