Cargando…

Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations

Different follow-up strategies are available for patients with rectal cancer following curative treatment. A combination of biochemical testing and imaging investigation, associated with physical examination are commonly used. However, there is currently no consensus about the types of tests to perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauretta, Andrea, Montori, Giulia, Guerrini, Gian Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896297
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.177
_version_ 1784901612425183232
author Lauretta, Andrea
Montori, Giulia
Guerrini, Gian Piero
author_facet Lauretta, Andrea
Montori, Giulia
Guerrini, Gian Piero
author_sort Lauretta, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Different follow-up strategies are available for patients with rectal cancer following curative treatment. A combination of biochemical testing and imaging investigation, associated with physical examination are commonly used. However, there is currently no consensus about the types of tests to perform, the timing of the testing, and even the need for follow-up at all has been questioned. The aim of this study was to review the evidence of the impact of different follow-up tests and programs in patients with non-metastatic disease after definitive treatment of the primary. A literature review was performed of studies published on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to November 2022. Current published guidelines from the most authoritative specialty societies were also reviewed. According to the follow-up strategies available, the office visit is not efficient but represents the only way to maintain direct contact with the patient and is recommended by all authoritative specialty societies. In colorectal cancer surveillance, carcinoembryonic antigen represents the only established tumor marker. Abdominal and chest computed tomography scan is recommended considering that the liver and lungs are the most common sites of recurrence. Since local relapse in rectal cancer is higher than in colon cancer, endoscopic surveillance is mandatory. Different follow-up regimens have been published but randomized comparisons and meta-analyses do not allow to determine whether intensive or less intensive follow-up had any significant influence on survival and recurrence detection rate. The available data do not allow the drawing of final conclusions on the ideal surveillance methods and the frequency with which they should be applied. It is very useful and urgent for clinicians to identify a cost-effective strategy that allows early identification of recurrence with a special focus for high-risk patients and patients undergoing a “watch and wait” approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9988648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99886482023-03-08 Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations Lauretta, Andrea Montori, Giulia Guerrini, Gian Piero World J Gastrointest Surg Minireviews Different follow-up strategies are available for patients with rectal cancer following curative treatment. A combination of biochemical testing and imaging investigation, associated with physical examination are commonly used. However, there is currently no consensus about the types of tests to perform, the timing of the testing, and even the need for follow-up at all has been questioned. The aim of this study was to review the evidence of the impact of different follow-up tests and programs in patients with non-metastatic disease after definitive treatment of the primary. A literature review was performed of studies published on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to November 2022. Current published guidelines from the most authoritative specialty societies were also reviewed. According to the follow-up strategies available, the office visit is not efficient but represents the only way to maintain direct contact with the patient and is recommended by all authoritative specialty societies. In colorectal cancer surveillance, carcinoembryonic antigen represents the only established tumor marker. Abdominal and chest computed tomography scan is recommended considering that the liver and lungs are the most common sites of recurrence. Since local relapse in rectal cancer is higher than in colon cancer, endoscopic surveillance is mandatory. Different follow-up regimens have been published but randomized comparisons and meta-analyses do not allow to determine whether intensive or less intensive follow-up had any significant influence on survival and recurrence detection rate. The available data do not allow the drawing of final conclusions on the ideal surveillance methods and the frequency with which they should be applied. It is very useful and urgent for clinicians to identify a cost-effective strategy that allows early identification of recurrence with a special focus for high-risk patients and patients undergoing a “watch and wait” approach. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-02-27 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9988648/ /pubmed/36896297 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.177 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Minireviews
Lauretta, Andrea
Montori, Giulia
Guerrini, Gian Piero
Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title_full Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title_fullStr Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title_short Surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: How and how long? Review of current recommendations
title_sort surveillance strategies following curative resection and non-operative approach of rectal cancer: how and how long? review of current recommendations
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896297
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.177
work_keys_str_mv AT laurettaandrea surveillancestrategiesfollowingcurativeresectionandnonoperativeapproachofrectalcancerhowandhowlongreviewofcurrentrecommendations
AT montorigiulia surveillancestrategiesfollowingcurativeresectionandnonoperativeapproachofrectalcancerhowandhowlongreviewofcurrentrecommendations
AT guerrinigianpiero surveillancestrategiesfollowingcurativeresectionandnonoperativeapproachofrectalcancerhowandhowlongreviewofcurrentrecommendations