Cargando…

Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majdinasab, Nastaran, Orakifar, Neda, Kouti, Leila, Shamsaei, Gholamreza, Seyedtabib, Maryam, Jafari, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886
_version_ 1784901744439853056
author Majdinasab, Nastaran
Orakifar, Neda
Kouti, Leila
Shamsaei, Gholamreza
Seyedtabib, Maryam
Jafari, Mohammad
author_facet Majdinasab, Nastaran
Orakifar, Neda
Kouti, Leila
Shamsaei, Gholamreza
Seyedtabib, Maryam
Jafari, Mohammad
author_sort Majdinasab, Nastaran
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment effects in the MS Patients with OAB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 70 MS patients suffering from OAB enrolled in this clinical trial study. Patients with a score of at least 3 according to the OAB questionnaire were randomly divided into two groups (35 patients in each group). In one group, patients received SS (5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg/day for another 8 weeks) and in a second group, patients were treated by PTNS (12 weekly session, 30 min). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of patients participating in this study was 39.82 (9.088) and 42.41 (9.175) years for the SS group and the PTNS group, respectively. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in urinary incontinence, micturition, and daytime frequency (p < 0.001). Patients in the SS group had a better response for urinary incontinence after 12 weeks compared to the PTNS group. Also, patients in the SS group reported higher satisfaction and less daytime frequency compared to the PTNS group. CONCLUSION: SS and PTNS were effective for improving the OAB symptoms in patients with MS. However, patients demonstrated a better experience with SS in terms of daytime frequency, urinary incontinence, and treatment satisfaction rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99893112023-03-08 Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis Majdinasab, Nastaran Orakifar, Neda Kouti, Leila Shamsaei, Gholamreza Seyedtabib, Maryam Jafari, Mohammad Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment effects in the MS Patients with OAB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 70 MS patients suffering from OAB enrolled in this clinical trial study. Patients with a score of at least 3 according to the OAB questionnaire were randomly divided into two groups (35 patients in each group). In one group, patients received SS (5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg/day for another 8 weeks) and in a second group, patients were treated by PTNS (12 weekly session, 30 min). RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of patients participating in this study was 39.82 (9.088) and 42.41 (9.175) years for the SS group and the PTNS group, respectively. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in urinary incontinence, micturition, and daytime frequency (p < 0.001). Patients in the SS group had a better response for urinary incontinence after 12 weeks compared to the PTNS group. Also, patients in the SS group reported higher satisfaction and less daytime frequency compared to the PTNS group. CONCLUSION: SS and PTNS were effective for improving the OAB symptoms in patients with MS. However, patients demonstrated a better experience with SS in terms of daytime frequency, urinary incontinence, and treatment satisfaction rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9989311/ /pubmed/36895417 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886 Text en Copyright © 2023 Majdinasab, Orakifar, Kouti, Shamsaei, Seyedtabib and Jafari. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Majdinasab, Nastaran
Orakifar, Neda
Kouti, Leila
Shamsaei, Gholamreza
Seyedtabib, Maryam
Jafari, Mohammad
Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895417
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886
work_keys_str_mv AT majdinasabnastaran solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT orakifarneda solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT koutileila solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT shamsaeigholamreza solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT seyedtabibmaryam solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT jafarimohammad solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis