Cargando…

Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Port wine stains (PWS) often cause cosmetic effects and psychological distress. Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are the most commonly used treatments. PDL is still the “gold standard” of therapy to date. However, its shortcomings have become apparent as clinical ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ling, Li, Lei, Huang, Chao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1111234
_version_ 1784901677819625472
author Wang, Ling
Li, Lei
Huang, Chao
author_facet Wang, Ling
Li, Lei
Huang, Chao
author_sort Wang, Ling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Port wine stains (PWS) often cause cosmetic effects and psychological distress. Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are the most commonly used treatments. PDL is still the “gold standard” of therapy to date. However, its shortcomings have become apparent as clinical applications have increased. PDT has been proven as an alternative to PDL. Patients with PWS still lack enough evidence about PDT to make informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the safety and effectiveness of PDT for PWS. METHODS: The online datasets, comprising PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for meta-analysis-relevant publications. Two reviewers separately evaluated the risk of bias in each listed study. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the treatment and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Our search retrieved 740 hits and only 26 studies were finally included. Among the 26 studies included, 3 were randomized clinical trials, and 23 were prospective or retrospective cohort investigations. Based on a gathered assessment, the percentage of individuals achieving a 60% improvement was estimated to be 51.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7–64.1; I(2) = 83.8%] and a ≥75% improvement was 20.5% (95% CI: 14.5–26.5; I(2) = 78.2%) after 1–8.2 treatment sessions (GRADE score: very low). Due to the statistical diversity of the meta-analysis, a subgroup assessment was performed to determine the sources of diversity. The collected findings indicated that the impact of PDT on enhancing the medical effectiveness of PWS was significant in different treatment sessions, different types of ages, different locations of PWS, and different types of PWS. Pain and edema occurred in most patients. Hyperpigmentation was present in 7.9–34.1% of the patients in 17 studies. Photosensitive dermatitis, hypopigmentation, blister, and scar were infrequently reported, with 0–5.8% incidences. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy is recommended as a safe and effective treatment for PWS based on the current evidence. However, our findings are based on poor-quality evidence. Therefore, comparative investigations of a large scale and high quality are necessary to support this conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9988944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99889442023-03-08 Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Ling Li, Lei Huang, Chao Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Port wine stains (PWS) often cause cosmetic effects and psychological distress. Pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are the most commonly used treatments. PDL is still the “gold standard” of therapy to date. However, its shortcomings have become apparent as clinical applications have increased. PDT has been proven as an alternative to PDL. Patients with PWS still lack enough evidence about PDT to make informed treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the safety and effectiveness of PDT for PWS. METHODS: The online datasets, comprising PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for meta-analysis-relevant publications. Two reviewers separately evaluated the risk of bias in each listed study. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the treatment and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Our search retrieved 740 hits and only 26 studies were finally included. Among the 26 studies included, 3 were randomized clinical trials, and 23 were prospective or retrospective cohort investigations. Based on a gathered assessment, the percentage of individuals achieving a 60% improvement was estimated to be 51.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7–64.1; I(2) = 83.8%] and a ≥75% improvement was 20.5% (95% CI: 14.5–26.5; I(2) = 78.2%) after 1–8.2 treatment sessions (GRADE score: very low). Due to the statistical diversity of the meta-analysis, a subgroup assessment was performed to determine the sources of diversity. The collected findings indicated that the impact of PDT on enhancing the medical effectiveness of PWS was significant in different treatment sessions, different types of ages, different locations of PWS, and different types of PWS. Pain and edema occurred in most patients. Hyperpigmentation was present in 7.9–34.1% of the patients in 17 studies. Photosensitive dermatitis, hypopigmentation, blister, and scar were infrequently reported, with 0–5.8% incidences. CONCLUSION: Photodynamic therapy is recommended as a safe and effective treatment for PWS based on the current evidence. However, our findings are based on poor-quality evidence. Therefore, comparative investigations of a large scale and high quality are necessary to support this conclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9988944/ /pubmed/36895715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1111234 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wang, Li and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Wang, Ling
Li, Lei
Huang, Chao
Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of port wine stains: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1111234
work_keys_str_mv AT wangling efficacyofphotodynamictherapyinthetreatmentofportwinestainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lilei efficacyofphotodynamictherapyinthetreatmentofportwinestainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangchao efficacyofphotodynamictherapyinthetreatmentofportwinestainsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis