Cargando…

Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

The Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period (MAPPP) app is a free tool providing up-to-date guidelines on the periprocedural management of patients on long-term anticoagulants. After validating its effectiveness in the post-procedural period, we aimed to study its overall cost-eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jason J., Koulas, Ioannis, Myrka, Anne, Spyropoulos, Alex C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231154553
_version_ 1784901757829120000
author Wang, Jason J.
Koulas, Ioannis
Myrka, Anne
Spyropoulos, Alex C.
author_facet Wang, Jason J.
Koulas, Ioannis
Myrka, Anne
Spyropoulos, Alex C.
author_sort Wang, Jason J.
collection PubMed
description The Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period (MAPPP) app is a free tool providing up-to-date guidelines on the periprocedural management of patients on long-term anticoagulants. After validating its effectiveness in the post-procedural period, we aimed to study its overall cost-effectiveness. SF-12 surveys were sent to eligible patients, converted into SF-6D forms, and subsequently into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The number of 30-day readmissions was used to calculate hospitalization costs, utilizing publicly available data. From 1/1/2018 to 1/31/2019, 642 patients were screened for enrollment, with an overall response rate of 94% (164/175) among the consented and 49% (164/336) among all eligible patients. The average QALY score was 0.7134 (95% CI [0.6836, 0.7431]) for the patients whose treatment plan followed the MAPPP app recommendations (acceptance group) and 0.7104 (95% CI [0.6760, 0.7448]) for those who did not (rejection group), without statistically significant differences. The difference in ICER scores was −$429 866.67, with the negative sign demonstrating that acceptance was the dominant strategy. By utilizing QALYs and ICER scores we have shown that the acceptance of MAPPP app recommendations is the dominant strategy for the periprocedural management of patients on long-term anticoagulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99893972023-03-08 Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Wang, Jason J. Koulas, Ioannis Myrka, Anne Spyropoulos, Alex C. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Manuscript The Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period (MAPPP) app is a free tool providing up-to-date guidelines on the periprocedural management of patients on long-term anticoagulants. After validating its effectiveness in the post-procedural period, we aimed to study its overall cost-effectiveness. SF-12 surveys were sent to eligible patients, converted into SF-6D forms, and subsequently into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The number of 30-day readmissions was used to calculate hospitalization costs, utilizing publicly available data. From 1/1/2018 to 1/31/2019, 642 patients were screened for enrollment, with an overall response rate of 94% (164/175) among the consented and 49% (164/336) among all eligible patients. The average QALY score was 0.7134 (95% CI [0.6836, 0.7431]) for the patients whose treatment plan followed the MAPPP app recommendations (acceptance group) and 0.7104 (95% CI [0.6760, 0.7448]) for those who did not (rejection group), without statistically significant differences. The difference in ICER scores was −$429 866.67, with the negative sign demonstrating that acceptance was the dominant strategy. By utilizing QALYs and ICER scores we have shown that the acceptance of MAPPP app recommendations is the dominant strategy for the periprocedural management of patients on long-term anticoagulation. SAGE Publications 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9989397/ /pubmed/36872909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231154553 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Wang, Jason J.
Koulas, Ioannis
Myrka, Anne
Spyropoulos, Alex C.
Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_fullStr Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_short Implementation of the Management of Anticoagulation in the Periprocedural Period App into an Electronic Health Record: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
title_sort implementation of the management of anticoagulation in the periprocedural period app into an electronic health record: a cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10760296231154553
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjasonj implementationofthemanagementofanticoagulationintheperiproceduralperiodappintoanelectronichealthrecordacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT koulasioannis implementationofthemanagementofanticoagulationintheperiproceduralperiodappintoanelectronichealthrecordacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT myrkaanne implementationofthemanagementofanticoagulationintheperiproceduralperiodappintoanelectronichealthrecordacosteffectivenessanalysis
AT spyropoulosalexc implementationofthemanagementofanticoagulationintheperiproceduralperiodappintoanelectronichealthrecordacosteffectivenessanalysis