Cargando…
Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Attachment to a primary care provider is an important component of primary care as it facilitates access. In Québec, Canada, attachment to a family physician is a concern. To address unattached patients’ barriers to accessing primary care, the Ministry of Health and Social Services man...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956 |
_version_ | 1784901979028324352 |
---|---|
author | Breton, Mylaine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Catherine Deslauriers, Véronique Laberge, Maude Arsenault, Josée Gaboury, Isabelle Beauséjour, Marie Pomey, Marie-Pascale Motulsky, Aude Talbot, Annie St-Yves, Annie Smithman, Mélanie Ann Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia Sauvé, Carine Abou Malham, Sabina |
author_facet | Breton, Mylaine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Catherine Deslauriers, Véronique Laberge, Maude Arsenault, Josée Gaboury, Isabelle Beauséjour, Marie Pomey, Marie-Pascale Motulsky, Aude Talbot, Annie St-Yves, Annie Smithman, Mélanie Ann Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia Sauvé, Carine Abou Malham, Sabina |
author_sort | Breton, Mylaine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Attachment to a primary care provider is an important component of primary care as it facilitates access. In Québec, Canada, attachment to a family physician is a concern. To address unattached patients’ barriers to accessing primary care, the Ministry of Health and Social Services mandated Québec’s 18 administrative regions to implement single points of access for unattached patients (Guichets d’accès première ligne (GAPs)) that aim to better orient patients towards the most appropriate services to meet their needs. The objectives of this study are to (1) analyse the implementation of GAPs, (2) measure the effects of GAPs on performance indicators and (3) assess unattached patients’ experiences of navigation, access and service utilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal mixed-methods case study design will be conducted. Objective 1. Implementation will be analysed through semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, observations of key meetings and document analysis. Objective 2. GAP effects on indicators will be measured using performance dashboards produced using clinical and administrative data. Objective 3. Unattached patients’ experiences will be assessed using a self-administered electronic questionnaire. Findings for each case will be interpreted and presented using a joint display, a visual tool for integrating qualitative and quantitative data. Intercase analyses will be conducted highlighting the similarities and differences across cases. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (# 475314) and the Fonds de Soutien à l’innovation en santé et en services sociaux (# 5-2-01) and was approved by the CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre Ethics Committee (MP-04-2023-716). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9990645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99906452023-03-08 Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol Breton, Mylaine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Catherine Deslauriers, Véronique Laberge, Maude Arsenault, Josée Gaboury, Isabelle Beauséjour, Marie Pomey, Marie-Pascale Motulsky, Aude Talbot, Annie St-Yves, Annie Smithman, Mélanie Ann Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia Sauvé, Carine Abou Malham, Sabina BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Attachment to a primary care provider is an important component of primary care as it facilitates access. In Québec, Canada, attachment to a family physician is a concern. To address unattached patients’ barriers to accessing primary care, the Ministry of Health and Social Services mandated Québec’s 18 administrative regions to implement single points of access for unattached patients (Guichets d’accès première ligne (GAPs)) that aim to better orient patients towards the most appropriate services to meet their needs. The objectives of this study are to (1) analyse the implementation of GAPs, (2) measure the effects of GAPs on performance indicators and (3) assess unattached patients’ experiences of navigation, access and service utilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A longitudinal mixed-methods case study design will be conducted. Objective 1. Implementation will be analysed through semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, observations of key meetings and document analysis. Objective 2. GAP effects on indicators will be measured using performance dashboards produced using clinical and administrative data. Objective 3. Unattached patients’ experiences will be assessed using a self-administered electronic questionnaire. Findings for each case will be interpreted and presented using a joint display, a visual tool for integrating qualitative and quantitative data. Intercase analyses will be conducted highlighting the similarities and differences across cases. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (# 475314) and the Fonds de Soutien à l’innovation en santé et en services sociaux (# 5-2-01) and was approved by the CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre Ethics Committee (MP-04-2023-716). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9990645/ /pubmed/36868603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Breton, Mylaine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Catherine Deslauriers, Véronique Laberge, Maude Arsenault, Josée Gaboury, Isabelle Beauséjour, Marie Pomey, Marie-Pascale Motulsky, Aude Talbot, Annie St-Yves, Annie Smithman, Mélanie Ann Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia Sauvé, Carine Abou Malham, Sabina Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title | Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title_full | Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title_short | Evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
title_sort | evaluation of the implementation of single points of access for unattached patients in primary care and their effects: a study protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9990645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bretonmylaine evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT lamoureuxlamarchecatherine evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT deslauriersveronique evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT labergemaude evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT arsenaultjosee evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT gabouryisabelle evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT beausejourmarie evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT pomeymariepascale evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT motulskyaude evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT talbotannie evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT styvesannie evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT smithmanmelanieann evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT devillestoetzelnadia evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT sauvecarine evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol AT aboumalhamsabina evaluationoftheimplementationofsinglepointsofaccessforunattachedpatientsinprimarycareandtheireffectsastudyprotocol |