Cargando…

Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer seen in rural and underserved areas disproportionately face barriers to access genetic services. Genetic testing is critical to inform treatment decisions, for early detection of another cancer, and to identify at-risk family members who may benefit from screening an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Lauren G., Buzdnitskaya, Tatyana, Rolf, Bradley A., Souza, William, Sienko, Mark, Ruiz-Bonilla, Jose Alberto, Shah, Binay, Jewell, Patrick, Jensen, Lindsay, Horike-Pyne, Martha, Elrod, Jo Ann, Crews, Jennie, Laurino, Mercy, Weeks, Kevin Austin, Dubard-Gault, Marianne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36877518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1723
_version_ 1784901847131095040
author Santos, Lauren G.
Buzdnitskaya, Tatyana
Rolf, Bradley A.
Souza, William
Sienko, Mark
Ruiz-Bonilla, Jose Alberto
Shah, Binay
Jewell, Patrick
Jensen, Lindsay
Horike-Pyne, Martha
Elrod, Jo Ann
Crews, Jennie
Laurino, Mercy
Weeks, Kevin Austin
Dubard-Gault, Marianne E.
author_facet Santos, Lauren G.
Buzdnitskaya, Tatyana
Rolf, Bradley A.
Souza, William
Sienko, Mark
Ruiz-Bonilla, Jose Alberto
Shah, Binay
Jewell, Patrick
Jensen, Lindsay
Horike-Pyne, Martha
Elrod, Jo Ann
Crews, Jennie
Laurino, Mercy
Weeks, Kevin Austin
Dubard-Gault, Marianne E.
author_sort Santos, Lauren G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer seen in rural and underserved areas disproportionately face barriers to access genetic services. Genetic testing is critical to inform treatment decisions, for early detection of another cancer, and to identify at-risk family members who may benefit from screening and prevention. OBJECTIVE: To examine medical oncologists’ genetic testing ordering trends for patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective quality improvement study was performed in 2 phases over 6 months between August 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021, at a community network hospital. Phase 1 focused on observation of clinic processes. Phase 2 incorporated peer coaching from cancer genetics experts for medical oncologists at the community network hospital. The follow-up period lasted 9 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of genetic tests ordered was compared between phases. RESULTS: The study included 634 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.0 [10.8] years [range, 39-90 years]; 409 women [64.5%]; 585 White [92.3%]); 353 (55.7%) had breast cancer, 184 (29.0%) had prostate cancer, and 218 (34.4%) had a family history of cancer. Of the 634 patients with cancer, 29 of 415 (7.0%) received genetic testing in phase 1, and 25 of 219 (11.4%) received genetic testing in phase 2. Of the 29 patients who received testing in phase 1, 20 (69.0%) had germline genetic testing; 23 of 25 patients (92.0%) had germline genetic testing in phase 2. Uptake of germline genetic testing increased by 23.0% between phases, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06). Uptake of germline genetic testing was highest among patients with pancreatic cancer (4 of 19 [21.1%]) and ovarian cancer (6 of 35 [17.1%]); the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends offering genetic testing to all patients with pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that peer coaching from cancer genetics experts was associated with an increase in ordering of genetic testing by medical oncologists. Efforts made to (1) standardize gathering of personal and family history of cancer, (2) review biomarker data suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome, (3) facilitate ordering tumor and/or germline genetic testing every time NCCN criteria are met, (4) encourage data sharing between institutions, and (5) advocate for universal coverage for genetic testing may help realize the benefits associated with precision oncology for patients and their families seeking care at community cancer centers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9989894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99898942023-03-08 Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital Santos, Lauren G. Buzdnitskaya, Tatyana Rolf, Bradley A. Souza, William Sienko, Mark Ruiz-Bonilla, Jose Alberto Shah, Binay Jewell, Patrick Jensen, Lindsay Horike-Pyne, Martha Elrod, Jo Ann Crews, Jennie Laurino, Mercy Weeks, Kevin Austin Dubard-Gault, Marianne E. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer seen in rural and underserved areas disproportionately face barriers to access genetic services. Genetic testing is critical to inform treatment decisions, for early detection of another cancer, and to identify at-risk family members who may benefit from screening and prevention. OBJECTIVE: To examine medical oncologists’ genetic testing ordering trends for patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective quality improvement study was performed in 2 phases over 6 months between August 1, 2020, and January 31, 2021, at a community network hospital. Phase 1 focused on observation of clinic processes. Phase 2 incorporated peer coaching from cancer genetics experts for medical oncologists at the community network hospital. The follow-up period lasted 9 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of genetic tests ordered was compared between phases. RESULTS: The study included 634 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.0 [10.8] years [range, 39-90 years]; 409 women [64.5%]; 585 White [92.3%]); 353 (55.7%) had breast cancer, 184 (29.0%) had prostate cancer, and 218 (34.4%) had a family history of cancer. Of the 634 patients with cancer, 29 of 415 (7.0%) received genetic testing in phase 1, and 25 of 219 (11.4%) received genetic testing in phase 2. Of the 29 patients who received testing in phase 1, 20 (69.0%) had germline genetic testing; 23 of 25 patients (92.0%) had germline genetic testing in phase 2. Uptake of germline genetic testing increased by 23.0% between phases, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06). Uptake of germline genetic testing was highest among patients with pancreatic cancer (4 of 19 [21.1%]) and ovarian cancer (6 of 35 [17.1%]); the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends offering genetic testing to all patients with pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that peer coaching from cancer genetics experts was associated with an increase in ordering of genetic testing by medical oncologists. Efforts made to (1) standardize gathering of personal and family history of cancer, (2) review biomarker data suggestive of a hereditary cancer syndrome, (3) facilitate ordering tumor and/or germline genetic testing every time NCCN criteria are met, (4) encourage data sharing between institutions, and (5) advocate for universal coverage for genetic testing may help realize the benefits associated with precision oncology for patients and their families seeking care at community cancer centers. American Medical Association 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9989894/ /pubmed/36877518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1723 Text en Copyright 2023 Santos LG et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Santos, Lauren G.
Buzdnitskaya, Tatyana
Rolf, Bradley A.
Souza, William
Sienko, Mark
Ruiz-Bonilla, Jose Alberto
Shah, Binay
Jewell, Patrick
Jensen, Lindsay
Horike-Pyne, Martha
Elrod, Jo Ann
Crews, Jennie
Laurino, Mercy
Weeks, Kevin Austin
Dubard-Gault, Marianne E.
Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title_full Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title_fullStr Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title_short Assessment of a Peer Physician Coaching Partnership Between a Designated Cancer Center Genetics Service and a Community Cancer Network Hospital
title_sort assessment of a peer physician coaching partnership between a designated cancer center genetics service and a community cancer network hospital
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9989894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36877518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1723
work_keys_str_mv AT santoslaureng assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT buzdnitskayatatyana assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT rolfbradleya assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT souzawilliam assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT sienkomark assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT ruizbonillajosealberto assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT shahbinay assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT jewellpatrick assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT jensenlindsay assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT horikepynemartha assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT elrodjoann assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT crewsjennie assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT laurinomercy assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT weekskevinaustin assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital
AT dubardgaultmariannee assessmentofapeerphysiciancoachingpartnershipbetweenadesignatedcancercentergeneticsserviceandacommunitycancernetworkhospital