Cargando…

A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION

BACKGROUND: Optical evaluation has become the cornerstone of early gastrointestinal neoplasia management as it informs therapeutic decisions between minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques and surgery. PURPOSE: We report an unusual case of a subepithelial gastric inlet patch (GIP) with op...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aboalfaraj, N T, Shahidi, N, Tomaszewski, M, Jiang, S, Xiong, W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991254/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.139
_version_ 1784902111414190080
author Aboalfaraj, N T
Shahidi, N
Tomaszewski, M
Jiang, S
Xiong, W
author_facet Aboalfaraj, N T
Shahidi, N
Tomaszewski, M
Jiang, S
Xiong, W
author_sort Aboalfaraj, N T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optical evaluation has become the cornerstone of early gastrointestinal neoplasia management as it informs therapeutic decisions between minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques and surgery. PURPOSE: We report an unusual case of a subepithelial gastric inlet patch (GIP) with optical evaluation mimicking early squamous neoplasia METHOD: Case Presentation: A 74-year-old male was referred for epigastric discomfort. On esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a 10-mm GIP was identified at 23cm from the incisors. Furthermore, a 15-mm polypoid lesion was identified at 25cm from the incisors on the contralateral wall. On optical evaluation, it was believed to be atypical but suspicious for squamous neoplasia (Figure 1). Histopathology of the lesion revealed a stratified squamous epithelium with an underlying focus on glandular mucosa. After a multidisciplinary team review, endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed, given the atypical optical characteristics of the lesion. RESULT(S): Histopathology of the lesion identified subepithelial gastric cardia-type mucosa with focal extension into the muscularis mucosae, most consistent with a subepithelial GIP. No neoplasia was identified. IMAGE: [Image: see text] CONCLUSION(S): We describe an unusual case of subepithelial GIP. With the widespread availability of high-definition endoscopes equipped with image-enhanced endoscopy, this case highlights the optical characteristics of this likely underappreciated endoscopic finding. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE ALL FUNDING AGENCIES BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE BOXES BELOW: None DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99912542023-03-08 A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION Aboalfaraj, N T Shahidi, N Tomaszewski, M Jiang, S Xiong, W J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Poster Presentations BACKGROUND: Optical evaluation has become the cornerstone of early gastrointestinal neoplasia management as it informs therapeutic decisions between minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques and surgery. PURPOSE: We report an unusual case of a subepithelial gastric inlet patch (GIP) with optical evaluation mimicking early squamous neoplasia METHOD: Case Presentation: A 74-year-old male was referred for epigastric discomfort. On esophagogastroduodenoscopy, a 10-mm GIP was identified at 23cm from the incisors. Furthermore, a 15-mm polypoid lesion was identified at 25cm from the incisors on the contralateral wall. On optical evaluation, it was believed to be atypical but suspicious for squamous neoplasia (Figure 1). Histopathology of the lesion revealed a stratified squamous epithelium with an underlying focus on glandular mucosa. After a multidisciplinary team review, endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed, given the atypical optical characteristics of the lesion. RESULT(S): Histopathology of the lesion identified subepithelial gastric cardia-type mucosa with focal extension into the muscularis mucosae, most consistent with a subepithelial GIP. No neoplasia was identified. IMAGE: [Image: see text] CONCLUSION(S): We describe an unusual case of subepithelial GIP. With the widespread availability of high-definition endoscopes equipped with image-enhanced endoscopy, this case highlights the optical characteristics of this likely underappreciated endoscopic finding. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE ALL FUNDING AGENCIES BY CHECKING THE APPLICABLE BOXES BELOW: None DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Oxford University Press 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9991254/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.139 Text en ڣ The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Presentations
Aboalfaraj, N T
Shahidi, N
Tomaszewski, M
Jiang, S
Xiong, W
A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title_full A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title_fullStr A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title_full_unstemmed A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title_short A139 ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER: A CURIOUS CASE OF DISCORDANT ENDOSCOPIC OPTICAL EVALUATION
title_sort a139 one of these things is not like the other: a curious case of discordant endoscopic optical evaluation
topic Poster Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991254/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.139
work_keys_str_mv AT aboalfarajnt a139oneofthesethingsisnotliketheotheracuriouscaseofdiscordantendoscopicopticalevaluation
AT shahidin a139oneofthesethingsisnotliketheotheracuriouscaseofdiscordantendoscopicopticalevaluation
AT tomaszewskim a139oneofthesethingsisnotliketheotheracuriouscaseofdiscordantendoscopicopticalevaluation
AT jiangs a139oneofthesethingsisnotliketheotheracuriouscaseofdiscordantendoscopicopticalevaluation
AT xiongw a139oneofthesethingsisnotliketheotheracuriouscaseofdiscordantendoscopicopticalevaluation