Cargando…

Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES: The number of indicators used to monitor and improve the quality of care is debatable and may influence professionals’ joy in work. We aimed to assess intensive care unit (ICU) professionals’ perceived burden of documenting quality indicator data and its association with joy in work. DES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hesselink, Gijs, Verhage, Rutger, Hoiting, Oscar, Verweij, Eva, Janssen, Inge, Westerhof, Brigitte, Ambaum, Gilian, van der Horst, Iwan C C, de Jong, Paul, Postma, Nynke, van der Hoeven, Johannes G, Zegers, Marieke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36878656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062939
_version_ 1784901969483137024
author Hesselink, Gijs
Verhage, Rutger
Hoiting, Oscar
Verweij, Eva
Janssen, Inge
Westerhof, Brigitte
Ambaum, Gilian
van der Horst, Iwan C C
de Jong, Paul
Postma, Nynke
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Zegers, Marieke
author_facet Hesselink, Gijs
Verhage, Rutger
Hoiting, Oscar
Verweij, Eva
Janssen, Inge
Westerhof, Brigitte
Ambaum, Gilian
van der Horst, Iwan C C
de Jong, Paul
Postma, Nynke
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Zegers, Marieke
author_sort Hesselink, Gijs
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The number of indicators used to monitor and improve the quality of care is debatable and may influence professionals’ joy in work. We aimed to assess intensive care unit (ICU) professionals’ perceived burden of documenting quality indicator data and its association with joy in work. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: ICUs of eight hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals (ie, medical specialists, residents and nurses) working in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS: The survey included reported time spent on documenting quality indicator data and validated measures for documentation burden (ie, such documentation being unreasonable and unnecessary) and elements of joy in work (ie, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, autonomy, relatedness and competence). Multivariable regression analysis was performed for each element of joy in work as a separate outcome. RESULTS: In total, 448 ICU professionals responded to the survey (65% response rate). The overall median time spent on documenting quality data per working day is 60 min (IQR 30–90). Nurses spend more time documenting these data than physicians (medians of 60 min vs 35 min, p<0.01). Most professionals (n=259, 66%) often perceive such documentation tasks as unnecessary and a minority (n=71, 18%) perceive them as unreasonable. No associations between documentation burden and measures of joy in work were found, except for the negative association between unnecessary documentations and sense of autonomy (β=−0.11, 95% CI −0.21 to −0.01, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Dutch ICU professionals spend substantial time on documenting quality indicator data they often regard as unnecessary. Despite the lacking necessity, documentation burden had limited impact on joy in work. Future research should focus on which aspects of work are affected by documentation burden and whether diminishing the burden improves joy in work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9990602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99906022023-03-08 Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey Hesselink, Gijs Verhage, Rutger Hoiting, Oscar Verweij, Eva Janssen, Inge Westerhof, Brigitte Ambaum, Gilian van der Horst, Iwan C C de Jong, Paul Postma, Nynke van der Hoeven, Johannes G Zegers, Marieke BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVES: The number of indicators used to monitor and improve the quality of care is debatable and may influence professionals’ joy in work. We aimed to assess intensive care unit (ICU) professionals’ perceived burden of documenting quality indicator data and its association with joy in work. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: ICUs of eight hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals (ie, medical specialists, residents and nurses) working in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS: The survey included reported time spent on documenting quality indicator data and validated measures for documentation burden (ie, such documentation being unreasonable and unnecessary) and elements of joy in work (ie, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, autonomy, relatedness and competence). Multivariable regression analysis was performed for each element of joy in work as a separate outcome. RESULTS: In total, 448 ICU professionals responded to the survey (65% response rate). The overall median time spent on documenting quality data per working day is 60 min (IQR 30–90). Nurses spend more time documenting these data than physicians (medians of 60 min vs 35 min, p<0.01). Most professionals (n=259, 66%) often perceive such documentation tasks as unnecessary and a minority (n=71, 18%) perceive them as unreasonable. No associations between documentation burden and measures of joy in work were found, except for the negative association between unnecessary documentations and sense of autonomy (β=−0.11, 95% CI −0.21 to −0.01, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Dutch ICU professionals spend substantial time on documenting quality indicator data they often regard as unnecessary. Despite the lacking necessity, documentation burden had limited impact on joy in work. Future research should focus on which aspects of work are affected by documentation burden and whether diminishing the burden improves joy in work. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9990602/ /pubmed/36878656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062939 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Hesselink, Gijs
Verhage, Rutger
Hoiting, Oscar
Verweij, Eva
Janssen, Inge
Westerhof, Brigitte
Ambaum, Gilian
van der Horst, Iwan C C
de Jong, Paul
Postma, Nynke
van der Hoeven, Johannes G
Zegers, Marieke
Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title_full Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title_short Time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the Netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
title_sort time spent on documenting quality indicator data and associations between the perceived burden of documenting these data and joy in work among professionals in intensive care units in the netherlands: a multicentre cross-sectional survey
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36878656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062939
work_keys_str_mv AT hesselinkgijs timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT verhagerutger timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT hoitingoscar timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT verweijeva timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT jansseninge timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT westerhofbrigitte timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT ambaumgilian timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT vanderhorstiwancc timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT dejongpaul timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT postmanynke timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT vanderhoevenjohannesg timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey
AT zegersmarieke timespentondocumentingqualityindicatordataandassociationsbetweentheperceivedburdenofdocumentingthesedataandjoyinworkamongprofessionalsinintensivecareunitsinthenetherlandsamulticentrecrosssectionalsurvey