Cargando…

Habituation of changed acoustics properties after canal wall down mastoidectomy

PURPOSE: Our objective is to evaluate the effect of habituation on the altered ear canal acoustics after canal wall down mastoidectomy. METHODS: A total of 11 participants with single sided dry cavities and normal contralateral ear canals with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study. Fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zwemstra, M. R., Brienesse, P., de Wolf, M. J. F., van Spronsen, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36115871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07652-9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Our objective is to evaluate the effect of habituation on the altered ear canal acoustics after canal wall down mastoidectomy. METHODS: A total of 11 participants with single sided dry cavities and normal contralateral ear canals with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study. Filtered sound fragments were created that simulate the different acoustic properties based on the participants Real Ear to Coupler Difference (RECD) of the cavity ear and the contralateral normal ear canal. These filtered sound fragments are presented to the cavity ear canal and the contralateral normal ear canal using inserts earphones. Participants performed a subjective quality assessment of the sound fragments using paired comparison with a seven-point scale (− 3 till + 3). RESULTS: Mean assessment of sound quality revealed the following results; naturalness of sounds of the cavity ear canal is 0.29 (± 1.41; ns) in favour of the filtered sound fragment of the normal ear canal. Mean assessment of sharpness of sounds in the cavity ear canal is 1.55 (± 1.21, p = 0.55) in favour of the filtered sound fragment of the normal ear canal. Overall preference in the cavity ear canal was in favour of the normal ear canal acoustics 0.72 (SD ± 1.54 p = 0.224). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cavity ear canals seem to habituate to their altered ear canal acoustics. Transforming the ear canal acoustics of the cavity ear to normal ear canal acoustics seem to sharpen the incoming sounds. Overall assessment of quality of sound of the normal ear canal acoustics is better than the cavity acoustics.