Cargando…
The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the C-X-C chemokines CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL10 contribute to inflammation during Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. METHODS: S. aureus endophthalmitis was induced by intravitreal injection of 5000 colony forming units of S. aureus into the eyes of C57BL/6J, CX...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.3.10 |
_version_ | 1784901623450959872 |
---|---|
author | Coburn, Phillip S. Parrott, Aaron C. Miller, Frederick C. LaGrow, Austin L. Mursalin, Md Huzzatul Callegan, Michelle C. |
author_facet | Coburn, Phillip S. Parrott, Aaron C. Miller, Frederick C. LaGrow, Austin L. Mursalin, Md Huzzatul Callegan, Michelle C. |
author_sort | Coburn, Phillip S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the C-X-C chemokines CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL10 contribute to inflammation during Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. METHODS: S. aureus endophthalmitis was induced by intravitreal injection of 5000 colony forming units of S. aureus into the eyes of C57BL/6J, CXCL1(−/−), CXCL2(−/−), or CXCL10(−/−) mice. At 12, 24, and 36 hours postinfection, bacterial counts, intraocular inflammation, and retinal function were assessed. Based on these results, the effectiveness of intravitreal administration of anti-CXCL1 in reducing inflammation and improving retinal function was evaluated in S. aureus–infected C57BL/6J mice. RESULTS: We observed significant attenuation of inflammation and improvement in retinal function in CXCL1(−/−) mice relative to C57BL/6J at 12 hours but not at 24 or 36 hours postinfection with S. aureus. Co-administration of anti-CXCL1 antibodies with S. aureus, however, did not improve retinal function or reduce inflammation at 12 hours postinfection. In CXCL2(−/−) and CXCL10(−/−) mice, retinal function and intraocular inflammation were not significantly different from those of C57BL/6J mice at 12 and 24 hours postinfection. At 12, 24, or 36 hours, an absence of CXCL1, CXCL2, or CXCL10 did not alter intraocular S. aureus concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: CXCL1 appears to contribute to the early host innate response to S. aureus endophthalmitis, but treatment with anti-CXCL1 did not effectively limit inflammation in this infection. CXCL2 and CXCL10 did not seem to play an integral role in inflammation during the early stages of S. aureus endophthalmitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9988700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99887002023-03-08 The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis Coburn, Phillip S. Parrott, Aaron C. Miller, Frederick C. LaGrow, Austin L. Mursalin, Md Huzzatul Callegan, Michelle C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Immunology and Microbiology PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the C-X-C chemokines CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL10 contribute to inflammation during Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. METHODS: S. aureus endophthalmitis was induced by intravitreal injection of 5000 colony forming units of S. aureus into the eyes of C57BL/6J, CXCL1(−/−), CXCL2(−/−), or CXCL10(−/−) mice. At 12, 24, and 36 hours postinfection, bacterial counts, intraocular inflammation, and retinal function were assessed. Based on these results, the effectiveness of intravitreal administration of anti-CXCL1 in reducing inflammation and improving retinal function was evaluated in S. aureus–infected C57BL/6J mice. RESULTS: We observed significant attenuation of inflammation and improvement in retinal function in CXCL1(−/−) mice relative to C57BL/6J at 12 hours but not at 24 or 36 hours postinfection with S. aureus. Co-administration of anti-CXCL1 antibodies with S. aureus, however, did not improve retinal function or reduce inflammation at 12 hours postinfection. In CXCL2(−/−) and CXCL10(−/−) mice, retinal function and intraocular inflammation were not significantly different from those of C57BL/6J mice at 12 and 24 hours postinfection. At 12, 24, or 36 hours, an absence of CXCL1, CXCL2, or CXCL10 did not alter intraocular S. aureus concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: CXCL1 appears to contribute to the early host innate response to S. aureus endophthalmitis, but treatment with anti-CXCL1 did not effectively limit inflammation in this infection. CXCL2 and CXCL10 did not seem to play an integral role in inflammation during the early stages of S. aureus endophthalmitis. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9988700/ /pubmed/36867134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.3.10 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Immunology and Microbiology Coburn, Phillip S. Parrott, Aaron C. Miller, Frederick C. LaGrow, Austin L. Mursalin, Md Huzzatul Callegan, Michelle C. The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title | The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title_full | The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title_fullStr | The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title_short | The Role of C-X-C Chemokines in Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis |
title_sort | role of c-x-c chemokines in staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis |
topic | Immunology and Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36867134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.64.3.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coburnphillips theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT parrottaaronc theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT millerfrederickc theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT lagrowaustinl theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT mursalinmdhuzzatul theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT calleganmichellec theroleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT coburnphillips roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT parrottaaronc roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT millerfrederickc roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT lagrowaustinl roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT mursalinmdhuzzatul roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis AT calleganmichellec roleofcxcchemokinesinstaphylococcusaureusendophthalmitis |