Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis

Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Qiang, Zhang, CongMing, Bai, HuanAn, Wang, Qian, Li, Zhong, Lu, Yao, Ma, Teng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976
_version_ 1784901720964333568
author Huang, Qiang
Zhang, CongMing
Bai, HuanAn
Wang, Qian
Li, Zhong
Lu, Yao
Ma, Teng
author_facet Huang, Qiang
Zhang, CongMing
Bai, HuanAn
Wang, Qian
Li, Zhong
Lu, Yao
Ma, Teng
author_sort Huang, Qiang
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by shortening the moment and reducing stress concentration. Each modified intramedullary implant was compared with cannulated screws (CSs) through finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Five different models were included: three cannulated screws (CSs, Model 1) in an inverted triangle configuration, the dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHS + AS, Model 2), the femoral neck system (FNS, Model 3), the modified intramedullary femoral neck system (IFNS, Model 4), and the modified intramedullary interlocking system (IIS, Model 5). Three-dimensional (3D) models of femur and implants were constructed by using 3D modelling software. Three load cases were simulated to assess the maximal displacement of models and fracture surface. The maximal stress at the bone and implants was also evaluated. Results: FEA data showed that Model 5 had the best performance in terms of maximum displacement while Model 1 had the worst performance for this index under axial load of 2100 N. With respect to Maximum stress, Model 4 had the best performance while Model 2 had the worst performance under axial load. The general trends under bending and torsion load were consistent with that under axial load. Our data demonstrated that the two modified intramedullary implants exhibited the best biomechanical stability, followed by FNS and DHS + AS, and then three cannulated screws in axial, bending, and torsion load cases. Conclusion: The two modified intramedullary designs showed the best biomechanical performance among the five implants included in this study. Therefore, this might provide some new options for trauma surgeons to deal with unstable femoral neck fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99892152023-03-08 Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis Huang, Qiang Zhang, CongMing Bai, HuanAn Wang, Qian Li, Zhong Lu, Yao Ma, Teng Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by shortening the moment and reducing stress concentration. Each modified intramedullary implant was compared with cannulated screws (CSs) through finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Five different models were included: three cannulated screws (CSs, Model 1) in an inverted triangle configuration, the dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHS + AS, Model 2), the femoral neck system (FNS, Model 3), the modified intramedullary femoral neck system (IFNS, Model 4), and the modified intramedullary interlocking system (IIS, Model 5). Three-dimensional (3D) models of femur and implants were constructed by using 3D modelling software. Three load cases were simulated to assess the maximal displacement of models and fracture surface. The maximal stress at the bone and implants was also evaluated. Results: FEA data showed that Model 5 had the best performance in terms of maximum displacement while Model 1 had the worst performance for this index under axial load of 2100 N. With respect to Maximum stress, Model 4 had the best performance while Model 2 had the worst performance under axial load. The general trends under bending and torsion load were consistent with that under axial load. Our data demonstrated that the two modified intramedullary implants exhibited the best biomechanical stability, followed by FNS and DHS + AS, and then three cannulated screws in axial, bending, and torsion load cases. Conclusion: The two modified intramedullary designs showed the best biomechanical performance among the five implants included in this study. Therefore, this might provide some new options for trauma surgeons to deal with unstable femoral neck fractures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9989215/ /pubmed/36896014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang, Zhang, Bai, Wang, Li, Lu and Ma. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Huang, Qiang
Zhang, CongMing
Bai, HuanAn
Wang, Qian
Li, Zhong
Lu, Yao
Ma, Teng
Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896014
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976
work_keys_str_mv AT huangqiang biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhangcongming biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT baihuanan biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangqian biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT lizhong biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT luyao biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis
AT mateng biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis