Cargando…

Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: Haemophilia A is a bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) which leads to severe and repeated bleedings. There is a need to understand the optimal treatment pathway for FVIII inhibitors with the use of immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the role of hae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, George, Back, Emily, Rosa, Doug, O’Hara, Jamie, Finnegan, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02654-0
_version_ 1784901887880855552
author Morgan, George
Back, Emily
Rosa, Doug
O’Hara, Jamie
Finnegan, Alan
author_facet Morgan, George
Back, Emily
Rosa, Doug
O’Hara, Jamie
Finnegan, Alan
author_sort Morgan, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Haemophilia A is a bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) which leads to severe and repeated bleedings. There is a need to understand the optimal treatment pathway for FVIII inhibitors with the use of immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the role of haemostatic ‘bypassing’ agents (BPA) on-demand (OD) or prophylactically (Px). The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the real-world use of BPA therapy administered prophylactically or on-demand concomitant with ITI, for the treatment of an inhibitor to FVIII replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: Retrospective observational data were used to capture disease management information for patients who were aged 16 or under and had received ITI and BPA treatment for their most recent inhibitor from Jan-2015 to Jan-2019, for 47 patients in the UK and Germany. Descriptive comparisons of the clinical effectiveness and resource utilisation of Px and OD BPA therapy during ITI were conducted. RESULTS: During ITI and BPA treatment, for an inhibitor, bleeding events averaged 1.5 and 1.2 for Px and OD treatment respectively. Compared to only BPA therapy we see 3.4 and 1.4 bleeding events for Px and OD respectively during an inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Baseline disease characteristics differed between BPA therapy cohorts and this resulted in higher clinical effectiveness of ITI treatment alongside BPA Px than BPA OD during an inhibitor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9990186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99901862023-03-08 Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review Morgan, George Back, Emily Rosa, Doug O’Hara, Jamie Finnegan, Alan Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Haemophilia A is a bleeding disorder caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) which leads to severe and repeated bleedings. There is a need to understand the optimal treatment pathway for FVIII inhibitors with the use of immune tolerance induction (ITI) and the role of haemostatic ‘bypassing’ agents (BPA) on-demand (OD) or prophylactically (Px). The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the real-world use of BPA therapy administered prophylactically or on-demand concomitant with ITI, for the treatment of an inhibitor to FVIII replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. METHODS: Retrospective observational data were used to capture disease management information for patients who were aged 16 or under and had received ITI and BPA treatment for their most recent inhibitor from Jan-2015 to Jan-2019, for 47 patients in the UK and Germany. Descriptive comparisons of the clinical effectiveness and resource utilisation of Px and OD BPA therapy during ITI were conducted. RESULTS: During ITI and BPA treatment, for an inhibitor, bleeding events averaged 1.5 and 1.2 for Px and OD treatment respectively. Compared to only BPA therapy we see 3.4 and 1.4 bleeding events for Px and OD respectively during an inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Baseline disease characteristics differed between BPA therapy cohorts and this resulted in higher clinical effectiveness of ITI treatment alongside BPA Px than BPA OD during an inhibitor. BioMed Central 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9990186/ /pubmed/36882773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02654-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Morgan, George
Back, Emily
Rosa, Doug
O’Hara, Jamie
Finnegan, Alan
Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title_full Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title_fullStr Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title_short Assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
title_sort assessing the value of bypassing agent therapy used prophylactic versus on-demand, during immune tolerance induction for treatment of inhibitors: a retrospective chart review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02654-0
work_keys_str_mv AT morgangeorge assessingthevalueofbypassingagenttherapyusedprophylacticversusondemandduringimmunetoleranceinductionfortreatmentofinhibitorsaretrospectivechartreview
AT backemily assessingthevalueofbypassingagenttherapyusedprophylacticversusondemandduringimmunetoleranceinductionfortreatmentofinhibitorsaretrospectivechartreview
AT rosadoug assessingthevalueofbypassingagenttherapyusedprophylacticversusondemandduringimmunetoleranceinductionfortreatmentofinhibitorsaretrospectivechartreview
AT oharajamie assessingthevalueofbypassingagenttherapyusedprophylacticversusondemandduringimmunetoleranceinductionfortreatmentofinhibitorsaretrospectivechartreview
AT finneganalan assessingthevalueofbypassingagenttherapyusedprophylacticversusondemandduringimmunetoleranceinductionfortreatmentofinhibitorsaretrospectivechartreview