Cargando…
Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques
PURPOSE: Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160 |
_version_ | 1784902172491644928 |
---|---|
author | Grzywacz, Vincent P. Arden, Jessica D. Mankuzhy, Nikhil P. Gustafson, Gary S. Sebastian, Evelyn A. Abbott, Veronica L. Walters, Kailee J. Puzzonia, Julie A. Limbacher, Amy S. Hafron, Jason M. Krauss, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Grzywacz, Vincent P. Arden, Jessica D. Mankuzhy, Nikhil P. Gustafson, Gary S. Sebastian, Evelyn A. Abbott, Veronica L. Walters, Kailee J. Puzzonia, Julie A. Limbacher, Amy S. Hafron, Jason M. Krauss, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Grzywacz, Vincent P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A “normal tissue” structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. RESULTS: Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9991537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99915372023-03-08 Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques Grzywacz, Vincent P. Arden, Jessica D. Mankuzhy, Nikhil P. Gustafson, Gary S. Sebastian, Evelyn A. Abbott, Veronica L. Walters, Kailee J. Puzzonia, Julie A. Limbacher, Amy S. Hafron, Jason M. Krauss, Daniel J. Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A “normal tissue” structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. RESULTS: Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy. Elsevier 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9991537/ /pubmed/36896212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Grzywacz, Vincent P. Arden, Jessica D. Mankuzhy, Nikhil P. Gustafson, Gary S. Sebastian, Evelyn A. Abbott, Veronica L. Walters, Kailee J. Puzzonia, Julie A. Limbacher, Amy S. Hafron, Jason M. Krauss, Daniel J. Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title | Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title_full | Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title_fullStr | Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title_short | Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques |
title_sort | normal tissue integral dose as a result of prostate radiation therapy: a quantitative comparison between high-dose-rate brachytherapy and modern external beam radiation therapy techniques |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grzywaczvincentp normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT ardenjessicad normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT mankuzhynikhilp normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT gustafsongarys normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT sebastianevelyna normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT abbottveronical normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT walterskaileej normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT puzzoniajuliea normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT limbacheramys normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT hafronjasonm normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques AT kraussdanielj normaltissueintegraldoseasaresultofprostateradiationtherapyaquantitativecomparisonbetweenhighdoseratebrachytherapyandmodernexternalbeamradiationtherapytechniques |