Cargando…

Screening the risk of obstructive sleep apnea by utilizing supervised learning techniques based on anthropometric features and snoring events

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is typically diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG). However, PSG is time-consuming and has some clinical limitations. This study thus aimed to establish machine learning models to screen for the risk of having moderate-to-severe and severe OSA based on easily a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Cheng-Yu, Liu, Wen-Te, Hsu, Wen-Hua, Majumdar, Arnab, Stettler, Marc, Lee, Kang-Yun, Cheng, Wun-Hao, Wu, Dean, Lee, Hsin-Chien, Kuan, Yi-Chun, Wu, Cheng-Jung, Lin, Yi-Chih, Ho, Shu-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231152751
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is typically diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG). However, PSG is time-consuming and has some clinical limitations. This study thus aimed to establish machine learning models to screen for the risk of having moderate-to-severe and severe OSA based on easily acquired features. METHODS: We collected PSG data on 3529 patients from Taiwan and further derived the number of snoring events. Their baseline characteristics and anthropometric measures were obtained, and correlations among the collected variables were investigated. Next, six common supervised machine learning techniques were utilized, including random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and naïve Bayes (NB). First, data were independently separated into a training and validation dataset (80%) and a test dataset (20%). The approach with the highest accuracy in the training and validation phase was employed to classify the test dataset. Next, feature importance was investigated by calculating the Shapley value of every factor, which represented the impact on OSA risk screening. RESULTS: The RF produced the highest accuracy (of >70%) in the training and validation phase in screening for both OSA severities. Hence, we employed the RF to classify the test dataset, and results showed a 79.32% accuracy for moderate-to-severe OSA and 74.37% accuracy for severe OSA. Snoring events and the visceral fat level were the most and second most essential features of screening for OSA risk. CONCLUSIONS: The established model can be considered for screening for the risk of having moderate-to-severe or severe OSA.