Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?

Prediction tools offer great promise for clinicians in the prevention and treatment of psychosis, but none has been routinely implemented. Greater methodological rigour in the development and evaluation of these tools, along with consideration of a range of performance criteria, is necessary to maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyedsalehi, Aida, Lennox, Belinda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41582-023-00787-1
_version_ 1784901369050693632
author Seyedsalehi, Aida
Lennox, Belinda
author_facet Seyedsalehi, Aida
Lennox, Belinda
author_sort Seyedsalehi, Aida
collection PubMed
description Prediction tools offer great promise for clinicians in the prevention and treatment of psychosis, but none has been routinely implemented. Greater methodological rigour in the development and evaluation of these tools, along with consideration of a range of performance criteria, is necessary to maximize their potential for improving clinical decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9987363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99873632023-03-06 Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’? Seyedsalehi, Aida Lennox, Belinda Nat Rev Neurol Comment Prediction tools offer great promise for clinicians in the prevention and treatment of psychosis, but none has been routinely implemented. Greater methodological rigour in the development and evaluation of these tools, along with consideration of a range of performance criteria, is necessary to maximize their potential for improving clinical decision making. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9987363/ /pubmed/36879034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41582-023-00787-1 Text en © Springer Nature Limited 2023 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Comment
Seyedsalehi, Aida
Lennox, Belinda
Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title_full Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title_fullStr Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title_full_unstemmed Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title_short Predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
title_sort predictive tools in psychosis: what is ‘good enough’?
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41582-023-00787-1
work_keys_str_mv AT seyedsalehiaida predictivetoolsinpsychosiswhatisgoodenough
AT lennoxbelinda predictivetoolsinpsychosiswhatisgoodenough

Ejemplares similares