Cargando…

COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis

OBJECTIVE: Addressing gaps in COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy research, the current study aimed to add depth and nuance to the exploratory research examining vaccine-hesitant groups. Using a larger, but more focused conversation occurring on social media, the results can be used by health communicators t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sussman, Kristen L., Bouchacourt, Lindsay, Bright, Laura F., Wilcox, Gary B., Mackert, Michael, Norwood, Aliza Steinberg, Allport Altillo, Brandon Shaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231158308
_version_ 1784901767248478208
author Sussman, Kristen L.
Bouchacourt, Lindsay
Bright, Laura F.
Wilcox, Gary B.
Mackert, Michael
Norwood, Aliza Steinberg
Allport Altillo, Brandon Shaun
author_facet Sussman, Kristen L.
Bouchacourt, Lindsay
Bright, Laura F.
Wilcox, Gary B.
Mackert, Michael
Norwood, Aliza Steinberg
Allport Altillo, Brandon Shaun
author_sort Sussman, Kristen L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Addressing gaps in COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy research, the current study aimed to add depth and nuance to the exploratory research examining vaccine-hesitant groups. Using a larger, but more focused conversation occurring on social media, the results can be used by health communicators to frame emotionally resonant messaging to improve COVID-19 vaccine advocacy while also mitigating negative concerns for vaccine-hesitant individuals. METHODS: Social media mentions were collected using a social media listening software, Brandwatch, to examine topics and sentiments in COVID-19 hesitancy discourse during a period of September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. The results from this query included publicly available mentions on two popular social media sites, Twitter and Reddit. The dataset of 14,901 global, English language messages were analyzed using a computer-assisted process in SAS text-mining and Brandwatch software. The data revealed eight unique topics before being analyzed by sentiment. RESULTS: Among the COVID-19 hesitancy data, trust-related topics emerged that included declining vaccine acceptance, a parallel pandemic of distrust, and a call for politicians to let the scientific process work, among others. Positive sentiment revealed interest in the sources which included healthcare professionals, doctors, and government organizations. Pfizer was found to elicit both positive and negative emotions in the vaccine-hesitancy data. The negative sentiment tended to dominate the hesitancy conversation, accelerating once vaccines hit the market. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant topics were identified to help support targeted communication, strategically accelerate vaccine acceptance, and mitigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the public. Strategic methods of online and offline messaging tactics are suggested to reach diverse, malleable populations of interest. Topics of personal anecdotes of safety, effectiveness, and recommendations among families are identified as persuasive communication opportunities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99894412023-03-08 COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis Sussman, Kristen L. Bouchacourt, Lindsay Bright, Laura F. Wilcox, Gary B. Mackert, Michael Norwood, Aliza Steinberg Allport Altillo, Brandon Shaun Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Addressing gaps in COVID-19 vaccine-hesitancy research, the current study aimed to add depth and nuance to the exploratory research examining vaccine-hesitant groups. Using a larger, but more focused conversation occurring on social media, the results can be used by health communicators to frame emotionally resonant messaging to improve COVID-19 vaccine advocacy while also mitigating negative concerns for vaccine-hesitant individuals. METHODS: Social media mentions were collected using a social media listening software, Brandwatch, to examine topics and sentiments in COVID-19 hesitancy discourse during a period of September 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. The results from this query included publicly available mentions on two popular social media sites, Twitter and Reddit. The dataset of 14,901 global, English language messages were analyzed using a computer-assisted process in SAS text-mining and Brandwatch software. The data revealed eight unique topics before being analyzed by sentiment. RESULTS: Among the COVID-19 hesitancy data, trust-related topics emerged that included declining vaccine acceptance, a parallel pandemic of distrust, and a call for politicians to let the scientific process work, among others. Positive sentiment revealed interest in the sources which included healthcare professionals, doctors, and government organizations. Pfizer was found to elicit both positive and negative emotions in the vaccine-hesitancy data. The negative sentiment tended to dominate the hesitancy conversation, accelerating once vaccines hit the market. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant topics were identified to help support targeted communication, strategically accelerate vaccine acceptance, and mitigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the public. Strategic methods of online and offline messaging tactics are suggested to reach diverse, malleable populations of interest. Topics of personal anecdotes of safety, effectiveness, and recommendations among families are identified as persuasive communication opportunities. SAGE Publications 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9989441/ /pubmed/36896330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231158308 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Sussman, Kristen L.
Bouchacourt, Lindsay
Bright, Laura F.
Wilcox, Gary B.
Mackert, Michael
Norwood, Aliza Steinberg
Allport Altillo, Brandon Shaun
COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title_full COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title_fullStr COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title_short COVID-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: A social media text and sentiment analysis
title_sort covid-19 topics and emotional frames in vaccine hesitation: a social media text and sentiment analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231158308
work_keys_str_mv AT sussmankristenl covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT bouchacourtlindsay covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT brightlauraf covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT wilcoxgaryb covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT mackertmichael covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT norwoodalizasteinberg covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis
AT allportaltillobrandonshaun covid19topicsandemotionalframesinvaccinehesitationasocialmediatextandsentimentanalysis