Cargando…

A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforation is arguably the most feared adverse event associated with endoscopy. Current American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines recommend endoscopic closure as the first-line treatment strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buttar, J, Enns, R, Lam, E, Shahidi, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991129/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.120
_version_ 1784902078641995776
author Buttar, J
Enns, R
Lam, E
Shahidi, N
author_facet Buttar, J
Enns, R
Lam, E
Shahidi, N
author_sort Buttar, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforation is arguably the most feared adverse event associated with endoscopy. Current American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines recommend endoscopic closure as the first-line treatment strategy. Historically, this has been achieved using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). Given the emergence of alternative endoscopic closure techniques including over-the-scope clips (OTSC) and endoscopic suturing, we sought to provide an updated review of the literature. PURPOSE: To review endoscopic closure techniques following iatrogenic perforation during screening or therapeutic endoscopy. METHOD: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, an electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from June 1(st), 1946 – Oct 10(th), 2022 was performed. Inclusion criteria was limited to English full-text original citations, with case reports, and cohorts with < 3 patients excluded. Our primary objective was to assess complete defect closure after attempted endoscopic treatment. Outcomes were stratified by modality (TTSC, OTSC, endoscopic suturing) and chronologically based on a previous well received systematic review. RESULT(S): A total of 2549 citations were identified in our electronic search, of which 34 were included representing 830 perforations. Overall, successful endoscopic closure was achieved in 763 cases (91.9%). When stratified by endoscopic closure techniques, range estimates for successful endoscopic closure was 71% – 100%, 57% - 100%, and 100% for TTSC, OTSC and endoscopic suturing respectively. When stratifying chronologically, an improvement in TTSC closure was identified. CONCLUSION(S): Endoscopic defect closure, including TTSC, OTSC and endoscopic suturing, are effective in the management of iatrogenic perforations with increasing TTSC performance over time. It remains the primary treatment strategy for iatrogenic perforation. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE ALL FUNDING AGENCIES BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE BOXES BELOW: None DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99911292023-03-08 A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Buttar, J Enns, R Lam, E Shahidi, N J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Poster Presentations BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic perforation is arguably the most feared adverse event associated with endoscopy. Current American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines recommend endoscopic closure as the first-line treatment strategy. Historically, this has been achieved using through-the-scope clips (TTSC). Given the emergence of alternative endoscopic closure techniques including over-the-scope clips (OTSC) and endoscopic suturing, we sought to provide an updated review of the literature. PURPOSE: To review endoscopic closure techniques following iatrogenic perforation during screening or therapeutic endoscopy. METHOD: Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, an electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from June 1(st), 1946 – Oct 10(th), 2022 was performed. Inclusion criteria was limited to English full-text original citations, with case reports, and cohorts with < 3 patients excluded. Our primary objective was to assess complete defect closure after attempted endoscopic treatment. Outcomes were stratified by modality (TTSC, OTSC, endoscopic suturing) and chronologically based on a previous well received systematic review. RESULT(S): A total of 2549 citations were identified in our electronic search, of which 34 were included representing 830 perforations. Overall, successful endoscopic closure was achieved in 763 cases (91.9%). When stratified by endoscopic closure techniques, range estimates for successful endoscopic closure was 71% – 100%, 57% - 100%, and 100% for TTSC, OTSC and endoscopic suturing respectively. When stratifying chronologically, an improvement in TTSC closure was identified. CONCLUSION(S): Endoscopic defect closure, including TTSC, OTSC and endoscopic suturing, are effective in the management of iatrogenic perforations with increasing TTSC performance over time. It remains the primary treatment strategy for iatrogenic perforation. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE ALL FUNDING AGENCIES BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE BOXES BELOW: None DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Oxford University Press 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9991129/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.120 Text en ڣ The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Presentations
Buttar, J
Enns, R
Lam, E
Shahidi, N
A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_fullStr A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_short A120 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE TECHNIQUES FOLLOWING ACUTE IATROGENIC PERFORATION -- AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
title_sort a120 endoscopic closure techniques following acute iatrogenic perforation -- an updated systematic review
topic Poster Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991129/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.120
work_keys_str_mv AT buttarj a120endoscopicclosuretechniquesfollowingacuteiatrogenicperforationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT ennsr a120endoscopicclosuretechniquesfollowingacuteiatrogenicperforationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT lame a120endoscopicclosuretechniquesfollowingacuteiatrogenicperforationanupdatedsystematicreview
AT shahidin a120endoscopicclosuretechniquesfollowingacuteiatrogenicperforationanupdatedsystematicreview