Cargando…
Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers
BACKGROUND: The 21(st) Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z |
_version_ | 1784901917691871232 |
---|---|
author | Brooks, Joanna Veazey Zegers, Carli Sinclair, Christian T. Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth Thimmesch, Amanda R. English, Daniel Nelson-Brantley, Heather V. |
author_facet | Brooks, Joanna Veazey Zegers, Carli Sinclair, Christian T. Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth Thimmesch, Amanda R. English, Daniel Nelson-Brantley, Heather V. |
author_sort | Brooks, Joanna Veazey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 21(st) Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy within cancer care. METHODS: We conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study to understand patient and clinician reactions to the Information Blocking Rule in cancer care and what they would like policy makers to consider. Twenty-nine patients and 29 clinicians completed interviews and surveys. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Interview and survey data were analyzed separately, then linked to generate a full interpretation of the results. RESULTS: Overall, patients felt more positive about the policy than clinicians. Patients wanted policy makers to understand that patients are unique, and they want to individualize their preferences for receiving health information with their clinicians. Clinicians highlighted the uniqueness of cancer care, due to the highly sensitive information that is shared. Both patients and clinicians were concerned about the impact on clinician workload and stress. Both expressed an urgent need for tailoring implementation of the policy to avoid unintended harm and distress for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this policy in cancer care. Dissemination strategies to better inform the public about the policy and improve clinician understanding and support are recommended. Patients who have serious illness or diagnoses such as cancer and their clinicians should be included when developing and enacting policies that could have a significant impact on their well-being. Patients with cancer and their cancer care teams want the ability to tailor information release based on individual preferences and goals. Understanding how to tailor implementation of the Information Blocking Rule is essential for retaining its benefits and minimizing unintended harm for patients with cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9990332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99903322023-03-08 Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers Brooks, Joanna Veazey Zegers, Carli Sinclair, Christian T. Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth Thimmesch, Amanda R. English, Daniel Nelson-Brantley, Heather V. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The 21(st) Century Cures Act Interoperability and Information Blocking Rule was created to increase patient access to health information. This federally mandated policy has been met with praise and concern. However, little is known about patient and clinician opinions of this policy within cancer care. METHODS: We conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods study to understand patient and clinician reactions to the Information Blocking Rule in cancer care and what they would like policy makers to consider. Twenty-nine patients and 29 clinicians completed interviews and surveys. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Interview and survey data were analyzed separately, then linked to generate a full interpretation of the results. RESULTS: Overall, patients felt more positive about the policy than clinicians. Patients wanted policy makers to understand that patients are unique, and they want to individualize their preferences for receiving health information with their clinicians. Clinicians highlighted the uniqueness of cancer care, due to the highly sensitive information that is shared. Both patients and clinicians were concerned about the impact on clinician workload and stress. Both expressed an urgent need for tailoring implementation of the policy to avoid unintended harm and distress for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide suggestions for optimizing the implementation of this policy in cancer care. Dissemination strategies to better inform the public about the policy and improve clinician understanding and support are recommended. Patients who have serious illness or diagnoses such as cancer and their clinicians should be included when developing and enacting policies that could have a significant impact on their well-being. Patients with cancer and their cancer care teams want the ability to tailor information release based on individual preferences and goals. Understanding how to tailor implementation of the Information Blocking Rule is essential for retaining its benefits and minimizing unintended harm for patients with cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z. BioMed Central 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9990332/ /pubmed/36879318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Brooks, Joanna Veazey Zegers, Carli Sinclair, Christian T. Wulff-Burchfield, Elizabeth Thimmesch, Amanda R. English, Daniel Nelson-Brantley, Heather V. Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title | Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title_full | Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title_fullStr | Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title_short | Understanding the Cures Act Information Blocking Rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
title_sort | understanding the cures act information blocking rule in cancer care: a mixed methods exploration of patient and clinician perspectives and recommendations for policy makers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36879318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09230-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brooksjoannaveazey understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT zegerscarli understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT sinclairchristiant understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT wulffburchfieldelizabeth understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT thimmeschamandar understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT englishdaniel understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers AT nelsonbrantleyheatherv understandingthecuresactinformationblockingruleincancercareamixedmethodsexplorationofpatientandclinicianperspectivesandrecommendationsforpolicymakers |