Cargando…

Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing

BACKGROUND: Few reports have investigated the oncologically safe timing of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients with clinically normal inguinal lymph nodes (cN0), particularly those who received delayed surgical treatment. METHODS: The study included pT1aG2, pT1b-3G1-3 cN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Shanjin, Zhao, Jian, Liu, Zhiwei, Wu, Tao, Wang, Sheng, Wu, Chengwen, Pan, Lei, Jiang, Xiaoye, Guan, Zhihao, Wang, Yanjun, Jiao, Dian, Yan, Fengqi, Zhang, Keying, Tang, Qisheng, Ma, Jianjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1069284
_version_ 1784901768955559936
author Ma, Shanjin
Zhao, Jian
Liu, Zhiwei
Wu, Tao
Wang, Sheng
Wu, Chengwen
Pan, Lei
Jiang, Xiaoye
Guan, Zhihao
Wang, Yanjun
Jiao, Dian
Yan, Fengqi
Zhang, Keying
Tang, Qisheng
Ma, Jianjun
author_facet Ma, Shanjin
Zhao, Jian
Liu, Zhiwei
Wu, Tao
Wang, Sheng
Wu, Chengwen
Pan, Lei
Jiang, Xiaoye
Guan, Zhihao
Wang, Yanjun
Jiao, Dian
Yan, Fengqi
Zhang, Keying
Tang, Qisheng
Ma, Jianjun
author_sort Ma, Shanjin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few reports have investigated the oncologically safe timing of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients with clinically normal inguinal lymph nodes (cN0), particularly those who received delayed surgical treatment. METHODS: The study included pT1aG2, pT1b-3G1-3 cN0M0 patients with penile cancer who received prophylactic bilateral inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) at the Department of Urology of Tangdu Hospital between October 2002 and August 2019. Patients who received simultaneous resection of primary tumor and inguinal lymph nodes were assigned to the immediate group, while the rest were assigned to the delayed group. The optimal timing of lymphadenectomy was determined based on the time-dependent ROC curves. The disease-specific survival (DSS) was estimated based on the Kaplan–Meier curve. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between DSS and the timing of lymphadenectomy and tumor characteristics. The analyses were repeated after stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study, 35 of them in the immediate group and 52 in the delayed group. The median (range) interval time between primary tumor resection and ILND of the delayed group was 85 (29-225) days. Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that immediate lymphadenectomy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02–0.57; p = 0.009). An index of 3.5 months was determined as the optimal cut-point for dichotomization in the delayed group. In high-risk patients who received delayed surgical treatment, prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy within 3.5 months was associated with a significantly better DSS compared to dissection after 3.5months (77.8% and 0%, respectively; log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate and prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy in high-risk cN0 patients (pT1bG3 and all higher stage tumours) with penile cancer improves survival. For those patients at high risk who received delayed surgical treatment for any reason, within 3.5 months after resection of the primary tumor seems to be an oncologically safe window for prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99894492023-03-08 Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing Ma, Shanjin Zhao, Jian Liu, Zhiwei Wu, Tao Wang, Sheng Wu, Chengwen Pan, Lei Jiang, Xiaoye Guan, Zhihao Wang, Yanjun Jiao, Dian Yan, Fengqi Zhang, Keying Tang, Qisheng Ma, Jianjun Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Few reports have investigated the oncologically safe timing of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer patients with clinically normal inguinal lymph nodes (cN0), particularly those who received delayed surgical treatment. METHODS: The study included pT1aG2, pT1b-3G1-3 cN0M0 patients with penile cancer who received prophylactic bilateral inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) at the Department of Urology of Tangdu Hospital between October 2002 and August 2019. Patients who received simultaneous resection of primary tumor and inguinal lymph nodes were assigned to the immediate group, while the rest were assigned to the delayed group. The optimal timing of lymphadenectomy was determined based on the time-dependent ROC curves. The disease-specific survival (DSS) was estimated based on the Kaplan–Meier curve. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations between DSS and the timing of lymphadenectomy and tumor characteristics. The analyses were repeated after stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study, 35 of them in the immediate group and 52 in the delayed group. The median (range) interval time between primary tumor resection and ILND of the delayed group was 85 (29-225) days. Multivariable Cox analysis demonstrated that immediate lymphadenectomy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02–0.57; p = 0.009). An index of 3.5 months was determined as the optimal cut-point for dichotomization in the delayed group. In high-risk patients who received delayed surgical treatment, prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy within 3.5 months was associated with a significantly better DSS compared to dissection after 3.5months (77.8% and 0%, respectively; log-rank p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate and prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy in high-risk cN0 patients (pT1bG3 and all higher stage tumours) with penile cancer improves survival. For those patients at high risk who received delayed surgical treatment for any reason, within 3.5 months after resection of the primary tumor seems to be an oncologically safe window for prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9989449/ /pubmed/36895485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1069284 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ma, Zhao, Liu, Wu, Wang, Wu, Pan, Jiang, Guan, Wang, Jiao, Yan, Zhang, Tang and Ma https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ma, Shanjin
Zhao, Jian
Liu, Zhiwei
Wu, Tao
Wang, Sheng
Wu, Chengwen
Pan, Lei
Jiang, Xiaoye
Guan, Zhihao
Wang, Yanjun
Jiao, Dian
Yan, Fengqi
Zhang, Keying
Tang, Qisheng
Ma, Jianjun
Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title_full Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title_fullStr Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title_short Prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cN0 penile cancer: The optimal surgical timing
title_sort prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for high-risk cn0 penile cancer: the optimal surgical timing
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1069284
work_keys_str_mv AT mashanjin prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT zhaojian prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT liuzhiwei prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT wutao prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT wangsheng prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT wuchengwen prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT panlei prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT jiangxiaoye prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT guanzhihao prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT wangyanjun prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT jiaodian prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT yanfengqi prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT zhangkeying prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT tangqisheng prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming
AT majianjun prophylacticinguinallymphadenectomyforhighriskcn0penilecancertheoptimalsurgicaltiming