Cargando…
Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mattioli 1885
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786250 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086 |
_version_ | 1784901394246926336 |
---|---|
author | Aldossary, Nada Jaber Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa Waris, Abu Siddique, Nadeem Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Javaid, Syed Sarmad Al-Rubaish, Omar I. Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh Lasrado, Savita Menezes, Ritesh G. |
author_facet | Aldossary, Nada Jaber Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa Waris, Abu Siddique, Nadeem Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Javaid, Syed Sarmad Al-Rubaish, Omar I. Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh Lasrado, Savita Menezes, Ritesh G. |
author_sort | Aldossary, Nada Jaber |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on VWD. The publications on VWD from 1956 to 2021 were extracted using the Web of Science database. In the VWD domain, a total of 3,643 records were analyzed for authorship and collaboration patterns, yearly productivity, highly cited documents, relevant source of publication, most prolific scholars, productive countries, and organizations. RESULTS: The most productive journal, author, organization, and country were ‘Haemophilia’ with 439 publications, ‘Favaloro EJ’ with 119 publications, the ‘University of Milan’ with 192 publications, and the United States of America (USA) with 1,048 publications, respectively. The document with the highest citations was ‘Srivastava A, 2013, Haemophilia,’ which received 1,154 citations in total. In 2016, the highest number of publications shared by two author patterns was 28. With 199 publications, the year 2021 remained on the top, while the citation-wise analysis identified 2006 as the top year with 5,379 citations. CONCLUSIONS: Research productivity and publication trends on VWD revealed that the USA emerged as the most significant contributing country. The ‘University of Milan’ was the most significant contributing organization, while ‘Favaloro EJ’ was the most significant author. ‘Hemophilia’ was found to be the most significant journal in the field of VWD. It is recommended that researchers from countries with significant contributions to the field should collaborate with researchers from Asian countries and other countries that lack behind in research in the domain of VWD.(www.actabiomedica.it) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9987497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Mattioli 1885 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99874972023-03-07 Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends Aldossary, Nada Jaber Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa Waris, Abu Siddique, Nadeem Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Javaid, Syed Sarmad Al-Rubaish, Omar I. Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh Lasrado, Savita Menezes, Ritesh G. Acta Biomed Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. The current study aims to demonstrate the research status and trends on VWD worldwide. METHODS: Bibliometric analysis was used to investigate the global research productivity and trends on VWD. The publications on VWD from 1956 to 2021 were extracted using the Web of Science database. In the VWD domain, a total of 3,643 records were analyzed for authorship and collaboration patterns, yearly productivity, highly cited documents, relevant source of publication, most prolific scholars, productive countries, and organizations. RESULTS: The most productive journal, author, organization, and country were ‘Haemophilia’ with 439 publications, ‘Favaloro EJ’ with 119 publications, the ‘University of Milan’ with 192 publications, and the United States of America (USA) with 1,048 publications, respectively. The document with the highest citations was ‘Srivastava A, 2013, Haemophilia,’ which received 1,154 citations in total. In 2016, the highest number of publications shared by two author patterns was 28. With 199 publications, the year 2021 remained on the top, while the citation-wise analysis identified 2006 as the top year with 5,379 citations. CONCLUSIONS: Research productivity and publication trends on VWD revealed that the USA emerged as the most significant contributing country. The ‘University of Milan’ was the most significant contributing organization, while ‘Favaloro EJ’ was the most significant author. ‘Hemophilia’ was found to be the most significant journal in the field of VWD. It is recommended that researchers from countries with significant contributions to the field should collaborate with researchers from Asian countries and other countries that lack behind in research in the domain of VWD.(www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2023 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9987497/ /pubmed/36786250 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086 Text en Copyright: © 2023 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Review Aldossary, Nada Jaber Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa Waris, Abu Siddique, Nadeem Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Javaid, Syed Sarmad Al-Rubaish, Omar I. Mohiuddin, Shamim Shaikh Lasrado, Savita Menezes, Ritesh G. Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title | Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title_full | Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title_fullStr | Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title_full_unstemmed | Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title_short | Bibliometric analysis of the literature on von Willebrand disease: research status and trends |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of the literature on von willebrand disease: research status and trends |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9987497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786250 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i1.14086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aldossarynadajaber bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT rashidahmedmustafa bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT warisabu bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT siddiquenadeem bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT khanmuhammadajmal bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT javaidsyedsarmad bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT alrubaishomari bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT mohiuddinshamimshaikh bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT lasradosavita bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends AT menezesriteshg bibliometricanalysisoftheliteratureonvonwillebranddiseaseresearchstatusandtrends |