Cargando…

The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of elective neck dissection (END) on oncological outcome in early-stage nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). METHODS: In total, 87 patients with T1 (n = 59; 67.8%) and T2 (n = 28; 32.2%) SCCs were evaluated regarding performance of END, regional recurrences (RR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lill, Claudia, Erovic, Boban M., Seemann, Rudolf, Faisal, Muhammad, Stelter, Klaus, Gandler, Bernd, Frommlet, Florian, Strobl, Andreas, Formanek, Michael, Janik, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07718-8
_version_ 1784901637513412608
author Lill, Claudia
Erovic, Boban M.
Seemann, Rudolf
Faisal, Muhammad
Stelter, Klaus
Gandler, Bernd
Frommlet, Florian
Strobl, Andreas
Formanek, Michael
Janik, Stefan
author_facet Lill, Claudia
Erovic, Boban M.
Seemann, Rudolf
Faisal, Muhammad
Stelter, Klaus
Gandler, Bernd
Frommlet, Florian
Strobl, Andreas
Formanek, Michael
Janik, Stefan
author_sort Lill, Claudia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of elective neck dissection (END) on oncological outcome in early-stage nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). METHODS: In total, 87 patients with T1 (n = 59; 67.8%) and T2 (n = 28; 32.2%) SCCs were evaluated regarding performance of END, regional recurrences (RR) and its impact on cancer-specific survival (CSS). We further created a risk score based on T-classification, tumor subsite and grading to identify patients whom may benefit from END and calculated the corresponding numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent RR. RESULTS: Nine (10.3%) patients experienced RR of whom 3 (5.1%) were T1 and 6 (21.4%) T2 tumors (p = 0.042). All RR originated from moderately or poorly differentiated (G2–G3) SCCs of the nasal septum or vestibule. END was done in 15 (17.2%) patients and none of those experienced RR (p = 0.121). Onset of RR represented the worst prognostic factor for CSS (HR 23.3; p = 0.007) with a 5y-CSS of 44.4% vs. 97.3% (p < 0.001). RR occurred in none of the patients with no or low risk scores compared to 31.6% (6/19) in patients with high-risk scores (p = 0.006). Accordingly, three high-risk patients would need to undergo END (NNT 2.63) to prevent RR compared to a NNT of 8 for the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, occurrence of RR significantly deteriorates outcome in early stage nasal cavity SCCs, which could be effectively reduced by performance of END. The importance of END is currently underestimated and our proposed risk score helps identifying those patients who will benefit from END.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9988772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99887722023-03-08 The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas Lill, Claudia Erovic, Boban M. Seemann, Rudolf Faisal, Muhammad Stelter, Klaus Gandler, Bernd Frommlet, Florian Strobl, Andreas Formanek, Michael Janik, Stefan Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of elective neck dissection (END) on oncological outcome in early-stage nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). METHODS: In total, 87 patients with T1 (n = 59; 67.8%) and T2 (n = 28; 32.2%) SCCs were evaluated regarding performance of END, regional recurrences (RR) and its impact on cancer-specific survival (CSS). We further created a risk score based on T-classification, tumor subsite and grading to identify patients whom may benefit from END and calculated the corresponding numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent RR. RESULTS: Nine (10.3%) patients experienced RR of whom 3 (5.1%) were T1 and 6 (21.4%) T2 tumors (p = 0.042). All RR originated from moderately or poorly differentiated (G2–G3) SCCs of the nasal septum or vestibule. END was done in 15 (17.2%) patients and none of those experienced RR (p = 0.121). Onset of RR represented the worst prognostic factor for CSS (HR 23.3; p = 0.007) with a 5y-CSS of 44.4% vs. 97.3% (p < 0.001). RR occurred in none of the patients with no or low risk scores compared to 31.6% (6/19) in patients with high-risk scores (p = 0.006). Accordingly, three high-risk patients would need to undergo END (NNT 2.63) to prevent RR compared to a NNT of 8 for the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, occurrence of RR significantly deteriorates outcome in early stage nasal cavity SCCs, which could be effectively reduced by performance of END. The importance of END is currently underestimated and our proposed risk score helps identifying those patients who will benefit from END. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9988772/ /pubmed/36342517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07718-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Lill, Claudia
Erovic, Boban M.
Seemann, Rudolf
Faisal, Muhammad
Stelter, Klaus
Gandler, Bernd
Frommlet, Florian
Strobl, Andreas
Formanek, Michael
Janik, Stefan
The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title_full The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title_fullStr The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title_short The role of elective neck dissection in T1 and T2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
title_sort role of elective neck dissection in t1 and t2 nasal cavity squamous cell carcinomas
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07718-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lillclaudia theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT erovicbobanm theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT seemannrudolf theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT faisalmuhammad theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT stelterklaus theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT gandlerbernd theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT frommletflorian theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT stroblandreas theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT formanekmichael theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT janikstefan theroleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT lillclaudia roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT erovicbobanm roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT seemannrudolf roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT faisalmuhammad roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT stelterklaus roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT gandlerbernd roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT frommletflorian roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT stroblandreas roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT formanekmichael roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas
AT janikstefan roleofelectiveneckdissectionint1andt2nasalcavitysquamouscellcarcinomas