Cargando…

Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Largely absent from research on how users appraise the credibility of professionals as sources for the information they find on social media is work investigating factors shaping credibility within a specific profession, such as physicians. OBJECTIVE: We address debates about how physici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrell, DaJuan, Campos-Castillo, Celeste
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113807
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34525
_version_ 1784901328008380416
author Ferrell, DaJuan
Campos-Castillo, Celeste
author_facet Ferrell, DaJuan
Campos-Castillo, Celeste
author_sort Ferrell, DaJuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Largely absent from research on how users appraise the credibility of professionals as sources for the information they find on social media is work investigating factors shaping credibility within a specific profession, such as physicians. OBJECTIVE: We address debates about how physicians can show their credibility on social media depending on whether they employ a formal or casual appearance in their profile picture. Using prominence-interpretation theory, we posit that formal appearance will affect perceived credibility based on users' social context—specifically, whether they have a regular health care provider. METHODS: For this experiment, we recruited 205 social media users using Amazon Mechanical Turk. We asked participants if they had a regular health care provider and then randomly assigned them to read 1 of 3 Twitter posts that varied only in the profile picture of the physician offering health advice. Next, we tasked participants with assessing the credibility of the physician and their likelihood of engaging with the tweet and the physician on Twitter. We used path analysis to assess whether participants having a regular health care provider impacted how the profile picture affected their ratings of the physician’s credibility and their likelihood to engage with the tweet and physician on Twitter. RESULTS: We found that the profile picture of a physician posting health advice in either formal or casual attire did not elicit significant differences in credibility, with ratings comparable to those having no profile image. Among participants assigned the formal appearance condition, those with a regular provider rated the physician higher on a credibility than those without, which led to stronger intentions to engage with the tweet and physician. CONCLUSIONS: The findings add to existing research by showing how the social context of information seeking on social media shapes the credibility of a given professional. Practical implications for professionals engaging with the public on social media and combating false information include moving past debates about casual versus formal appearances and toward identifying ways to segment audiences based on factors like their backgrounds (eg, experiences with health care providers).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9987183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99871832023-04-26 Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study Ferrell, DaJuan Campos-Castillo, Celeste JMIR Infodemiology Original Paper BACKGROUND: Largely absent from research on how users appraise the credibility of professionals as sources for the information they find on social media is work investigating factors shaping credibility within a specific profession, such as physicians. OBJECTIVE: We address debates about how physicians can show their credibility on social media depending on whether they employ a formal or casual appearance in their profile picture. Using prominence-interpretation theory, we posit that formal appearance will affect perceived credibility based on users' social context—specifically, whether they have a regular health care provider. METHODS: For this experiment, we recruited 205 social media users using Amazon Mechanical Turk. We asked participants if they had a regular health care provider and then randomly assigned them to read 1 of 3 Twitter posts that varied only in the profile picture of the physician offering health advice. Next, we tasked participants with assessing the credibility of the physician and their likelihood of engaging with the tweet and the physician on Twitter. We used path analysis to assess whether participants having a regular health care provider impacted how the profile picture affected their ratings of the physician’s credibility and their likelihood to engage with the tweet and physician on Twitter. RESULTS: We found that the profile picture of a physician posting health advice in either formal or casual attire did not elicit significant differences in credibility, with ratings comparable to those having no profile image. Among participants assigned the formal appearance condition, those with a regular provider rated the physician higher on a credibility than those without, which led to stronger intentions to engage with the tweet and physician. CONCLUSIONS: The findings add to existing research by showing how the social context of information seeking on social media shapes the credibility of a given professional. Practical implications for professionals engaging with the public on social media and combating false information include moving past debates about casual versus formal appearances and toward identifying ways to segment audiences based on factors like their backgrounds (eg, experiences with health care providers). JMIR Publications 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9987183/ /pubmed/37113807 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34525 Text en ©DaJuan Ferrell, Celeste Campos-Castillo. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 13.06.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://infodemiology.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ferrell, DaJuan
Campos-Castillo, Celeste
Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title_full Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title_short Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study
title_sort factors affecting physicians’ credibility on twitter when sharing health information: online experimental study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113807
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34525
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrelldajuan factorsaffectingphysicianscredibilityontwitterwhensharinghealthinformationonlineexperimentalstudy
AT camposcastilloceleste factorsaffectingphysicianscredibilityontwitterwhensharinghealthinformationonlineexperimentalstudy