Cargando…
Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have rapidly evolved from chemotherapy, to the first in class ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895924 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-656 |
_version_ | 1784901829766676480 |
---|---|
author | Chazan, Grace Solomon, Benjamin J. |
author_facet | Chazan, Grace Solomon, Benjamin J. |
author_sort | Chazan, Grace |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have rapidly evolved from chemotherapy, to the first in class ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib in 2011, and now include no fewer than five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ALK inhibitors. However, while superiority to crizotinib has been established, head-to-head clinical trials comparing newer generation ALK inhibitors are lacking, and decisions on optimal first-line treatment must be based on analysis of the relevant trials, with attention to systemic and intracranial efficacy, toxicity profile as well as consideration of patient factors and preferences. Here we aim to synthesise findings from review of these trials and to describe options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC. METHODS: A literature review of relevant randomised clinical trials was undertaken using Embase database. There were no limitations to time frame or language applied. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Crizotinib was established as the standard of care first-line treatment for patients with ALK+ aNSCLC in 2011. Since this time, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib have all demonstrated superiority as first-line treatments compared to crizotinib, based on progression free survival, intra-cranial efficacy, and side-effect profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC include alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. This review serves as a resource summarizing data from key clinical trials with ALK inhibitors to aid in decision making when tailoring treatment for patients. Future research in the field includes real world analysis of efficacy and toxicity of next-generation ALK-inhibitors, identification of mechanisms of tumor persistence and acquired resistance, development of novel ALK inhibitors, and use of ALK-TKIs in earlier stage disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9989801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99898012023-03-08 Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review Chazan, Grace Solomon, Benjamin J. Transl Lung Cancer Res Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have rapidly evolved from chemotherapy, to the first in class ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib in 2011, and now include no fewer than five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ALK inhibitors. However, while superiority to crizotinib has been established, head-to-head clinical trials comparing newer generation ALK inhibitors are lacking, and decisions on optimal first-line treatment must be based on analysis of the relevant trials, with attention to systemic and intracranial efficacy, toxicity profile as well as consideration of patient factors and preferences. Here we aim to synthesise findings from review of these trials and to describe options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC. METHODS: A literature review of relevant randomised clinical trials was undertaken using Embase database. There were no limitations to time frame or language applied. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Crizotinib was established as the standard of care first-line treatment for patients with ALK+ aNSCLC in 2011. Since this time, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib have all demonstrated superiority as first-line treatments compared to crizotinib, based on progression free survival, intra-cranial efficacy, and side-effect profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC include alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. This review serves as a resource summarizing data from key clinical trials with ALK inhibitors to aid in decision making when tailoring treatment for patients. Future research in the field includes real world analysis of efficacy and toxicity of next-generation ALK-inhibitors, identification of mechanisms of tumor persistence and acquired resistance, development of novel ALK inhibitors, and use of ALK-TKIs in earlier stage disease. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-25 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9989801/ /pubmed/36895924 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-656 Text en 2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chazan, Grace Solomon, Benjamin J. Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title | Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title_full | Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title_short | Optimal first-line treatment for metastatic ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
title_sort | optimal first-line treatment for metastatic alk+ non-small cell lung cancer—a narrative review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895924 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chazangrace optimalfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticalknonsmallcelllungcanceranarrativereview AT solomonbenjaminj optimalfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticalknonsmallcelllungcanceranarrativereview |