Cargando…

Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldossary, Nada Jaber, Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa, Waris, Abu, Siddique, Nadeem, Khan, Muhammad Ajmal, Javaid, Syed Sarmad, Al-Rubaish, Omar I., Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh, Lasrado, Savita, Menezes, Ritesh G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786250
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086
_version_ 1784901394246926336
author Aldossary, Nada Jaber
Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa
Waris, Abu
Siddique, Nadeem
Khan, Muhammad Ajmal
Javaid, Syed Sarmad
Al-Rubaish, Omar I.
Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh
Lasrado, Savita
Menezes, Ritesh G.
author_facet Aldossary, Nada Jaber
Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa
Waris, Abu
Siddique, Nadeem
Khan, Muhammad Ajmal
Javaid, Syed Sarmad
Al-Rubaish, Omar I.
Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh
Lasrado, Savita
Menezes, Ritesh G.
author_sort Aldossary, Nada Jaber
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on VWD. The publications on VWD from 1956 to 2021 were extracted using the Web of Science database. In the VWD domain, a total of 3,643 records were analyzed for authorship and collaboration patterns, yearly productivity, highly cited documents, relevant source of publication, most prolific scholars, productive countries, and organizations. RESULTS: The most productive journal, author, organization, and country were ‘Haemophilia’ with 439 publications, ‘Favaloro EJ’ with 119 publications, the ‘University of Milan’ with 192 publications, and the United States of America (USA) with 1,048 publications, respectively. The document with the highest citations was ‘Srivastava A, 2013, Haemophilia,’ which received 1,154 citations in total. In 2016, the highest number of publications shared by two author patterns was 28. With 199 publications, the year 2021 remained on the top, while the citation-wise analysis identified 2006 as the top year with 5,379 citations. CONCLUSIONS: Research productivity and publication trends on VWD revealed that the USA emerged as the most significant contributing country. The ‘University of Milan’ was the most significant contributing organization, while ‘Favaloro EJ’ was the most significant author. ‘Hemophilia’ was found to be the most significant journal in the field of VWD. It is recommended that researchers from countries with significant contributions to the field should collaborate with researchers from Asian countries and other countries that lack behind in research in the domain of VWD.(www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9987497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99874972023-03-07 Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends Aldossary, Nada Jaber Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa Waris, Abu Siddique, Nadeem Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Javaid, Syed Sarmad Al-Rubaish, Omar I. Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh Lasrado, Savita Menezes, Ritesh G. Acta Biomed Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on VWD. The publications on VWD from 1956 to 2021 were extracted using the Web of Science database. In the VWD domain, a total of 3,643 records were analyzed for authorship and collaboration patterns, yearly productivity, highly cited documents, relevant source of publication, most prolific scholars, productive countries, and organizations. RESULTS: The most productive journal, author, organization, and country were ‘Haemophilia’ with 439 publications, ‘Favaloro EJ’ with 119 publications, the ‘University of Milan’ with 192 publications, and the United States of America (USA) with 1,048 publications, respectively. The document with the highest citations was ‘Srivastava A, 2013, Haemophilia,’ which received 1,154 citations in total. In 2016, the highest number of publications shared by two author patterns was 28. With 199 publications, the year 2021 remained on the top, while the citation-wise analysis identified 2006 as the top year with 5,379 citations. CONCLUSIONS: Research productivity and publication trends on VWD revealed that the USA emerged as the most significant contributing country. The ‘University of Milan’ was the most significant contributing organization, while ‘Favaloro EJ’ was the most significant author. ‘Hemophilia’ was found to be the most significant journal in the field of VWD. It is recommended that researchers from countries with significant contributions to the field should collaborate with researchers from Asian countries and other countries that lack behind in research in the domain of VWD.(www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2023 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9987497/ /pubmed/36786250 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086 Text en Copyright: © 2023 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Review
Aldossary, Nada Jaber
Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa
Waris, Abu
Siddique, Nadeem
Khan, Muhammad Ajmal
Javaid, Syed Sarmad
Al-Rubaish, Omar I.
Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh
Lasrado, Savita
Menezes, Ritesh G.
Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title_full Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title_fullStr Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title_short Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
title_sort bibliometric analysis of the literature on von willebrand disease: research status and trends
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786250
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086
work_keys_str_mv AT aldossarynadajaber bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT rashidahmedmustafa bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT warisabu bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT siddiquenadeem bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT khanmuhammadajmal bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT javaidsyedsarmad bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT alrubaishomari bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT mohiuddinshamimshaikh bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT lasradosavita bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends
AT menezesriteshg bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends