Cargando…

Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy

Abstract relations are considered the pinnacle of human cognition, allowing for analogical and logical reasoning, and possibly setting humans apart from other animal species. Recent experimental evidence showed that infants are capable of representing the abstract relations same and different, promp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00068
_version_ 1784901364560691200
author Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
author_facet Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
author_sort Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
collection PubMed
description Abstract relations are considered the pinnacle of human cognition, allowing for analogical and logical reasoning, and possibly setting humans apart from other animal species. Recent experimental evidence showed that infants are capable of representing the abstract relations same and different, prompting the question of the format of such representations. In a propositional language of thought, abstract relations would be represented in the form of discrete symbols. Is this format available to pre-lexical infants? We report six experiments (N = 192) relying on pupillometry and investigating how preverbal 10- to 12-month-old infants represent the relation same. We found that infants’ ability to represent the relation same is impacted by the number of individual entities taking part in the relation. Infants could represent that four syllables were the same and generalized that relation to novel sequences (Experiments 1 and 4). However, they failed to generalize the relation same when it involved 5 or 6 syllables (Experiments 2–3), showing that infants’ representation of the relation same is constrained by the limits of working memory capacity. Infants also failed to form a representation equivalent to all the same, which could apply to a varying number of same syllables (Experiments 5–6). These results highlight important discontinuities along cognitive development. Contrary to adults, preverbal infants lack a discrete symbol for the relation same, and rather build a representation of the relation by assembling symbols for individual entities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9987345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99873452023-03-07 Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy Hochmann, Jean-Rémy Open Mind (Camb) Research Article Abstract relations are considered the pinnacle of human cognition, allowing for analogical and logical reasoning, and possibly setting humans apart from other animal species. Recent experimental evidence showed that infants are capable of representing the abstract relations same and different, prompting the question of the format of such representations. In a propositional language of thought, abstract relations would be represented in the form of discrete symbols. Is this format available to pre-lexical infants? We report six experiments (N = 192) relying on pupillometry and investigating how preverbal 10- to 12-month-old infants represent the relation same. We found that infants’ ability to represent the relation same is impacted by the number of individual entities taking part in the relation. Infants could represent that four syllables were the same and generalized that relation to novel sequences (Experiments 1 and 4). However, they failed to generalize the relation same when it involved 5 or 6 syllables (Experiments 2–3), showing that infants’ representation of the relation same is constrained by the limits of working memory capacity. Infants also failed to form a representation equivalent to all the same, which could apply to a varying number of same syllables (Experiments 5–6). These results highlight important discontinuities along cognitive development. Contrary to adults, preverbal infants lack a discrete symbol for the relation same, and rather build a representation of the relation by assembling symbols for individual entities. MIT Press 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9987345/ /pubmed/36891038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00068 Text en © 2022 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title_full Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title_fullStr Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title_full_unstemmed Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title_short Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy
title_sort representations of abstract relations in infancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00068
work_keys_str_mv AT hochmannjeanremy representationsofabstractrelationsininfancy