Cargando…
Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis
Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976 |
_version_ | 1784901720964333568 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Qiang Zhang, CongMing Bai, HuanAn Wang, Qian Li, Zhong Lu, Yao Ma, Teng |
author_facet | Huang, Qiang Zhang, CongMing Bai, HuanAn Wang, Qian Li, Zhong Lu, Yao Ma, Teng |
author_sort | Huang, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by shortening the moment and reducing stress concentration. Each modified intramedullary implant was compared with cannulated screws (CSs) through finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Five different models were included: three cannulated screws (CSs, Model 1) in an inverted triangle configuration, the dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHS + AS, Model 2), the femoral neck system (FNS, Model 3), the modified intramedullary femoral neck system (IFNS, Model 4), and the modified intramedullary interlocking system (IIS, Model 5). Three-dimensional (3D) models of femur and implants were constructed by using 3D modelling software. Three load cases were simulated to assess the maximal displacement of models and fracture surface. The maximal stress at the bone and implants was also evaluated. Results: FEA data showed that Model 5 had the best performance in terms of maximum displacement while Model 1 had the worst performance for this index under axial load of 2100 N. With respect to Maximum stress, Model 4 had the best performance while Model 2 had the worst performance under axial load. The general trends under bending and torsion load were consistent with that under axial load. Our data demonstrated that the two modified intramedullary implants exhibited the best biomechanical stability, followed by FNS and DHS + AS, and then three cannulated screws in axial, bending, and torsion load cases. Conclusion: The two modified intramedullary designs showed the best biomechanical performance among the five implants included in this study. Therefore, this might provide some new options for trauma surgeons to deal with unstable femoral neck fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9989215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99892152023-03-08 Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis Huang, Qiang Zhang, CongMing Bai, HuanAn Wang, Qian Li, Zhong Lu, Yao Ma, Teng Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Purpose: The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by shortening the moment and reducing stress concentration. Each modified intramedullary implant was compared with cannulated screws (CSs) through finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: Five different models were included: three cannulated screws (CSs, Model 1) in an inverted triangle configuration, the dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHS + AS, Model 2), the femoral neck system (FNS, Model 3), the modified intramedullary femoral neck system (IFNS, Model 4), and the modified intramedullary interlocking system (IIS, Model 5). Three-dimensional (3D) models of femur and implants were constructed by using 3D modelling software. Three load cases were simulated to assess the maximal displacement of models and fracture surface. The maximal stress at the bone and implants was also evaluated. Results: FEA data showed that Model 5 had the best performance in terms of maximum displacement while Model 1 had the worst performance for this index under axial load of 2100 N. With respect to Maximum stress, Model 4 had the best performance while Model 2 had the worst performance under axial load. The general trends under bending and torsion load were consistent with that under axial load. Our data demonstrated that the two modified intramedullary implants exhibited the best biomechanical stability, followed by FNS and DHS + AS, and then three cannulated screws in axial, bending, and torsion load cases. Conclusion: The two modified intramedullary designs showed the best biomechanical performance among the five implants included in this study. Therefore, this might provide some new options for trauma surgeons to deal with unstable femoral neck fractures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9989215/ /pubmed/36896014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976 Text en Copyright © 2023 Huang, Zhang, Bai, Wang, Li, Lu and Ma. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Huang, Qiang Zhang, CongMing Bai, HuanAn Wang, Qian Li, Zhong Lu, Yao Ma, Teng Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title | Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title_full | Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title_short | Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis |
title_sort | biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangqiang biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT zhangcongming biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT baihuanan biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT wangqian biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT lizhong biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT luyao biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis AT mateng biomechanicalevaluationoftwomodifiedintramedullaryfixationsystemfortreatingunstablefemoralneckfracturesafiniteelementanalysis |