Cargando…
Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors
BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the most commonly used class of medications worldwide for the last three decades. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of methoxyphenyl thiazole carboxamide derivatives and evaluate their cyclooxygena...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-023-00924-3 |
_version_ | 1784901318049005568 |
---|---|
author | Hawash, Mohammed Jaradat, Nidal Abualhasan, Murad Şüküroğlu, Murat Kadır Qaoud, Mohammed T. Kahraman, Deniz Cansen Daraghmeh, Heba Maslamani, Leen Sawafta, Mais Ratrout, Ala Issa, Linda |
author_facet | Hawash, Mohammed Jaradat, Nidal Abualhasan, Murad Şüküroğlu, Murat Kadır Qaoud, Mohammed T. Kahraman, Deniz Cansen Daraghmeh, Heba Maslamani, Leen Sawafta, Mais Ratrout, Ala Issa, Linda |
author_sort | Hawash, Mohammed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the most commonly used class of medications worldwide for the last three decades. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of methoxyphenyl thiazole carboxamide derivatives and evaluate their cyclooxygenase (COX) suppressant and cytotoxic properties. METHODS: The synthesized compounds were characterized using (1)H, (13)C-NMR, IR, and HRMS spectrum analysis and were evaluated for their selectivity towards COX-1 and COX-2 using an in vitro COX inhibition assay kit. Besides, their cytotoxicity was evaluated using the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Moreover, molecular docking studies were conducted to identify the possible binding patterns of these compounds within both COX-1 and COX-2 isozymes, utilizing human X-ray crystal structures. The density functional theory (DFT) analysis was used to evaluate compound chemical reactivity, which was determined by calculating the frontier orbital energy of both HOMO and LUMO orbitals, as well as the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. Finally, the QiKProp module was used for ADME-T analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed that all synthesized molecules have potent inhibitory activities against COX enzymes. The percentage of inhibitory activities at 5 µM concentration against the COX2 enzyme was in the range of 53.9–81.5%, while the percentage against the COX-1 enzyme was 14.7–74.8%. That means almost all of our compounds have selective inhibition activities against the COX-2 enzyme, and the most selective compound was 2f, with selectivity ratio (SR) value of 3.67 at 5 µM concentration, which has a bulky group of trimethoxy on the phenyl ring that could not bind well with the COX-1 enzyme. Compound 2h was the most potent, with an inhibitory activity percentage at 5 µM concentration of 81.5 and 58.2% against COX-2 and COX-1, respectively. The cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated against three cancer cell lines: Huh7, MCF-7, and HCT116, and negligible or very weak activities were observed for all of these compounds except compound 2f, which showed moderate activities with IC(50) values of 17.47 and 14.57 µM against Huh7 and HCT116 cancer cell lines, respectively. Analysis of the molecular docking suggests 2d, 2e, 2f, and 2i molecules were bound to COX-2 isozyme favorably over COX-1 enzyme, and their interaction behaviors within COX-1 and COX-2 isozymes were comparable to celecoxib, as an ideal selective COX-2 drug, which explained their high potency and COX-2 selectivity. The molecular docking scores and expected affinity using the MM-GBSA approach were consistent with the recorded biological activity. The calculated global reactivity descriptors, such as HOMO and LUMO energies and the HOMO–LUMO gaps, confirmed the key structural features required to achieve favorable binding interactions and thus improve affinity. The in silico ADME-T studies asserted the druggability of molecules and have the potential to become lead molecules in the drug discovery process. CONCLUSION: In general, the series of the synthesized compounds had a strong effect on both enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) and the trimethoxy compound 2f was more selective than the other compounds. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-023-00924-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9987136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99871362023-03-07 Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors Hawash, Mohammed Jaradat, Nidal Abualhasan, Murad Şüküroğlu, Murat Kadır Qaoud, Mohammed T. Kahraman, Deniz Cansen Daraghmeh, Heba Maslamani, Leen Sawafta, Mais Ratrout, Ala Issa, Linda BMC Chem Research BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the most commonly used class of medications worldwide for the last three decades. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of methoxyphenyl thiazole carboxamide derivatives and evaluate their cyclooxygenase (COX) suppressant and cytotoxic properties. METHODS: The synthesized compounds were characterized using (1)H, (13)C-NMR, IR, and HRMS spectrum analysis and were evaluated for their selectivity towards COX-1 and COX-2 using an in vitro COX inhibition assay kit. Besides, their cytotoxicity was evaluated using the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Moreover, molecular docking studies were conducted to identify the possible binding patterns of these compounds within both COX-1 and COX-2 isozymes, utilizing human X-ray crystal structures. The density functional theory (DFT) analysis was used to evaluate compound chemical reactivity, which was determined by calculating the frontier orbital energy of both HOMO and LUMO orbitals, as well as the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. Finally, the QiKProp module was used for ADME-T analysis. RESULTS: The results revealed that all synthesized molecules have potent inhibitory activities against COX enzymes. The percentage of inhibitory activities at 5 µM concentration against the COX2 enzyme was in the range of 53.9–81.5%, while the percentage against the COX-1 enzyme was 14.7–74.8%. That means almost all of our compounds have selective inhibition activities against the COX-2 enzyme, and the most selective compound was 2f, with selectivity ratio (SR) value of 3.67 at 5 µM concentration, which has a bulky group of trimethoxy on the phenyl ring that could not bind well with the COX-1 enzyme. Compound 2h was the most potent, with an inhibitory activity percentage at 5 µM concentration of 81.5 and 58.2% against COX-2 and COX-1, respectively. The cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated against three cancer cell lines: Huh7, MCF-7, and HCT116, and negligible or very weak activities were observed for all of these compounds except compound 2f, which showed moderate activities with IC(50) values of 17.47 and 14.57 µM against Huh7 and HCT116 cancer cell lines, respectively. Analysis of the molecular docking suggests 2d, 2e, 2f, and 2i molecules were bound to COX-2 isozyme favorably over COX-1 enzyme, and their interaction behaviors within COX-1 and COX-2 isozymes were comparable to celecoxib, as an ideal selective COX-2 drug, which explained their high potency and COX-2 selectivity. The molecular docking scores and expected affinity using the MM-GBSA approach were consistent with the recorded biological activity. The calculated global reactivity descriptors, such as HOMO and LUMO energies and the HOMO–LUMO gaps, confirmed the key structural features required to achieve favorable binding interactions and thus improve affinity. The in silico ADME-T studies asserted the druggability of molecules and have the potential to become lead molecules in the drug discovery process. CONCLUSION: In general, the series of the synthesized compounds had a strong effect on both enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) and the trimethoxy compound 2f was more selective than the other compounds. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-023-00924-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9987136/ /pubmed/36879343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-023-00924-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hawash, Mohammed Jaradat, Nidal Abualhasan, Murad Şüküroğlu, Murat Kadır Qaoud, Mohammed T. Kahraman, Deniz Cansen Daraghmeh, Heba Maslamani, Leen Sawafta, Mais Ratrout, Ala Issa, Linda Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title | Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title_full | Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title_fullStr | Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title_short | Design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as COX inhibitors |
title_sort | design, synthesis, molecular docking studies and biological evaluation of thiazole carboxamide derivatives as cox inhibitors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13065-023-00924-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hawashmohammed designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT jaradatnidal designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT abualhasanmurad designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT sukuroglumuratkadır designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT qaoudmohammedt designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT kahramandenizcansen designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT daraghmehheba designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT maslamanileen designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT sawaftamais designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT ratroutala designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors AT issalinda designsynthesismoleculardockingstudiesandbiologicalevaluationofthiazolecarboxamidederivativesascoxinhibitors |