Cargando…

Self-Managed Abortion in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide up-to-date information about self-managed abortion in the USA. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence indicates that there is growing demand for self-managed abortion in the USA as obstacles to facility-based care increase, especially since the Supreme Court overtur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Nisha, Grossman, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37305376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x
_version_ 1784901796507942912
author Verma, Nisha
Grossman, Daniel
author_facet Verma, Nisha
Grossman, Daniel
author_sort Verma, Nisha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide up-to-date information about self-managed abortion in the USA. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence indicates that there is growing demand for self-managed abortion in the USA as obstacles to facility-based care increase, especially since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Self-managed abortion with medications is safe and effective. SUMMARY: Based on a nationally representative survey, the lifetime prevalence of self-managed abortion in the USA in 2017 was estimated to be 7%. People experiencing barriers to abortion care, including people of color, people with lower incomes, people in states that have restrictive abortion laws, and those living farther from facilities providing abortion care are more likely to attempt self-managed abortion. While people may use a range of methods to self-manage abortion, there is growing use of safe and effective medications, including mifepristone used together with misoprostol and misoprostol used alone; use of traumatic and dangerous methods is rare. While many people attempt to self-manage their abortion because of barriers to facility-based care, others have a preference for self-care because it is convenient, accessible, and private. While the medical risks of self-managed abortion may be few, the legal risks may be significant. Sixty-one people have been criminally investigated or arrested between 2000 and 2020 for allegedly self-managing their abortion or helping someone else do so. Clinicians play an important role in providing evidence-based information and care to patients considering or attempting self-managed abortion, as well as minimizing legal risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99895742023-03-07 Self-Managed Abortion in the United States Verma, Nisha Grossman, Daniel Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep Review PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide up-to-date information about self-managed abortion in the USA. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence indicates that there is growing demand for self-managed abortion in the USA as obstacles to facility-based care increase, especially since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Self-managed abortion with medications is safe and effective. SUMMARY: Based on a nationally representative survey, the lifetime prevalence of self-managed abortion in the USA in 2017 was estimated to be 7%. People experiencing barriers to abortion care, including people of color, people with lower incomes, people in states that have restrictive abortion laws, and those living farther from facilities providing abortion care are more likely to attempt self-managed abortion. While people may use a range of methods to self-manage abortion, there is growing use of safe and effective medications, including mifepristone used together with misoprostol and misoprostol used alone; use of traumatic and dangerous methods is rare. While many people attempt to self-manage their abortion because of barriers to facility-based care, others have a preference for self-care because it is convenient, accessible, and private. While the medical risks of self-managed abortion may be few, the legal risks may be significant. Sixty-one people have been criminally investigated or arrested between 2000 and 2020 for allegedly self-managing their abortion or helping someone else do so. Clinicians play an important role in providing evidence-based information and care to patients considering or attempting self-managed abortion, as well as minimizing legal risks. Springer US 2023-03-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9989574/ /pubmed/37305376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review
Verma, Nisha
Grossman, Daniel
Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title_full Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title_fullStr Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title_short Self-Managed Abortion in the United States
title_sort self-managed abortion in the united states
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37305376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13669-023-00354-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vermanisha selfmanagedabortionintheunitedstates
AT grossmandaniel selfmanagedabortionintheunitedstates