Cargando…

Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing use of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) recently. However, the periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes of TTVR remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcomes in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation undergoing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zexuan, Zhu, Wengen, Kaisaier, Wulamiding, Kadier, Miriding, Li, Runkai, Tursun, Gulpari, Dong, Yugang, Liu, Chen, Chen, Yili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231158607
_version_ 1784901758336630784
author Wu, Zexuan
Zhu, Wengen
Kaisaier, Wulamiding
Kadier, Miriding
Li, Runkai
Tursun, Gulpari
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Chen, Yili
author_facet Wu, Zexuan
Zhu, Wengen
Kaisaier, Wulamiding
Kadier, Miriding
Li, Runkai
Tursun, Gulpari
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Chen, Yili
author_sort Wu, Zexuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing use of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) recently. However, the periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes of TTVR remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcomes in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation undergoing TTVR. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for clinical trials and observational studies until March 2022. Studies reporting the incidence of clinical outcomes after TTVR were included. The clinical outcomes included periprocedural, short-term (in-hospital or within 30 days), and long-term (>6-month follow-up) outcomes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality whereas the secondary outcomes included technical success, procedural success, cardiovascular mortality, rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF), major bleeding, and single leaflet device attachment. The incidence of these outcomes across studies was pooled by a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies with 896 patients were included. A total of 729 (81.4%) patients underwent isolated TTVR while only 167 (18.6%) patients underwent combined mitral and tricuspid valve repair. Over 80% of the patients used coaptation devices while approximately 20% used annuloplasty devices. The median follow-up duration was 365 days. Technical and procedural success was high at 93.9% and 82.1%, respectively. The pooled perioperative, short-term, and long-term all-cause mortality for patients undergoing TTVR was 1.0%, 3.3%, and 14.1%, respectively. The long-term cardiovascular mortality rate was 5.3% while the HHF rate was 21.5%. Major bleeding and single leaflet device attachment were two major complications, accounting for 14.3% and 6.4%, respectively, during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: TTVR is associated with high procedural success and low procedural and short-term mortality. However, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HHF rates remain high during long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022310020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99893992023-03-08 Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis Wu, Zexuan Zhu, Wengen Kaisaier, Wulamiding Kadier, Miriding Li, Runkai Tursun, Gulpari Dong, Yugang Liu, Chen Chen, Yili Ther Adv Chronic Dis Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing use of transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) recently. However, the periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes of TTVR remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical outcomes in patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation undergoing TTVR. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE AND METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for clinical trials and observational studies until March 2022. Studies reporting the incidence of clinical outcomes after TTVR were included. The clinical outcomes included periprocedural, short-term (in-hospital or within 30 days), and long-term (>6-month follow-up) outcomes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality whereas the secondary outcomes included technical success, procedural success, cardiovascular mortality, rehospitalization for heart failure (HHF), major bleeding, and single leaflet device attachment. The incidence of these outcomes across studies was pooled by a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies with 896 patients were included. A total of 729 (81.4%) patients underwent isolated TTVR while only 167 (18.6%) patients underwent combined mitral and tricuspid valve repair. Over 80% of the patients used coaptation devices while approximately 20% used annuloplasty devices. The median follow-up duration was 365 days. Technical and procedural success was high at 93.9% and 82.1%, respectively. The pooled perioperative, short-term, and long-term all-cause mortality for patients undergoing TTVR was 1.0%, 3.3%, and 14.1%, respectively. The long-term cardiovascular mortality rate was 5.3% while the HHF rate was 21.5%. Major bleeding and single leaflet device attachment were two major complications, accounting for 14.3% and 6.4%, respectively, during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: TTVR is associated with high procedural success and low procedural and short-term mortality. However, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HHF rates remain high during long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022310020). SAGE Publications 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9989399/ /pubmed/36895329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231158607 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Wu, Zexuan
Zhu, Wengen
Kaisaier, Wulamiding
Kadier, Miriding
Li, Runkai
Tursun, Gulpari
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Chen, Yili
Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_short Periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
title_sort periprocedural, short-term, and long-term outcomes following transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: a systemic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20406223231158607
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzexuan periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuwengen periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kaisaierwulamiding periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kadiermiriding periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lirunkai periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tursungulpari periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dongyugang periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuchen periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyili periproceduralshorttermandlongtermoutcomesfollowingtranscathetertricuspidvalverepairasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis