Cargando…

Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction

[Image: see text] Proteomics and metabolomics are essential in systems biology, and simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid–liquid extraction (SPM-LLE) allows isolation of the metabolome and proteome from the same sample. Since the proteome is present as a pellet in SPM-LLE, it must be solubilized for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Pijkeren, Alienke, Egger, Anna-Sophia, Hotze, Madlen, Zimmermann, Elisabeth, Kipura, Tobias, Grander, Julia, Gollowitzer, André, Koeberle, Andreas, Bischoff, Rainer, Thedieck, Kathrin, Kwiatkowski, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00758
_version_ 1784901877714911232
author van Pijkeren, Alienke
Egger, Anna-Sophia
Hotze, Madlen
Zimmermann, Elisabeth
Kipura, Tobias
Grander, Julia
Gollowitzer, André
Koeberle, Andreas
Bischoff, Rainer
Thedieck, Kathrin
Kwiatkowski, Marcel
author_facet van Pijkeren, Alienke
Egger, Anna-Sophia
Hotze, Madlen
Zimmermann, Elisabeth
Kipura, Tobias
Grander, Julia
Gollowitzer, André
Koeberle, Andreas
Bischoff, Rainer
Thedieck, Kathrin
Kwiatkowski, Marcel
author_sort van Pijkeren, Alienke
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Proteomics and metabolomics are essential in systems biology, and simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid–liquid extraction (SPM-LLE) allows isolation of the metabolome and proteome from the same sample. Since the proteome is present as a pellet in SPM-LLE, it must be solubilized for quantitative proteomics. Solubilization and proteome extraction are critical factors in the information obtained at the proteome level. In this study, we investigated the performance of two surfactants (sodium deoxycholate (SDC), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) and urea in terms of proteome coverage and extraction efficiency of an interphase proteome pellet generated by methanol–chloroform based SPM-LLE. We also investigated how the performance differs when the proteome is extracted from the interphase pellet or by direct cell lysis. We quantified 12 lipids covering triglycerides and various phospholipid classes, and 25 polar metabolites covering central energy metabolism in chloroform and methanol extracts. Our study reveals that the proteome coverages between the two surfactants and urea for the SPM-LLE interphase pellet were similar, but the extraction efficiencies differed significantly. While SDS led to enrichment of basic proteins, which were mainly ribosomal and ribonuclear proteins, urea was the most efficient extraction agent for simultaneous proteo-metabolome analysis. The results of our study also show that the performance of surfactants for quantitative proteomics is better when the proteome is extracted through direct cell lysis rather than an interphase pellet. In contrast, the performance of urea for quantitative proteomics was significantly better when the proteome was extracted from an interphase pellet than by direct cell lysis. We demonstrated that urea is superior to surfactants for proteome extraction from SPM-LLE interphase pellets, with a particularly good performance for the extraction of proteins associated with metabolic pathways. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027338.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9990123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99901232023-03-08 Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction van Pijkeren, Alienke Egger, Anna-Sophia Hotze, Madlen Zimmermann, Elisabeth Kipura, Tobias Grander, Julia Gollowitzer, André Koeberle, Andreas Bischoff, Rainer Thedieck, Kathrin Kwiatkowski, Marcel J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Proteomics and metabolomics are essential in systems biology, and simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid–liquid extraction (SPM-LLE) allows isolation of the metabolome and proteome from the same sample. Since the proteome is present as a pellet in SPM-LLE, it must be solubilized for quantitative proteomics. Solubilization and proteome extraction are critical factors in the information obtained at the proteome level. In this study, we investigated the performance of two surfactants (sodium deoxycholate (SDC), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) and urea in terms of proteome coverage and extraction efficiency of an interphase proteome pellet generated by methanol–chloroform based SPM-LLE. We also investigated how the performance differs when the proteome is extracted from the interphase pellet or by direct cell lysis. We quantified 12 lipids covering triglycerides and various phospholipid classes, and 25 polar metabolites covering central energy metabolism in chloroform and methanol extracts. Our study reveals that the proteome coverages between the two surfactants and urea for the SPM-LLE interphase pellet were similar, but the extraction efficiencies differed significantly. While SDS led to enrichment of basic proteins, which were mainly ribosomal and ribonuclear proteins, urea was the most efficient extraction agent for simultaneous proteo-metabolome analysis. The results of our study also show that the performance of surfactants for quantitative proteomics is better when the proteome is extracted through direct cell lysis rather than an interphase pellet. In contrast, the performance of urea for quantitative proteomics was significantly better when the proteome was extracted from an interphase pellet than by direct cell lysis. We demonstrated that urea is superior to surfactants for proteome extraction from SPM-LLE interphase pellets, with a particularly good performance for the extraction of proteins associated with metabolic pathways. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD027338. American Chemical Society 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9990123/ /pubmed/36763818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00758 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle van Pijkeren, Alienke
Egger, Anna-Sophia
Hotze, Madlen
Zimmermann, Elisabeth
Kipura, Tobias
Grander, Julia
Gollowitzer, André
Koeberle, Andreas
Bischoff, Rainer
Thedieck, Kathrin
Kwiatkowski, Marcel
Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title_full Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title_fullStr Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title_full_unstemmed Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title_short Proteome Coverage after Simultaneous Proteo-Metabolome Liquid–Liquid Extraction
title_sort proteome coverage after simultaneous proteo-metabolome liquid–liquid extraction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00758
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpijkerenalienke proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT eggerannasophia proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT hotzemadlen proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT zimmermannelisabeth proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT kipuratobias proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT granderjulia proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT gollowitzerandre proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT koeberleandreas proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT bischoffrainer proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT thedieckkathrin proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction
AT kwiatkowskimarcel proteomecoverageaftersimultaneousproteometabolomeliquidliquidextraction